C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Epoxidation of Olefins with H2O2 Catalyzed by
W2/1-SiO2
activity and selectivity were comparable to those of the homoge-
neous analogue, showing that the homogeneous catalysis could be
heterogenized.
a
entry
olefin
time (h)
yield of epoxide (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
cis-2-octene
trans-2-octene
cis-â-methylstyrene
cyclohexene
2-norbornene
cycloheptene
cyclooctene
geraniol
3
7
2
3
2.5
2
1
4
4
>99b
73c
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Core
Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST)
program of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST)
and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Science, Sports and Technology of Japan.
>99b
80
80d
>99
>99
95e
Supporting Information Available: Experimental section, effect
of alkyl chain length on the N1 position of dihydroimidazolium cation
on the epoxidation of cyclooctene, and Figures S1-S5. This material
4-methyl-3-penten-2-ol
(Z)-3-methyl-3-penten-2-ol
90f
4
90g
a Reaction conditions: Olefin (1 mmol), catalyst (W2: 1 mol % with
respect to olefin), H2O2 (30% aq solution, 0.2 mmol), CH3CN (0.5 mL),
1
333 K. Yields and selectivities were determined by GC or H NMR with
References
an internal standard technique. Selectivities to the corresponding epoxides
were >95% in all cases. Yield (%) ) epoxide (mmol) per initial H2O2
(mmol) × 100. b Only cis. c Only trans. d Only exo. e Only 2,3-epoxide.
f threo/erythro ) 90/10. g threo/erythro ) 40/60.
(1) (a) Lane, B. S.; Burgess, K. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2457. (b)
Grigoropoulou, G.; Clark, J. H.; Elings, J. A. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 1
and references therein.
(2) (a) Neumann, R. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 47, 317. (b) Okuhara, T.;
Mizuno, N.; Misono, M. AdV. Catal. 1996, 41, 113. (c) Hill, C. L.; Prosser-
McCartha, C. M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1995, 143, 407. (d) Kozhevnikov,
I. V. Catalysis by Polyoxometalates; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester,
U.K., 2002.
(3) Venturello, C.; D’Aloisio, R. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1553.
(4) Ishii, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Ura, T.; Yamada, H.; Ogawa, M. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 3587.
(5) Noyori, R.; Aoki, M.; Sato, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1977.
(6) (a) Kamata, K.; Yonehara, K.; Sumida, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hikichi, S.;
Mizuno, N. Science 2003, 300, 964. (b) Kamata, K.; Yamaguchi, K.;
Mizuno, N. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4728. (c) Kamata, K.; Yamaguchi,
K.; Hikichi, S.; Mizuno, N. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1193.
(7) Dusi, M.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Catal. ReV. 2000, 42, 213.
(8) (a) Vasylev, M. V.; Neumann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 884. (b)
Musawir, M.; Davey, P. N.; Kelly, G.; Kozhevnikov, I. V. Chem. Commun.
2003, 1414. (c) Yamaguchi, K.; Mizuno, N. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 972.
(d) Okuhara, T. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3641 and references therein.
(9) (a) Sels, B. F.; De Vos, D. E.; Buntinx, M.; Pierard, F.; Mesmaeker, A.
K.-D.; Jacobs, P. A. Nature 1999, 400, 855. (b) Sels, B. F.; De Vos D.
E.; Jacobs, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8350. (c) Matsushita, T.;
Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Chem. Commun. 1999, 265. (d) Yamaguchi, K.;
Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 7144. (e) Mori, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.;
Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11573. (f) Yamaguchi, K.;
Mizuno, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4538. (g) Nozaki, C.;
Lugmair, C. G.; Bell. A. T.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
13194. (h) Fujdala, K. L.; Drake, I. J.; Bell. A. T.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10864.
Figure 1. Comparison of the reaction rates obtained by the use of W2/
1-SiO2 catalyst (heterogeneous) with those of [n-C12H25N (CH3)3]2[{W-
(dO)(O2)2(H2O)}2(µ-O)] (DTMA-W2, homogeneous) for the epoxidation
of olefins under the same reaction conditions. The reactions were carried
out under the conditions in Table 1. (1) 1-Octene, (2) trans-2-octene, (3)
2-norbornene, (4) 1-methyl-1-cyclohexene, (5) cyclohexene, (6) cis-2-octene,
and (7) cyclooctene.
