C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Experimental Reaction Rate Constants (10-10 cm3
molecule-1 s-1) and Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effects for RCl +
ClO- f Products
mol-1. These small deviations in the activation enthalpy can have
a large effect on the branching ratios. Determining activation
enthalpies with an accuracy of 0.5 kcal mol-1 or better is a difficult
computational task.39
RCl
k
KIE
CH3Cl
CD3Cl
2.01 ( 0.01
2.36 ( 0.01
2.25 ( 0.01a
2.27 ( 0.01a
1.74 ( 0.03
1.01 ( 0.02
2.33 ( 0.03
1.01 ( 0.05
0.85 ( 0.01
These results illuminate the need for additional studies to describe
nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions more accurately.
We hope that the discrepancy between experiment and theory will
spark interest for further exploration.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Professors Charles DePuy
and Barry Carpenter for valuable discussions and Professor Gustavo
Davico for the initiation of the first experiment. This research was
supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE-
0349937).
C2H5Cl
C2D5Cl
i-C3H7Cl
i-C3D7Cl
t-C4H9Cl
t-C4D9Cl
0.99 ( 0.01a
1.72 ( 0.05
2.31 ( 0.12
a Computational results predict k ) 6.7 × 10-10 and k ) 2.8 × 10-10
cm3 molecule-1 s-1 for ClO- with C2H5Cl and C2D5Cl, respectively, and
a KIE of 2.4.1
References
inverse KIEs for SN2 reactions of methyl halides.23,24 The reaction
of ClO- with tert-butyl chloride presumably proceeds primarily
by E2.16 A KIE of 2.31((0.12) was measured which is consistent
with previously measured normal KIEs for E2 reactions.5,25 As the
extent of substitution in the neutral reactants increases, the KIE
effects become increasingly more normal. These results indicate
that the E2 pathway becomes the dominant channel as the neutral
reagent becomes more sterically hindered.
The experimental reaction efficiencies (10% for ClO- with
C2H5Cl)26 and KIE reported here for the reaction of ClO- with
ethyl chloride differ from the theoretical values, suggesting that
the SN2 channel is more prominent than calculations predict. It is
difficult to account for the discrepancies between experiment and
theory; however nonstatistical dynamics27 or errors in the calculation
of the individual KIE or in the branching ratios of the two channels
could account for the discrepancy.
(1) Hu, W. P.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 860.
(2) Olmstead, W. N.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4219.
(3) Laerdahl, J. K.; Uggerud, E. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 214, 277.
(4) Hase, W. L. Encyc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 4, 504.
(5) de Koning, L. J.; Nibbering, N. M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
1715.
(6) Gronert, S.; Kass, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7991.
(7) Gronert, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 848.
(8) Lieder, C. A.; Brauman, J. I. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1975, 16,
307.
(9) Noest, A. J.; Nibbering, N. M. M. AdV. Mass Spectrom. 1980, 8, 227.
(10) Bartmess, J. E.; Hays, R. L.; Kahatri, H. N.; Misra, R. N.; Wilson, S. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4746.
(11) Lum, R. C.; Grabowski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8568.
(12) Jonas, M. E.; Ellison, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1645.
(13) Wladkowski, B. D.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10643.
(14) Gronert, S.; Pratt, L. M.; Mogali, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3081.
(15) Gronert, S.; Fagin, A. E.; Okamoto, K.; Mogali, S.; Pratt, L. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12977.
(16) DePuy, C. H.; Gronert, S.; Mullin, A.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 8650.
(17) Gronert, S.; DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 4009.
Hu and Truhlar’s treatment of the reaction between ClO- and
ethyl chloride assumes that the reaction is statistical. Statistical
theories are based on the assumption that energy is randomized
among different modes as the reaction proceeds from reactants to
the transition state. Nonstatistical effects have been observed for
SN2 reactions of monatomic nucleophiles with methyl halides, and
these effects have been extensively documented in the liter-
ature.23,24,28-32 However the use of statistical theories has been
successful for slightly larger systems.33-35 Furthermore, Hu and
Truhlar have previously calculated the KIE for the SN2 reaction of
solvated fluoride with methyl chloride using a statistical approach.36
Their results show excellent agreement with our published experi-
mental values.37 Thus the assumption that the ClO- + C2H5Cl
reaction behaves statistically is reasonable.
