The generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from the Deamination of 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules25020261

A novel generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes via the deamination of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[s3,4-b]indoles is reported.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules25020261

molecules
Article
The Generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from
the Deamination of
1
,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles
Alison Rinderspacher and Gordon W. Gribble *
Department of Chemistry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; alison.rinderspacher@gmail.com
*
Correspondence: ggribble@dartmouth.edu; Tel.: +1-603-646-3118
ꢀ
ꢁꢂꢀꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
Academic Editor: David StC Black
Received: 10 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 9 January 2020
ꢀ
ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Abstract: A novel generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes via the deamination of 1,2,3,4-
tetrahydropyrrolo[s3,4-b]indoles is reported.
Keywords: indole; indole-2,3-quinodimethane; 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole; deamination;
Angeli’s salt
1
. Introduction
As an offshoot of the venerable o-quinodimethanes [1–5], indole-2,3-quinodimethanes have risen
to a position of importance in indole chemistry and they have a fascinating history of exploration and
synthetic applications [6–15].
In continuation of our synthesis and chemistry of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles [16
–22], we now report
the first generation of an indole-2,3-quinodimethane ( ) species from the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (2)
1
ring system (Figure 1). Given the availability of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles and, in particular, 1,2,3,4-
tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles (i.e., 2), this possible pathway to the indole-2,3-quinodimethane ring
system appeared to be novel and attractive.
NH
N
H
N
H
2
1
Figure 1. Retrosynthesis of indole-2,3-quinodimethane (1) from 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (2).
Moreover, the early work of Lemal and McGregor on the generation of dienes via the stereospecific
deamination of 3-pyrrolines with Angeli’s salt (Scheme 1) proffered the feasibility of our concept [23,24].
–
N2
Na N O
+
2
2
3
–
N N
NH
dil HCl
heat
86%
Scheme 1. Deamination of 3-pyrrolines with Angeli’s salt.
We initially focused on the generation of 2,3-diethylidene-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indoline
3 from
2
,3-diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole ( ) (Scheme 2). However, our first synthesis of from 2-iodoaniline
8
8
Molecules 2020, 25, 261; doi:10.3390/molecules25020261
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
2 of 11
via a Larock indolization [25] with 3-hexyne, followed by indole N-phenylsulfonylation proceeded
poorly (not shown). Therefore, we adopted the successful route shown in Scheme 2. Indole ( ) was
converted to 1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole ( ) in standard fashion [26]. Treatment of with sec-BuLi (or LDA)
and quenching with iodoethane gave 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole ( ) in 63% yield. Exposure of
to acetic anhydride and AlCl in dichloromethane afforded 3-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole
4
5
5
6
6
3
(7) in 65% yield [27]. The structure of
7 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Interestingly,
the reverse sequence of initial C-3 acetylation/reduction followed by C-2 lithiation to give
7
failed, probably due to steric hindrance imparted by the C-3 ethyl group. This was verified by
lithiation of 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole and quenching with iodomethane to give only traces
of 3-ethyl-2-methyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. Reduction of
7 with NaBH /CF CO H generated
4 3 2
2
,3-diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole ( ) in 60% yield. On occasion we found that this reduction
8
stopped at the alcohol stage, the product of which upon treatment with base led to loss of acetaldehyde
giving 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. This novel retro-aldol-type reaction was discovered by
us many years ago [28]. Indole
to give the desired dibromoindole
,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole 10 with benzylamine, and then debenzylated using Yang’s
method [29] to give the hydrochloride salt 11. Treatment of 11 with Angeli’s salt (Na N O ) in
8
was treated with N-bromosuccinimide and benzoyl peroxide
9
in high yield. In a two-step sequence was converted to
9
1
2
2
3
the presence of dilute acid gave 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13) via diazine 12 and
deamination to generate 2,3-diethylidene 3 via a [1,5-H] shift in 18% overall yield from 9.
