Thermal Chemistry of Neopentyl Iodide
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 50, 1996 12745
Scheme 1
carbene), as in metathesis processes.46,47 Both the formation
of a 3,3-dimethyl nickelacyclobutane from the corresponding
dineopentyl-metal complex and its subsequent decomposition
to isobutene have in fact been reported recently.4 There are
nevertheless several reasons why this mechanism is not con-
sistent with our observations for the neopentyl/Ni(100) sys-
tem: (1) no γ-hydrogens are activated below 400 K, which
means that if a metallacycle were to form on the nickel surface,
it would have to be produced at that high temperature, and would
have to decompose immediately afterwards; (2) because an early
R-H elimination is seen in the hydrogen TPD of deuterium-
labeled compounds, an alkylidene, not alkyl, species is believed
to be the starting moiety in the high-temperature conversion of
neopentyl to isobutene; (3) if isobutene were to be produced
via the ring opening of a 3,3-dimethyl nickelacyclobutane
intermediate, the probabilities for R-â and â-γ C-C bond
scissions would be approximately equal, an expectation incon-
sistent with the high selectivity seen here toward the activation
of the CR-Câ bond; and (4) a γ-hydride elimination rate-limiting
step can not account for the large kinetic isotope effect upon
deuterium substitution at the R position of the neopentyl moiety
reported above.
nation to µ-vinylidene has been observed instead,57 but such a
reaction does not lead to the R-â C-C bond scission reported
here, and is not even available on neopentyl groups (which do
not have â hydrogens). Two more reactions are available to
8
5
8
coordinated carbenes, namely, direct dimerization and 1,2-
5
9
shift to the corresponding alkenes, but both those steps are
more common with Fischer-type carbenes, and do not explain
the isobutene formation seen here either.
Given the importance of alkyls as intermediates in the
catalytic conversion of alkanes (in reactions such as hydrogena-
tion-dehydrogenation, re-forming, and partial and total oxida-
tion), extensive work has been done on those systems as
6
0-62
well.
The catalytic H-D exchange of neopentane on nickel
films has been shown to be limited mostly to one methyl group,
and to yield neopentane-d and -d as the major products.
63
1
3
A
mechanism was proposed for this reaction where the initial
surface neopentyl intermediate that forms after neopentane
activation follows one of two competing pathways, a reductive
elimination with surface deuterium to neopentane-d , or a fast
1
interconversion with an R,R-diadsorbed species (neopentylidene)
followed by a slower hydrogenation to neopentane-d . These
3
ideas are entirely consistent with the results of our work.
A related mechanism to the one discussed in the previous
The catalytic H-D exchange on neopentane is usually
accompanied by slower hydrogenolysis and isomerization
processes. Three basic mechanisms have been proposed to
explain these reactions: (1) a direct isomerization via an R,R,γ-
paragraph involves an initial direct carbene extrusion from the
original neopentyl moiety4
3,49
and a subsequent â-hydride
elimination from the resulting tert-butyl surface species to
isobutene. The preferential C-C bond cleavage at the R
position via this type of mechanism was proven for the case of
6
4
tricoordinated bridged species; (2) the intermediate isomer-
ization of that tricoordinated metallacycle to a monocoordinated
5
0
65
a nickelacyclohexane complex by using deuterium labeling.
This idea, however, can be discarded in our case as well, because
1) again, the starting reactant on the nickel surface is neo-
cyclopentyl species; and (3) a methyl transfer via a cyclo-
pentane-like intermediate, the same as in the bond-shift mech-
6
6,67
(
anism in carbonium ions.
It is important to point out,
pentylidene, not neopentyl; and (2) since the â-hydride elimina-
tion that must follow the extrusion is fast, this mechanism would
not induce any kinetic isotope effects upon substitution at the
γ position.
however, that these ideas have been put forward mainly to
explain isomerization reactions (from neopentane to 2-meth-
ylbutane in this case), and such processes are seen almost
exclusively on platinum-based catalysts. No isomerization is
observed in the case of nickel, only the production of isobutane
(as well as smaller amounts of methane, ethane and propane).63
The bottom line is that none of the mechanisms enumerated
above is supported by the evidence obtained from our experi-
ments. Finally, it is interesting to note that on Pt(111) surfaces
The alternative initial R-hydride elimination reported here has
indeed been seen in organometallic compounds, especially of
early transition metals.5
1-53
However, the resulting alkylidenes
most often dehydrogenate further to alkylidynes,5 and those
4
are quite stable, even though they occasionally dimerize to
5
5,56
produce alkynes.
In some clusters alkylidyne dehydroge-
(
56) Kim, H. P.; Angelici, R. J. AdV. Organometal. Chem. 1987, 27, 51.
(
46) Lee, J. B.; Ott, K. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
491.
47) Dragutan, V.; Balaban, A. T.; Dimonie, M. Olefin Metathesis and
Ring Opening Polymerization of Cycloolefins; Wiley: New York, 1986.
48) Miyashita, A.; Ohyoshi, M.; Shitara, H.; Nohira, H. J. Organometal.
Chem. 1988, 338, 103.
49) Stenstrøm, Y.; Klauck, G.; Koziol, A.; Palenik, G. J.; Jones, W. M.
Organometallics 1986, 5, 2155.
(57) Rashidi, M.; Puddephatt, R. J. Organometallics 1988, 7, 1636.
(58) Merrifield, J. H.; Lin, G.-Y.; Kiel, W. A.; Gladysz, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5811.
7
(
(59) Fischer, E. O.; Schubert, U.; Fischer, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1878,
50, 587.
(
(60) Bond, G. C. Catalysis by Metals; Academic Press: London, 1962.
(61) Kemball, C. AdV. Catal. Relat. Subj. 1959, 11, 223.
(62) Zaera, F.; Somorjai, G. A. In Hydrogen Effects in Catalysis:
Fundamentals and Practical Applications; Pa a´ l, Z.; Menon, P. G., Eds.;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 1988; pp 425-447.
(63) Kemball, C.; Kempling, J. C. Proc. R. Soc. London A 1972, 329,
391.
(64) Anderson, J. R.; Avery, N. R.; J. Catal. 1966, 5, 446.
(65) Garin, F.; Gault, F. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4466.
(66) McKervey, M. A.; Rooney, J. J.; Samman, N. G. J. Catal. 1973,
30, 330.
(
(
(
50) Grubbs, R. H.; Miyashita, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7418.
51) Cooper, N. J.; Green, M. L. H. J. Chem. Soc, Dalton Trans. 1979,
1
121.
(52) Schrock, R. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 98.
53) Cross, R. J. in The Chemistry of the Metal-Carbon Bond; Hartley,
(
F. R., Patai, S., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1985; Vol. 2; pp 559-624.
54) Churchill, M. R.; Wasserman, H. J.; Turner, H. W.; Schrock, R. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1710.
55) McDermott, G. A.; Mayr, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 580.
(
(
(67) Karpinski, Z.; Guczi, L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 563.