C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
On the basis of studies of plasma-enhanced CVD of SiO2 from
TEOS and O2 performed by Aydil et al.,13 where silanol groups
were identified after exposure of TEOS to an oxygen plasma, we
expect silanols to form similarly during PA-ALD. However, due
to the monolayer (or submonolayer) tSi-OH coverage, we cannot
quantify the extent of surface hydrolysis. Additionally, we expect
that the plasma could serve a catalytic role by generating nucleo-
philic oxo radicals, tSi-O•, that promote siloxane bond formation.
Apparently, at room temperature, the extent of these plasma-assisted
hydrolysis and condensation reactions is less than that for ammonia-
catalyzed hydrolysis and condensation reactions during conventional
room temperature ALD,11 explaining the low deposition rates.
Consistent with a low rate of siloxane bond formation is the highly
conformal and dense PA-ALD layer indicative of a reaction-limited
monomer-cluster growth processsin our case confined exclusively
to the plasma-activated surface.12
Here we emphasize PA-ALD as a means of sealing pores.
However, with the very high degree of thickness control that we
demonstrate (0.03 nm/cycle), which remains linear for at least 150
cycles, we envision that, prior to complete pore sealing, we will
progressively reduce the pore size of the mesoporous silica in a
sub-Å/cycle fashion. This combined with the thin PA-ALD layer
thickness could have very important implications for membrane
formation, where extremely thin inorganic films with precisely
controlled pore size could enable the synthesis of robust mimics
of natural ion or water channels of interest for sensors and water
purification.
Figure 2. TEM images demonstrating the pore-sealing effectiveness by
PA-ALD: (a) regular cross-sectional TEM image showing the mesoporous
sample treated by PA-ALD pore-sealing process and then exposed to TiO2
ALD conditions; (b) Ti-mapping image in the same area acquired with
electron-energy-loss image filtering mode.
(or submonolayer) of adsorbed precursor. RF power was then
delivered to the coil, creating an O2 and Ar plasma. The associated
radicals convert surface-adsorbed TEOS into reactive silanols and
may promote further conversion to siloxane. Following this, the
deposition chamber was purged again to remove the residual
gaseous products, completing one cycle; 150 cycles were performed,
each cycle requiring 5 s.
Figure 1a,b shows cross-sectional TEM images of the sample.
A 5 nm thick SiO2 coating is observed as the smooth dark rim
bordering the patterned mesoporous silica feature. Clearly, the
coating is conformal to the patterned morphology and uniform in
thickness. No penetration of the SiO2 into the porous matrix can
be observed. The measured k of the corresponding planar sample
equaled 2.49 (Supporting Information), consistent with minimal
penetration of the PA-ALD layer.
To verify the pore-sealing effectiveness, the PA-ALD-coated
sample was introduced into a conventional ALD reactor, where
we performed thermal TiO2 ALD, shown previously to infiltrate
surfactant-templated mesoporous silica. At 180 °C, the PA-ALD-
coated sample was treated with 100 thermal ALD cycles using TiCl4
and H2O as the precursors. Figure 2a is a regular cross-sectional
TEM image, where we observe two ALD layers. The inner, lighter
layer is the PA-ALD SiO2 coating, and the outer, darker layer is
the TiO2 thermal ALD coating. The mesoporous low k silica appears
completely unaffected, suggesting that TiCl4 and H2O cannot
penetrate through the PA-ALD SiO2 coating to form TiO2 in the
underlying porous silica matrix. This is further supported by the
Ti-mapping image in Figure 2b. The bright border in this image
represents the location of Ti and corresponds to the TiO2 overlayer
shown in Figure 2a. Comparing the Ti-mapping image (Figure 2b)
to the original regular TEM image (Figure 2a), no detectable TiO2
can be found beyond the PA-ALD SiO2 coating. Therefore, the
PA-ALD SiO2 coating, although only 5 nm thick, is sufficiently
dense and defect-free to seal the pores and protect the porous low
k silica from exposure to gaseous chemicals.
Concerning the mechanism of room temperature PA-ALD of
SiO2, we first note that the deposition rate is quite low, 0.03 nm/
cycle, compared to 0.07-0.08 nm/cycle measured by George et
al. for conventional NH3-catalyzed SiO2 ALD.11 Conventional ALD
uses multiple water/TEOS cycles, where water exposures hydrolyze
ethoxysilane bonds to form silanols and alkoxide exposure results
in condensation reactions to form siloxane bonds. As for the related
solution-based “sol-gel” reactions, hydrolysis and condensation
are bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions catalyzed by acid
or base.12 In PA-ALD, plasma exposure takes the place of
hydrolysis, activating the alkoxide surface toward TEOS adsorption.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Army
Research Office Grant DAAD19-03-1-0227, DOE Basic Energy
Sciences, Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant FA9550-
04-1-0087, the NIH Nanomedicine Center program, and the SNL
LDRD program. Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by
Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United
States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Admin-
istration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. We would also like
to thank Prof. S. Brueck at UNM-Center for HTM for access to
interferometric lithography.
Supporting Information Available: Additional supporting figures
and table. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) 2004 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Interconnect,
SIA.
(2) Peters, L. Semiconductor International, October 2005, 49-53.
(3) de Rouffignac, P.; Li, Z. W.; Gordon, R. G. Electrochem. Solid State
Lett. 2004, 7, G306-G308.
(4) Cameron, M. A.; Gartland, I. P.; Smith, J. A.; Diaz, S. F.; George S. M.
Langmuir 2000, 16, 7435-7444.
(5) Ek, S.; Iiskola, E. I.; Niinisto¨, L. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3461-3471.
(6) Travaly, Y.; Schuhmacher, J.; Baklanov, M. R.; Giangrandi, S.; Richard,
O.; Brijs, B.; Van Hove, M.; Maex, K.; Abell, T.; Somers, K. R. F. J.
Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 083515.
(7) Elers, K. E.; Winkler, J.; Weeks, K.; Marcus, S. J. Electrochem. Soc.
2005, 152, G589-G593.
(8) Kim, D. H.; Kim, Y. J.; Song, Y. S.; Lee, B. T.; Kim, J. H.; Suh, S.;
Gordon, R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, C740-C744.
(9) Kim, H.; Detavenier, C.; van der Straten, O.; Rossnagel, S. M.; Kellock,
A. J.; Park, D. G. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 014308.
(10) Brinker, C. J.; Lu, Y. F.; Sellinger, A.; Fan, H. Y. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11,
579-585.
(11) Ferguson, J. D.; Smith, E. R.; Weimer, A. W.; George, S. M. J.
Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, G528-G535.
(12) Brinker, C. J.; Scherer, G. W. Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and
Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing; Academic Press: San Diago, 1990.
(13) Deshmukh, S.; Aydil, E. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1995, 13, 2355-2367.
JA061097D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 34, 2006 11019