1
2
. NaOH, CH Cl2
1. s-BuLi, THF
–78 °C to rt
Ac O, AlCl
2 3
n Bu NHSO , 0 °C
4
4
CH Cl , 0 ‚C
2 2
N
H
N
N
SO Ph
65%
2
. PhSO Cl
2
SO Ph
4
2
5
2. EtI
63%
6
2
94%
O
Br
NBS
PhCH NH
2
NaBH4
2
N
CF CO H
N
BzOOH
N
K
2
CO
, THF
3
3
2
Br
CCl , reflux
reflux
SO Ph
CH Cl , 0 °C
8
SO
Ph
2
4
SO Ph
2
7
2
2
2
81%
60%
9
-
Cl
–
1
. ClCO CH(Cl)CH3
+
N
2
+
N
NH
Na
N
2
O
2
3
N
Ph
2
HCl, MeOH
N
2. MeOH, reflux
N
N
SO Ph
SO Ph
SO Ph
2
2
2
10 (+ isomer)
11
12
–
N2
[1,5-H]
18% from 9
N
N
SO
SO Ph
Ph
2
2
3
(+ isomers)
13
Scheme 2.
Deamination of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (11) leading to 3-ethyl-1-
(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13).
The structure of 13 as opposed to the isomeric 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14
was established by both 2D NMR and an independent synthesis of 14 (Scheme 3). In the latter
event, reduction of 3-acetylindole afforded alcohol 15, which was converted to mesylate 16 using
Bassoli’s procedure [30]. During the reaction 16 eliminated methanesulfonate to give 2-ethyl-1-
)
7

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
3 of 11
(
phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14) in modest yield. The NMR data (COSY, NOESY, chemical shifts)
clearly distinguished 3-vinylindole 14 from 2-vinylindole 13. This observation of a [1,5-H] shift ( to
) during the formation of an indole-2,3-quinodiethane has been reported by Pindur [31] in his study
3
1
3
of 1,4-dimethylpyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-one, and by Bergman [32] and Kano [33] during their syntheses
of ellipticine.
O
HO
MsCl
NaBH4
N
EtOH, THF
N
Et N, CH Cl
2
3
2
SO Ph
H O, 0 °C
2
SO Ph
2
2
7
94%
15
MsO
–
MsOH
27% (2 steps)
N
N
SO Ph
2
SO Ph
2
16
14
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14).
To preclude the [1,5-H] shift process, we turned our attention to the possible generation of
indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 as shown in Scheme 4. N-phenylsulfonylation of 2,3-dimethylindole
(18) gave 19, which was brominated as per Srinivasan [34
,35] to give dibromide 20. Treatment of 20
with benzylamine afforded tetrahydropyrrole 21 in 62% yield. Debenzylation [29] with
α
-chloroethyl
chloroformate gave the hydrochloride salt 22 in 86% yield. Treatment of 22 with Angeli’s salt in the
presence of dilute HCl in aqueous MeOH generated indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 via diazine 23, and 17
dimerzied to the dimer 24 in 23% yield from 22. A similar dimerization of an indole-2,3-quinodimethane
was described by Martinelli who isolated the BOC-protected version of 24 [6].
Br
PhCH
CO
2
NH
2
KH, THF
NBS
Br
K
2
3
, THF
N
H
PhSO Cl
N
BzOOH
N
2
reflux
0
°C
CCl , reflux
2
SO Ph
SO
2
Ph
4
18
19
20
46%
69%
62%
-
Cl
2 3
1. ClCO CH(Cl)CH
+
Na
2 2 3
N O
N
NH
2
Ph
HCl, MeOH
N
2. MeOH, reflux
6%
N
SO
2
Ph
2
SO Ph
8
21
22
2
SO Ph
N
–
+
N
–
N
2
N
N
N
23% from 22
N
SO
2
Ph
SO
2
Ph
SO Ph
2
17
23
24
Scheme 4. Deamination of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole 22 leading to 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dimethylene-1-
phenylsulfonyl)indole (17) and dimer 24.
(

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
4 of 11
Attempts to trap 17 with p-benzoquinone and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate have been
unsuccessful. For identification with the anticipated adduct of p-benzoquinone with 17, we prepared
adduct 25 following Cava’s conditions [36] (Scheme 5).
O
O
Br
O
Br
25%
N
N
N
NaI, DMF
O
SO Ph
SO Ph
2
SO Ph
2
2
60 - 70 °C
20
17
25
Scheme 5. Synthesis of p-benzoquinone indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 adduct 25.
