806
S. J. Ahmadi et al.
resultant beads were allowed to stand in the solution for 3 h
at room temperature on a magnetic stirrer, and then they
were washed three times with pure water and eventually
dried at 400 °C for 10 h. The dried granules were trans-
ferred into a muffle furnace and calcined at 600 °C (MS1),
700 °C (MS2), and 800 °C (MS3) for 6 h to decompose and
burn all of the organic materials.
All products were known and characterized by com-
parison of their physical and spectra data with those
already reported [13, 21–24].
Acknowledgments The authors are thankful to the Nuclear Science
and Technology Research Institute for the partial financial support.
References
Characterization
1. Nandurkar NS, Bhanushali MJ, Bhor MD, Bhanage BM (2007)
Tetrahedron Lett 48:6573
The crystal structures of the prepared CuO nanoparticles
and final granules were analyzed by using Cu Ka radiation
(Philips PW 1800). The particle size and morphology of the
nanocrystalline particles were examined using a transmis-
sion electron microscope (TEM, LEO 912AB). In the case
of granules, a scanning electron microscope (SEM,
LEO1455VP) was used for the same purpose. The surface
areas of the CuO nanoparticles and the nano-structured
CuO granules were determined by the nitrogen adsorption
BET method (Quantachrome Instruments, Nova 2000e).
2. Sperotto E, Vries JG, van Klink GP, van Koten G (2007) Tet-
rahedron Lett 48:7366
3. Punniyamurthy T, Rout L (2008) Coord Chem Rev 252:134
4. Ley SV, Thomas AW (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:5400
5. Beletskaya LP, Cheprakov AV (2004) Coord Chem Rev
248:2337
6. Frisch AC, Beller M (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:674
7. Deng W, Wang Y-F, Zou Y, Liu L, Guo Q-X (2004) Tetrahedron
Lett 45:2311
8. Moriwaki K, Satoh K, Takada M, Ishino Y, Ohno T (2005)
Tetrahedron Lett 46:7559
9. Mao J, Guo J, Song H, Ji S-J (2008) Tetrahedron 64:1383
10. Verma AK, Singh J, Sankar VK, Chaudhary R, Chandra R (2007)
Tetrahedron Lett 48:4207
11. Zhang J, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zheng X, Wang Z (2008) Eur J Org
Chem 2008(30):5112
Catalytic reactions
12. Jammi S, Sakthivel S, Rout L, Mukherjee T, Mandal S, Mitra R,
Saha P, Punniyamurthy T (2009) J Org Chem 74:1971
13. Rout H, Jammi S, Punniyamurthy T (2007) Org Lett 9:3397
14. Jia Y, Kanno Y, Xie Z (2002) J Eur Ceram Soc 22:1911
15. Xie Z, Wang X, Jia Y, Huang Y (2003) Mater Lett 57:1635
16. Janney MA, Omatete OO, Walls CA, Nunn SD, Ogle RJ,
Westmoreland G (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:581
17. Xie Z-P, Huang Y, Chen Y-L, Jia Y (2001) J Mater Sci Lett
20:1255
18. Jia Y, Kanno Y, Xie Z (2003) Mater Lett 57:2530
19. Ma J, Xie Z, Miao H, Zhang B, Lin X, Cheng Y (2005) Mater
Des 26:291
20. Yu Z, Huang Y, Wang C, Ouyang S (2004) Ceram Int 30:503
21. Rao H, Fu H, Jiang Y, Zhao Y (2005) J Org Chem 70:8107
22. Zhang H, Cai Q, Ma D (2005) J Org Chem 70:5164
23. Taillefer M, Xia N, Ouali A (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:934
24. Anderson KW, Mendez-Perez M, Priego J, Buchwald SL (2003) J
Org Chem 68:9563
CuO granules (MS1, 1.26 mol%) were added to a stirred
solution of amine (1.2 mmol), iodobenzene (1 mmol), and
KOH (1 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 110 °C
for the appropriate time (Table 5) and then allowed to cool to
room temperature. Diethyl ether (2 cm3) and 2 cm3 water
were then added to the reaction mixture and the catalyst was
removed by high speed centrifugation (for CuO nano-cata-
lyst) or simple filtration (for CuO granules). The reaction
mixture was further extracted with diethyl ether
(3 9 5 cm3). The combined organic phases were washed
with brine and dried over sodium sulfate. The solvent was
removed by rotary evaporation to give a residue which was
purified on silica gel column chromatography using ethyl
acetate and hexane as eluent.
123