(18) Melander, L.; Saunders, J. H., Jr. Reaction Rates of Isotopic Molecules;
John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980.
(19) Poirier, R. A.; Youliang, W.; Westaway, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 2526.
(20) Van Doren, J. M.; Barlow, S. E.; DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum, V. M. Int. J.
Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1987, 81, 85.
(21) Bierbaum, V. M. Encyc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 1, 98.
(22) (CH3Cl 99.9%, CD3Cl 99.9%, C2H5Cl >99%, C2D5Cl 98%, i-C3H7Cl 99%,
i-C3D7Cl 99.4%, t-C4H9Cl 99%, t-C4D9Cl 99.1%). An HCl impurity would
complicate the rate measurements due to a rapid proton-transfer pathway,
which could not be distinguished from the SN2 and E2 channels. Therefore,
37Cl- was mass selected and allowed to react with the neutral reagents.
We have previously shown [Van Doren, J. M.; DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum,
V. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 1130] that the rates of these reactions are
below the detection limits of our instrument; however, the Cl- + HCl
exchange reaction proceeds at approximately half of the collision rate.
The absence of 35Cl- as a product ion indicates that HCl is not a significant
contaminant.
(23) Viggiano, A. A.; Morris, R. A.; Paschkewitz, J. S.; Paulsen, J. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10477.
The individual KIE values, which Hu and Truhlar evaluated,
appear quite reasonable. It can be argued that the errors in the
branching ratio calculations are the primary cause for the large
deviation from the experimental results.38 If the predicted branching
ratios were correct, the KIE for the E2 channel would need to be
1.0 or smaller or the KIE for the SN2 channel would need to be
0.13 or smaller to be consistent with the measured overall KIE.
These values are not reasonable based on previous results. On the
other hand assuming that the individual KIE are correct and that
the discrepancy lies in the calculation of the branching ratios, we
can use the calculated individual KIE along with the experimental
overall rate constant and KIE to predict the rate constants for the
SN2 and E2 channels to be 1.10 × 10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1 and
1.15 × 10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1, respectively, for ClO- + C2H5Cl.
This analysis suggests that the calculated results overestimate the
E2 rate constant by a factor of ∼6 and underestimate the SN2 rate
constant by a factor of ∼2.5. This magnitude of errors would occur
(24) Kato, S.; Davico, G. E.; Lee, H. S., DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum, V. M. Int.
J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 210/211, 223.
(25) Bierbaum, V. M.; Filley, J.; DePuy, C. H.; Jarrold, M. F.; Bowers, M. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2818.
(26) Based on the collision rate of 2.09 × 10-9 cm3 molecule-1 s-1, calculated
using the parametrized trajectory collision theory. [Su, T.; Chesnavich,
W. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 5183.]
(27) Baer, T.; Hase, W. L. Unimolecular Reaction Dynamics; Theory and
Experiment; Oxford University Press: New York, 1996.
(28) Graul, S. T.; Bowers, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3875.
(29) Tonner, D. S.; McMahon, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8783.
(30) Sun, L.; Song, K.; Hase, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5753.
(31) Sun, L.; Song, K.; Hase, W. L. Science 2002, 296, 875.
(32) Angel, L. A.; Ervin, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1014.
(33) Chabinyc, M. L.; Craig, S. L.; Regan, C. K.; Brauman, J. I. Science 1998,
279, 1882.
(34) Morris, R. A.; Viggiano, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 3740.
(35) Midey, A. J.; Viggiano, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 6786.
(36) Hu, W. P.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7797.
(37) O’Hair, R. A. J.; Davico, G. E.; Hacaloglu, J.; Dang, T. T.; DePuy, C.
H.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3609.
(38) Errors in the branching ratio would not affect the individual KIE because
the contributions from the barrier height, Eq, cancel out in the rate ratio.
(39) Zhao, Y.; Gonzalez-Garcia, N.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005,
109, 2012.
if the E2 barrier height was underestimated by only 1 kcal mol-1
while the SN2 barrier height was overestimated by only 0.6 kcal
,
JA057491D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 3, 2006 737