K.A. Ahmad et al.
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 106 (2018) 1734–1741
Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The absorbance of untreated cells was
regarded as 100% of cell survival. Cell Viability = (treated viable cells)
and the protein concentration of each sample was determined using a
BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, US) according to the manufacturer in-
structions. The lysates were denatured by boiling them in the SDS
sample buffer. Then equal amounts of protein (50 g) from each group
were loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes
/
(non-treated control viable cells) × 100%.
2 2
2.5. Cell viability assay of HUVECs damage by H O
(
Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked for 1 in
To study the protective effects of BEG in HUVECs damaged by
5% phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% (v/v) tween 20
and 5% non-fat dry milk and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with
primary antibody against eNOS or phospho-eNOS or Akt, or phospho-
Akt Ser 473, and β-actin. The dilution factor for the primary antibodies
against 1:500 eNOS, 1:500 phospho-eNOS,1: 1000 Akt, 1: 1000 p-Akt
and 1: 1000 β-actin. After washing, the membranes were incubated
with the anti-IgG secondary antibody (1:2000) conjugated to horse-
radish peroxide for 1 h at room temperature. Then the membranes were
washed in TBST for 30 min and exposed to enhanced chemilumines-
cence reagents. Densitometric analysis was performed to quantify the
signal intensity. β-actin was used as a standard reference. The relative
density of each protein band was normalized to β-actin.
oxidative stress, MTT cell assay was used as described above with some
modification. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103
cells/well. After 24 h incubation, HUVECs were pre-treated with dif-
ferent concentrations of BEG (0.1, 1, 10 μM) and 100 μM Vitamin E
(
positive control) for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO
cells were treated with 0.5 mM H for further 2 h. The model group
alone for 2 h while the control
2
incubator. Then, these
2 2
O
cells were incubated with 0.5 mM H
2 2
O
group was kept untreated.
2
.6. Measurement of LDH, NO, SOD and MDA
The contents of LDH, NO, SOD and MDA were determined by fol-
lowing the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng
Bioengineering Institute Nanjing, China). All procedures entirely de-
scribed previously [11,17]. The levels of LDH, NO, SOD and MDA were
expressed as unit’s micromoles per liter supernatant, units per liter
supernatant, per milligram protein and nanomoles per milligram pro-
tein, respectively. The absorbance of LDH, NO, SOD and MDA were
measured at wavelengths of 440, 550, 550 and 530 nm respectively.
Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
2.10. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Version
7.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Data were expressed as means ± S.D
from three independent experiments. The ANOVA test was used to
determine the statistical significance. The P value (p < 0.05) was
considered significant among all the analysis.
3. Results
2.7. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay
3.1. Cytotoxic effect of BEG in HUVECs
Intracellular ROS generation was investigated using ROS detection
kit following the manufacturer instructions. Briefly, HUVECs were in-
cubated with different concentrations of BEG for 24 h and then stimu-
lated with 0.5 mM H O for further 2 h, the control group was left
2 2
untreated. After that, HUVECs were labeled with 10 μM DCFH-DA and
incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After three times washes with PBS, the
DCFH fluorescence of the cells from individual cells was measured at
excitation and emission wavelengths, 485 nm and 530 nm respectively,
Cytotoxicity of BEG in HUVECs was investigated using MTT assay.
Our results indicated that incremental doses of BEG treatment for 24 h
did not produce any obvious cytotoxic effect (Fig. 3A). Therefore, doses
of 0.1 μmol/L, 1 μmol/L, and 10 μmol/L of BEG were used in the sub-
sequent experiments for examining its possible protective role against
H
2
O
2
induced toxicity.
using
a
fluorescence microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf,
3.2. Effect of BEG on H O induced HUVECs damage
2 2
Switzerland). ROS fluorescent intensity index was expressed as the
percentage of the control group fluorescence intensity. Each experiment
was performed in triplicate.
In order to evaluate whether BEG protects HUVECs against oxida-
tive stress, cell viability was measured by MTT assay. As shown in
(
Fig. 3B), the control group did not show any significant difference
while the model group incubated with H alone for 2 h decreased the
cell viability to 63%. In the treated group, treatment of BEG reduced the
cell growth inhibition caused by H and increased the cell viability in
2
.8. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of mRNA expression
2 2
O
Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect eNOS mRNA ex-
2 2
O
pression in each group. HUVECs were treated with BEG (0.1, 1, 10 μM)
a dose-dependent manner. The cell viability was restored up to
97.6667% by pretreatment with 10 μmol/L of BEG, which was almost
superior to the positive control group (100 μM Vit-E).
for 24 h and then stimulated with (0.5 Mm) H for further 2 h. Total
2 2
O
RNA was extracted by trizol reagent according to the manufacturer
instructions (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized with Prime Script RT
Master Mix kit (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer instructions.
cDNAs were used for PCR amplification using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM
2 2
3.3. Effect of BEG on H O induced LDH leakage in HUVECs
(
Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer instructions on ABI
Increased LDH release from HUVECs into the culture medium also
Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).
β-actin was used as an internal control. Primer sequences were as fol-
lows: 5′-AAG ATC TCC GCC TCG CTC A-3′(sense) and 5′-GCT GTT GAA
GCG GAT CTT A-3′(antisense) for eNOS; 5′-CGC AAA GAC CTG TAC
GCC AAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CAC GGA GTA CTT GCG CTC AGG-3′(an-
tisense) for β-actin.
reflects cells damage. Therefore, LDH leakage was investigated to fur-
ther confirm the protective effect of BEG on H O induced HUVECs
2 2
damage. For this purpose, cells were pretreated with different con-
centrations of BEG (0.1, 1, 10 μmol/L) and Vit E 100 μM for 24 h fol-
lowed by further treatment with 0.5 mM H
(Fig. 4A), cells treated with 0.5 mM H O
2 2
2
O
2
for 2 h. As shown in
alone for 2 h significantly
increased cells LDH leakage into the medium, while pretreatment of
2.9. Western blot analysis
HUVECs with various concentrations of BEG inhibited H
LDH leakage in a dose-dependent manner.
2 2
O -induced
Cells were treated as described above. HUVECs were washed twice
with ice-cold PBS and then lysed by using RIPA lysis buffer containing
3.4. Antioxidant effect of BEG against H
2 2
O induced HUVECs damage
1
1
% PMSF at 4 °C. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000g at 4 °C for
5 min to remove the insoluble materials. Supernatants were collected
SOD activity and MDA content were evaluated to reflect the level of
1736