774
O¨ . Temiz Arpacı et al. / Il Farmaco 57 (2002) 771ꢀ
775
/
Table 2
The in vitro antimicrobial activity of the compounds 4ꢀ
2.5. Antibacterial and antifungal assay
/
11 and the
ꢁ
1
control drugs (MIC in mg ml
)
The cultures were obtained from Muellerꢀ
broth (Difco) for all the bacterial strains after 24 h of
incubation at 3791 8C. The yeast C. albicans was
maintained in Sabouraud dextrose broth (Difco) after
incubation for 24 h at 2591 8C. Testing was carried out
in MuellerꢀHinton broth and Sabouraud dextrose broth
Difco) at pH 7.4 and the two-fold serial dilution
/
Hinton
/
/
/
Comp. No.
Sa
Sf
12.5
Bs
Ec
50
Ca
(
5
technique was applied. The final inoculum size was 10
ꢁ
4
5
6
7
8
9
100
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
25
50
50
50
50
12.5
25
50
25
25
50
25
50
1
4
for the antibacterial assay and 10 CFU
CFU ml
ꢁ
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
25
50
100
50
1
ml for the antifungal assay. A set of tubes containing
only inoculated broth was kept as controls. For the
25
25
antibacterial assay after incubation for 24 h at 379
and after incubation for 48 h at 2591 8C for the
/
1 8C
/
1
1
0
1
25
50
antifungal assay, the last tube with no growth of
microorganism and/or yeast was recorded to represent
Ampicillin
1.56
1.56
1.56
12.5
3.12
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
6.2
3.1
ꢁ
1
Amoxycillin
Tetracycline
Streptomycin
Clotrimazole
Haloprogin
1.56
1.56
3.12
1.56
1.56
1.56
1.56
the MIC expressed in mg ml . Every experiment in the
antibacterial and antifungal assays was replicated twice
in order to define the MIC values.
3.12
1.56
100
50
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
ꢀ/
Ampicillin, amoxycillin, tetracycline, streptomycin,
ketoconazole and fluconazole were used as control
drugs. The observed data on the antimicrobial activity
of the compounds and the control drugs are given in
Table 2.
Sa, Staphylococcus aureus; Ec, Escherichia coli; Sf, Streptococcus
faecalis; Bs, Bacillus subtilis, Ca, Candida albicans.
2
.4. Microbiology
3. Results and discussion
The compounds were dissolved in absolute ethanol
1
The chemical, physical and spectral data of the
(
0.8 mg/mlꢁ ) for both the antibacterial and antimyco-
synthesized compounds 4ꢀ11 are reported in Table 1.
/
tic assays. Further dilutions of the compounds and
standard drugs in the test medium were prepared at the
required quantities of 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25,
The antimicrobial activity of the compounds was
investigated against S. aureus, S. faecalis, B. subtilis
as Gram-positive, E. coli as Gram-negative bacteria
strains and the yeast C. albicans using two-fold serial
dilution technique in comparison to control drugs and
the results reported at Table 2.
ꢁ
1
3
.12, 1.56, 0.78 mg/ml
concentrations with Muellerꢀ
/
Hinton broth and Sabouraud dextrose broth. The
minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were deter-
mined using the method of two-fold serial dilution
technique [12,13]. In order to ensure that the solvent
per se had no effect on bacterial growth, a control test
was also performed containing inoculated broth supple-
mented with only ethanol at the same dilutions used in
our experiments and found inactive in culture medium.
All the compounds were tested for their in vitro growth
inhibitory activity against different bacteria and the
yeast C. albicans RSKK 628. Origin of bacterial strains
are Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Streptococcus
faecalis ATCC 10541 and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6033
as Gram-positive and Escherichia coli ATCC 10536 as
Gram-negative bacteria. RSKK strains of the micro-
organisms used in this study were obtained from the
culture collection of Refik Saydam Health Institution of
Health Ministry, Ankara and maintained at the Micro-
biology Department of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara
University.
The synthesized compounds showed some antibacter-
ial activity against the Gram-positive bacteria such as S.
aureus and B. subtilis possessing MIC values 25ꢀ100 mg/
/
ꢁ
1
ml . All the compounds showed weak to moderate
antibacterial activity against S. faecalis possessing MIC
ꢁ
1
values in the range 12.5ꢀ
/
25 mg/ml
.
The compounds 4ꢀ11 were also tested against C.
/
albicans for their antimycotic activity and most of the
compounds indicated significant antimycotic activity
ꢁ
1
(
MIC values around 12.5ꢀ
/
50 mg/ml ), but generally
inferior to that of antimycotic potencies of clotrimazole
ꢁ1
and haloprogin (MIC values of 6.2 and 3.1 mg ml
respectively).
,
Finally, we compared the antimicrobial activity of
synthesized benzamide and phenylacetamide derivatives
[
11] with their cyclohexyl analogues 4ꢀ11. It appears
/
that benzamide and phenylacetamide derivatives
showed same or better antifungal and antibacterial
activities against C. albicans, S. aureus, B. subtilis and