The lack of our attempts thus far to trap indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 with external dienophiles
is puzzling, but the isolation of both 2-vinylindole 13 and dimer 24 we believe is clear and convincing
evidence of the novel generation of the respective indole-2,3-quinodimethanes
,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles.
3 and 17 from
1
2
. Experimental
2
.1. General Methods
1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity Plus 300 or 500 T NMR
spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million using the residual proton or carbon
signal (CDCl3: 7.27, 77.23) as an internal reference. The apparent multiplicity (s = singlet, d =
δ
H
δ
C
doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), and coupling constants (in Hz) are reported in that
order in parentheses after the chemical shift. All melting points were determined on a Mel-Temp
Laboratory Devices apparatus and are reported uncorrected. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was
®
performed on Whatman regular TLC plates. Developed TLC plates were visualized using a 254-nm
UV lamp and/or iodine. Flash chromatography employed 230–400 mesh Silicycle® silica gel. Infrared
spectra (IR) were recorded with a Perkin Elmer® Series 1600 Fourier transform IR and are reported in
reciprocal centimeters. IR spectra were obtained either by dissolving the sample in tetrachloroethene
(
TCE) or by making salt plates with potassium bromide (KBr). Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded
on an Agilent Technologies 8453 UV spectrophotometer. Gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectra
MS) were performed on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5000 gas chromatograph mass spectrometer. Elemental
(
analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab Inc. (Norcross, GA, USA). X-ray crystallography was
performed by Professor Jerry Jasinski at Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA. High-resolution mass
spectrometry was done at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign). Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was
dried on a commercial silica gel drying column before use. All alkyllithium reagents were purchased
®
®
®
from either Aldrich , Acros , or Alfa Aesar and were titrated when necessary with diphenylacetic
◦
◦
acid. Temperatures of
−
78 C were achieved by using an acetone/dry ice bath. Temperatures of 10 C
−
were reached by employing a sodium chloride solution/ice bath. All reaction flasks were oven-dried at
40 C. Inert atmospheres of nitrogen were pre-dried by flow through a column of Drierite 4 mesh with
◦
1
indicator. All reactions were done under a positive flow of nitrogen unless otherwise stated. Degassing
was accomplished with a manifold using the freeze, pump, and thaw method with nitrogen.
2
.2. 1-(Phenylsulfonyl)indole (5)
A mixture of indole ( ) (11.8 g, 0.101 mol), sodium hydroxide (12.9 g, 0.323 mol), and tetra-
n-butylammonium hydrogen sulfate (1.30 g, 0.00383 mol) was stirred in methylene chloride (100 mL
4
)

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
5 of 11
◦
at 0 C. A solution of benzenesulfonyl chloride (15.5 mL, 0.122 mol) in methylene chloride (40 mL)
was added dropwise via addition funnel. Upon addition of the solution the color of the suspension
turned from grayish to blue to dark red. After 40 min it had turned light orange and it was allowed
to warm to room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite pad and the
solvent was evaporated in vacuo, leaving a red oil behind. The oil was treated with methanol
◦
(
40 mL) and was subsequently stored at 4 C. Crystal formation was observed almost instantaneously.
Pale peach-colored crystals of
5
were obtained after vacuum filtration (24.4 g, 0.0948 mol, 94%): mp
◦
◦
1
7
5.5–77 C (lit. [37] mp 77.5–79 C); H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
8.01 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.89 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz),
3
7.58 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.53 (d, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 7.45 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.23
(d, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz); UV λmax (95% EtOH) 212, 250, 283 nm.
2
.3. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (6)
sec-Butyllithium in hexane (1.4 M, 4.10 mL, 5.74 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe to a solution
◦
of 1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (5) (1.22 g, 4.75 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL) at −78 C
. The resulting
bright orange solution was stirred for 30 min, after which iodoethane (0.38 mL, 4.75 mmol) was added
quickly via syringe. The dark orange-brown solution was allowed to warm to room temperature and
was subsequently poured onto saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (50 mL). The organic layer was
extracted with diethyl ether (3
×
25 mL), washed with brine (2
×
25 mL), and dried with anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give clear, colorless crystals of 6 (0.858 g,
◦
◦
1
3
.00 mmol, 63%): mp 97–97.5 C (lit. [38] mp 96–97.5 C); H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
8.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz),
3
7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.53 (t, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.45–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 2H), 6.41 (s, 1H), 3.04
(q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.36 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz).
