excluded in an enzyme catalyzed reaction, it would be hard
to envision its involvement in a practice of synthesis.
Instead, we hypothesized that incarviditone (2) might be
generated from the homodimerization of (()-3 via TS-4
instead of TS-3. If this hypothesis is correct, the structure
of incarviditone (2) may be incorrectly assigned in the
original isolation paper4 and require revision.
Table 1. Condition Screening of the Dimerization of
(()-Rengyolone (3)
Keeping this hypothesis in mind, we pursue the biomi-
metic total synthesis of 1 and 2. The monomer (()-3 was
initially prepared from commercially available 11 by em-
ploying the known method through a sequence of oxidative
dearomatization, reduction of the peroxy functionality,
and intramolecular oxa-Michael addition (Scheme 2).7
However, scale-up of this sequence proved to be problem-
atic, and the overall yield of (()-3 was only 20ꢀ25%.
Therefore, a more practical and scalable procedure was
developed, which involved three synthetic operations: (1)
selective TBS-protection of the primary alcohol of 11 to
afford 12, (2) dearomatization of 12 utilizing PhI(OAc)2 to
provide 13,8 and (3) deprotection of 13 with TBAF fol-
lowed by intramolecular conjugate addition to yield (()-3.
This procedure enabled the multigram-scale synthesis of
(()-3 in 50% overall yield for three steps.
yield of yield of
entry
base
solvent
1 (%)
2 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DABCO (excess)
DBU (excess)
dioxane/H2O
DCM
NR
NR
15a
0a
NR
NR
17a
7a
t-BuOK (2.0 equiv)
THF
NaHMDS (2.0 equiv) THF
NaH (2.0 equiv)
NaH (2.0 equiv)
NaH (1.0 equiv)
NaH (0.5 equiv)
THF
DCM
DCM
DCM
0a
0a
25b
38b
30b
30b
40b
35b
a Refers to 1H NMR yield with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal
standard. b Refers to isolated yield. DABCO = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]-
octane. DBU =1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene. NaHMDS = sodium
bis(trimethylsilyl)amide.
the workofCarreno,11 inwhich the homodimerization and
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Monomer (()-Rengyolone (3)
ꢀ
trimerization of a p-quinol type of substrates via successive
conjugate additions were well investigated, we tried the
NaH/DCM combination in this reaction. To our delight,
treatment of (()-3 with NaH (2.0 equiv) in DCM for
12 h afforded two major products in yields of 25% and
30%, respectively (entry 6). One of them was shown to
be carvilleatone (1) based on the good agreement of its
spectroscopic data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS)
with those of the natural product3 as well as the X-ray
crystallographic study.12 The other, as will be discussed in
more detail below, was incarviditone.
Although only modest yields were obtained, the results
demonstrated the feasibility of the biomimetic strategy.
Encouraged by these results, we examined the effect of
other reaction parameters on the transformation. Although
substantial amounts of starting material were recovered in
the reaction listed in entry 6, efforts to improve the conver-
sion by extending the reaction time, elevating the reaction
temperature, or using a large excess of NaH only led to the
formation of some unidentified products. In sharp con-
trast, when the dimerization reaction was performed with a
reduced amount of NaH (1.0 equiv), 1 and 2 were obtained
in a satisfactory yield of 38% and 40%, respectively,
accompanied with the recovery of 10% of the starting
material (entry 7). Furthermore, we found that even sub-
stoichiometric amounts (0.5 equiv) of NaH could effectively
promote the transformation, with only a lightly decreased
yield of 1 and 2 obtained (entry 8).13 No stereoisomers of 1
With (()-rengyolone (3) in hand, we started to explore
conditions that could promote the proposed dimerization
reaction. Commonly used base/solvent combinations9 which
have been applied to promote the intermolecular oxa-
Michael addition,10 such as DABCO/dioxane/H2O, DBU/
DCM, t-BuOK/THF, NaHMDS/THF, and NaH/THF,
were examined, but none of them provided satisfying re-
sults (Table 1, entries 1ꢀ5) (for more details of condition
screening, see Supporting Information (SI)). Inspired by
(8) You, Z.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper, M. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 547–550.
(9) For selected examples of base-promoted intermolecular oxa-
ꢁ
Michael addition, see: (a) Dumez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Dulcere, J.-P.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 1831–1832. (b) Enders, D.; Haertwig, A.; Raabe,
€
G.; Runsink, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1771–1792. (c) Lesch, B.; Brase,
S. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 115–118. (d) Nising, C. F.;
€
€
Ohnemuller, U. K.; Brase, S. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 307–
309. (e) Xiong, X.; Ovens, C.; Pilling, A. W.; Ward, J. W.; Dixon, D. J.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 565–567.
~
(11) Carreno, M. C.; Ribagorda, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2425–2428.
(12) For X-ray crystallagraphic data of 1, see SI.
(13) For a detailed discussion on the dimerization of (()-(3) with
substoichiometric amounts of NaH, see SI.
(10) For reviews on the topic of oxa-Michael addition, see: (a)
€
Nising, C. F.; Brase, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1218–1228. (b) Nising,
€
C. F.; Brase, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 988–999.
4880
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 18, 2012