ChemSusChem
10.1002/cssc.202002305
COMMUNICATION
due to the incomplete MTA reaction. On the other hand,
increasing oxide/zeolite mass ratio can reduce the contact area of
PX and external surface of ZSM-5 zeolite during PX diffusion. In
addition, it can still cover more external surface of ZSM-5 zeolite
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Japan Science and Technology
Agency (MIRAI-JPMJMI17E2).
(
Figure S10, SI), which effectively suppresses the isomerization
of PX. The results revealed that the appropriate oxide/zeolite
mass ratio was efficient to increase PX selectivity and PX/X ratio.
As discussed above, large-size ZSM-5 controlled by low rotation
speed is more suitable for improving PX selectivity. In reality, on
Keywords: CO
2
conversion • ZSM-5 zeolite • Aromatics • Oxide-
Zeolite catalyst • Green chemistry
the small-size ZSM-5, the amount of Lewis acid sites is increased
from 42.1 to 63.5 μmol g-1 while the amount of Brønsted acid sites
[1]
a) Z. Li, Y. Qu, J. Wang, H. Liu, M. Li, S. Miao, C. Li, Joule, 2019, 3, 570-
83; b) M. Ghasemi, M. Mohammadi, M. Sedighi, Microporous
5
is unchanged basically (Table S17, SI). It suggests that more
Lewis acid sites on ZSM-5 zeolite are not favorable to increasing
the PX selectivity. When the oxide/zeolite mass ratio is increased,
more methanol intermediate forms while the acidic properties of
the ZSM-5 do not change. For a low oxide/zeolite ratio (1:1 or 1:2),
methanol can be completely converted. As for a high oxide/zeolite
mass ratio catalyst (48:1), more methanol is formed and not
completely converted, then presenting a high methanol and light
olefins selectivity. Based on the discussion above, there is an
optimal equilibrium between the methanol formation rate and the
amount of acid when there is an appropriate B/L ratio (Tables S18
and S19, SI).
Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 297, 110029; c) Y. Ni, Z. Chen, Y. Fu, Y. Liu,
W. Zhu, Z. Liu, Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3457; d) P. Gao, S. Dang, S. Li,
X. Bu, Z. Liu, M. Qiu, C. Yang, H. Wang, L. Zhong, Y. Han, Q. Liu, W.
Wei, Y. Sun, ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 571-578.
[2]
J. Wei, Q. Ge, R. Yao, Z. Wen, C. Fang, L. Guo, H. Xu, J. Sun, Nat.
Commun. 2017, 8, 15174.
[
3]
a) S. Kattel, P. Liu, J. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9739-9754;
b) A. Ramirez, A. Dutta Chowdhury, A. Dokania, P. Cnudde, M. Caglayan,
I. Yarulina, E. Abou-Hamad, L. Gevers, S. Ould-Chikh, K. De Wispelaere,
V. Van Speybroeck, J. Gascon, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6320-6334.
X. Cui, P. Gao, S. Li, C. Yang, Z. Liu, H. Wang, L. Zhong, Y. Sun, ACS
Catal. 2019, 9, 3866-3876.
[
[
[
4]
5]
6]
H. Yang, C. Zhang, P. Gao, H. Wang, X. Li, L. Zhong, W. Wei, Y. Sun,
Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 4580-4598.
a) X. Liu, M. Wang, C. Zhou, W. Zhou, K. Cheng, J. Kang, Q. Zhang, W.
Deng, Y. Wang, Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 140-143; b) J. Zhang, M.
Zhang, S. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Zhou, Y. Wu, T. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Han,
Y. Tan, Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 973-976.
[
[
7]
8]
Y. Wang, L. Tan, M. Tan, P. Zhang, Y. Fang, Y. Yoneyama, G. Yang, N.
Tsubaki, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 895-901.
a) K. Cheng, W. Zhou, J. Kang, S. He, S. Shi, Q. Zhang, Y. Pan, W. Wen,
Y. Wang, Chem, 2017, 3, 334-347; b) J. Yang, X. Pan, F. Jiao, J. Li, X.
Bao, Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11146-11149.
[
[
[
9]
J. Zhang, L. Wang, Z. Wu, H. Wang, C. Wang, S. Han, F. Xiao, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 15453-15458.
10] Y. Wang, W. Gao, S. Kazumi, H. Li, G. Yang, N. Tsubaki, Chem. – Eur.
J. 2019, 25, 5149-5153.
11] J. Zhang, W. Qian, C. Kong, F. Wei, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2982-2988.
-ZSM-5. Reaction conditions: 350 oC, 4.0 MPa,
2 4
O
-1
[12]
K. Miyake, Y. Hirota, K. Ono, Y. Uchida, S. Tanaka, N. Nishiyama, J.
Catal. 2016, 342, 63-66.
Figure 4. Stability of ZnCr
23.8vol% CO , 3.94vol% CO, 4.14vol% Ar and H
Catalyst weight, 0.5 g, oxide/zeolite mass ratio = 12:1.
(
2
2
balance), 10 mL min .
[13] C. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Huang, Y. Zhu, G. Li, Q. Gu, J. Chen, L. Ma, X. Li,
Q. He, J. Xu, Q. Sun, C. Song, M. Peng, J. Sun, D. Ma, Nat. Commun.
2019, 10, 4348.
The stability experiment of ZnCr
ratio at 12:1) was also evaluated at 350 C, 4.0 MPa. As depicted
2
O
4
-ZSM-5 (oxide/zeolite mass
o
[14] F. Jiao, J. Li, X. Pan, J. Xiao, H. Li, H. Ma, M. Wei, Y. Pan, Z. Zhou, M.
Li, S. Miao, J. Li, Y. Zhu, D. Xiao, T. He, J. Yang, F. Qi, Q. Fu, X. Bao,
Science 2016, 351, 1065-1068.
2
in Figure 4, CO conversion and CO selectivity maintained at
around 22% and 28% during 100 h. The aromatics selectivity
decreased from 66.1% to 53.9% at 60 h and then kept stable.
Moreover, the selectivity of C2-4 slightly increased by lowering
aromatics selectivity to little extent in time-on-stream. The PX
selectivity leveled off around 23% after 30 h and PX/X ratio
remained stable at around 89%.
[
15]
L. Tan, F. Wang, P. Zhang, Y. Suzuki, Y. Wu, J. Chen, G. Yang, N.
Tsubaki, Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4097-4105.
[
16] S. Wang, P. Wang, Z. Qin, Y. Chen, M. Dong, J. Li, K. Zhang, P. Liu, J.
Wang, W. Fan, ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 5485-5505.
[17] C. Zhou, J. Shi, W. Zhou, K. Cheng, Q. Zhang, J. Kang, Y. Wang, ACS
Catal. 2019, 10, 302-310.
[
18] Z. Sousa, C. Veloso, C. Henriques, V. Teixeira da Silva, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2016, 422, 266-274.
In conclusion, we prepared an Oxide-Zeolite catalyst composed
of ZnCr
converted CO
zeolite with few external Brønsted acid sites presented excellent
2
O
4
and tailor-made ZSM-5 zeolite, which directly
2
to aromatics with high PX selectivity. The ZSM-5
PX selectivity of 28.6% based on 23.4% CO
2
conversion at 350
o
C and 4.0 MPa (Table S1 and Figure S9, Supporting Information).
Furthermore, PX/X ratio could be promoted to 97.3% by
increasing the oxide/zeolite mass ratio to 48:1. This report
provides a promising strategy to design an efficient Oxide-Zeolite
catalyst for converting CO
2
to highly valuable chemicals,
especially to PX, with high selectivity.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.