2
.4. 3-Acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7)
Aluminum chloride (0.57 g, 4.3 mmol) and acetic anhydride (0.20 mL, 2.1 mmol) were stirred in
◦
methylene chloride (20 mL) at 0 C. After 20 min a solution of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (6)
(
0.19 g, 0.67 mmol) in methylene chloride (3.5 mL) was added dropwise to the yellow suspension via
◦
addition funnel. The solution was stirred for 2.5 h at 0 C, after which it was poured over crushed
ice (~100 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3
×
20 mL), washed with
brine (2 25 mL) and saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (25 mL), and was dried with anhydrous
×
magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated on the rotary evaporator, yielding a brown oil, which
◦
was stored at 4 C. White crystals of 7 were obtained after vacuum filtration (0.14 g, 0.44 mmol, 65%):
◦
◦
1
mp 71–73 C (lit. [39] mp 92–93 C); H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
8.30–8.28 (m, 1H), 7.90–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.81
3
(
7
d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.59 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.47 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.37–7.33 (m, 2H), 3.38 (q, 2H, J =
.5 Hz), 2.66 (s, 3H), 1.37 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); C-NMR (CDCl ) δ 195.9, 149.7, 139.2, 136.3, 134.5, 129.8
3
13
(
1
2C), 127.4, 126.7 (2C), 125.0, 124.7, 121.0, 120.5, 115.2, 32.3, 21.1, 15.6; IR ν(TCE) 3394, 2978, 2471, 1884,
−1
801, 1672, 1533, 1448, 1385, 1224, 1182, 1122, 1093, 1056 cm
.
2
.5. 2,3-Diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (8)
A sodium borohydride pellet (1.1 g, 29 mmol) was partially dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid
◦
(
25 mL) at 0 C under nitrogen. A solution of 3-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7) (0.52 g,
1
.6 mmol) in methylene chloride (30 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel. The yellow solution
was stirred overnight. It was diluted with distilled water (75 mL) and basified with sodium hydroxide
pellets. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 50 mL), washed with brine
×
(
3 × 50 mL), and was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated on the
rotary evaporator, yielding white crystals with a tiny amount of red-brown oil. The product was
purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes:ethyl acetate) to give 8 as a yellowish, crystalline
◦
1
substance (0.30 g, 0.96 mmol, 60%): mp 87–88 C; H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
8.19 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.68
d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.49 (t, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.42 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.38 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.28–7.22
m, 2H), 3.01 (q, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.63 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.31 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.17 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz);
3
(
(

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
6 of 11
13C-NMR (CDCl3)
δ
139.3, 138.8, 137.0, 133.6, 130.9, 129.3 (2C), 126.4 (2 C), 124.2, 123.6, 123.0, 118.7,
1
3
6
15.5, 20.0, 17.7, 16.0, 15.0; MS m/z 313 (M), 172 (100%), 157, 144, 115, 77; HRMS Calcd for C H NO S:
18 19 2
13.1136; Found: 313.1138; Anal. Calcd for C H NO S: C, 68.98; H, 6.11; N, 4.47; S, 10.23. Found: C,
18
19
2
9.22; H, 6.06; N, 4.48; S, 10.07.
2
.6. 2,3-Bis-(1-bromoethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (9)
,3-Diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole ( ) (0.477 g, 1.52 mmol) was stirred in carbon tetrachloride
20 mL). N-Bromosuccinimide (0.548 g, 3.08 mmol) and benzoyl peroxide (0.0535 g, 0.387 mmol) were
2
8
(
added. The orange suspension was heated to reflux for 2.5 h, after which it was allowed to cool to
room temperature. The light orange-brown reaction mixture was poured onto distilled water (50 mL).
The organic layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3
and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding
a red-brown oil (0.579 g, 1.23 mmol, 81%); MS m/z 471 (M), 166, 115, 84 (100%); HRMS Calcd for
C H Br NO S: 468.9347; Found: 468.9357.