(10) (a) Uozumi, Y.; Nakao, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 194. (b)
Leadbeater, N. E.; Marco, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3215. (c) McNamara,
C. A.; Dixon, M. J.; Bradley, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3275. (d)
Bergbreiter, D. E. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3345 and references therein.
(11) (a) Villa, A. L.; Sels, B. F.; De Vos, D. E.; Jacobs, P. A. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 7267. (b) Hoegaerts, D.; Sels, B. F.; De Vos, D. E.; Verpoort,
F.; Jacobs, P. A. Catal. Today 2000, 60, 209. (c) Neumann, R.; Cohen,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1738. (d) Sakamoto, T.; Pac,
C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 10009. (e) Neumann, R.; Miller, H. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 2277. (f) Gelbard, G.; Gauducheau,
T.; Vidal, E.; Parvulescu, V. I.; Crosman, A.; Pop, V. M. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2002, 182/183, 257. (g) Ichihara, J.; Yamaguchi, S.; Nomoto,
T.; Nakayama, H.; Iteya, K.; Naitoh, N.; Sasaki, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 8231.
methyl-3-penten-2-ol, in which 1,3- and 1,2-allylic strains compete
with each other, was more erthro-selective (threo/erythro ) 40/
60). A similar regio- and diastereoselectivity for allylic alcohols
was also observed for the homogeneous W2-catalyzed epoxidation.6b,c
The epoxidation was completely stopped by the catalyst removal
(Figure S5). It was confirmed by ICP-AES analysis that no tungsten
species could be detected in the filtrate (below detection limit of
16 ppb). Further, W2/1-SiO2 could be easily recovered by the
filtration and reused at least three times for the epoxidation of
cyclooctene without the loss of the catalytic activity and selectivity
(99% yield, >99% selectivity under the conditions in Table 1 after
the third recycle). The above results can rule out any contribution
to the observed catalysis from the tungsten species that leached
into the reaction solution, and the observed catalysis is truly
heterogeneous in nature.
The catalytic activity of W2/1-SiO2 was compared with that of
the corresponding homogeneous analogue of [n-C12H25N(CH3)3]2-
[{W(dO)(O2)2(H2O)}2(µ-O)] (DTMA-W2) under the same condi-
tions. As shown in Figure 1, the reaction rates by the use of W2/
1-SiO2 were comparable to those of DTMA-W2. This fact
indicates that the homogeneous catalysis can be heterogenized with
retention of the W2 catalyst performance by the support on ionic
liquid-modified SiO2.
(12) A tungstate-exchanged layered double hydroxide, WO42-(MgAl)LDH, was
more than 100 times more active for oxidative bromination and bromide-
assisted epoxidation than the homogeneous analogue of NaWO4. See refs
9a and b.
(13) The sandwich-type polyoxometalate, [(Fe(OH2)2)3(A-R-PW9O34)2]9-, elec-
trostatically immobilized on cationic silica/alumina nanoparticles was more
active than the same quantity of the parent polyoxometalate for the aerobic
oxygenation of sulfides and autoxidation of aldehyde. See: (a) Okun, N.
M.; Anderson, T. M.; Hill, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3194. (b)
Okun, N. M.; Anderson, T. M.; Hill, C. L. J. Mol. Catal. 2003, 197, 283.
(14) Similar ionic liquid fragments have been confined onto solid supports
and then treated with catalytically active species such as Lewis acids and
Rh complexes to generate surface-immobilized catalysts. See: (a) Valk-
enberg, M. H.; deCastro, C.; Ho¨lderich, W. F. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 215,
185. (b) Mehnert, C. P.; Cook, R. A.; Dispenziere, N. C.; Afeworki, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12932. (c) Mehnert, C. P.; Mozeleski, E.
J.; Cook, R. A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3010.
(15) We synthesized W2 supported on triethylammonium cation-grafted SiO2.
The yield of cyclooctene oxide under the conditions in Table 1 was 14%
and much lower than that with W2/1-SiO2.
In conclusion, W2/1-SiO2 was capable of heterogeneously
epoxidizing a broad range of olefins with high selectivity. The
JA043688E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 2, 2005 531