×
25 mL), washed with distilled water (2 × 25 mL),
9
as
18
17
2
2
2
.7. 2-Benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,8-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (10)
A solution of benzylamine (0.16 mL, 1.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added slowly via
addition funnel to a refluxing orange suspension of 2,3-bis-(1-bromoethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole
) (0.58 g, 1.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.58 g, 4.2 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL). It was
(
9
refluxed for 14 h after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature. The light orange suspension
was filtered through a Celite pad with methylene chloride. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo
yielding 10 as an orange oil, which was immediately taken on to the next step without further
purification: MS m/z 311 (M − 105), 170 (100%), 142, 115, 106, 91, 77.
2
.8. 1,3-Dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole Hydrogen Chloride (11)
A solution of -chloroethyl chloroformate (0.17 mL, 1.5 mmol) in anhydrous methylene
chloride (20 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel to the reaction mixture of crude
α
2
-benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,8-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (10) (0.51 g, 1.2 mmol)
◦
in anhydrous methylene chloride (30 mL), with stirring at
−
10 C. The reaction mixture turned
orange-brown. After 35 min the solvent was removed via vacuum pump. Methanol (20 mL) was
added to the orange-brown residue. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 55 min, after which it was
allowed to cool to room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo yielding 11 as a brown oil
with a white solid. This crude product was taken on to the next step without any further purification:
MS m/z 363 (M), 220 (100%), 141, 114, 77.
2
.9. 3-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13)
The crude product 11 (0.45 g, 1.2 mmol) was stirred in a mixture of methanol (20 mL) and
distilled water (20 mL) at room temperature. Angeli’s salt (0.12 g, 1.2 mmol) was added quickly to the
latt -colored reaction mixture. Hydrochloric acid (0.6 M, 2.1 mL, 1.2 mmol) was added via syringe.
é
The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at room temperature, after which it was refluxed for 90 min
◦
and allowed to cool to room temperature, then cooled to
−
78 C, and allowed to gradually warm to
room temperature. Methylene chloride (20 mL) was added to the yellow-brown reaction mixture and
the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 20 mL) and
the combined organic extracts were washed with distilled water (2 30 mL), and dried with anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to afford a red-brown oil, which was purified
via column chromatography, using first hexanes and then methylene chloride as eluent. The final
fractions of the first column were purified via column chromatography, employing first n-pentane
×
×
and then methylene chloride as eluent. Indole 13 was obtained as an orange oil (0.069 g, 0.22 mmol,
1
1
8%, 3 steps): H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
8.21 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.88–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz),
3
7
.55–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.35 (t, 3H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.28 (t, 3H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (q, 1H, J = 11.4 Hz), 5.60 (dd, 1H,
X

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
7 of 11
JM = 11.4 Hz), 5.41 (dd, 1H, J = 17.4 Hz), 2.73 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.17 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR
A
(
CDCl3)
δ
133.7, 129.0 (3C), 128.0, 127.2, 126.9 (3C), 125.2, 123.9, 119.5, 115.5, 18.2, 15.1; MS m/z 311 (M),
1
70, 154, 144, 115, 84 (100%), 77, 51; HRMS calcd for C H O NS: 311.0980; Found: 311.0971.
18
17
2
2
.10. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indol-3-yl-ethanol (15)
Ethanol (15 mL) and distilled water (15 mL) were added to
a
solution of
3
-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (
7
) (0.107 g, 0.325 mmol) in THF (10 mL), and stirred
◦
at room temperature. The light-orange reaction mixture was cooled to 0 C. Sodium borohydride
powder (0.0272 g, 0.719 mmol) was added quickly. The pale yellow reaction mixture was stirred
overnight and then poured onto brine (100 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene
chloride (3
×
25 mL), washed with brine (2
×
40 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate.
1
The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give 15 as a pale yellow oil (0.100 g, 0.305 mmol, 94%): H-NMR
(CDCl3) δ 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.72 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.49 (t, 1H, J = 8.0
Hz), 7.38 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.28 (t, 1H, J = 11.0 Hz), 7.23 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.17 (q, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz),
3
.16–3.09 (m, 1H), 3.03–2.95 (m, 1H), 1.58 (d, 3H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.29 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3)
δ
139.2, 138.7, 137.0, 133.8, 129.3 (2C), 128.4, 126.3 (2C), 124.3, 123.6, 120.7, 115.2, 64.2, 23.7, 19.9, 16.1; IR
ν
(TCE) 3383, 3069, 2976, 2933, 2876, 1761, 1604, 1449, 1376, 1226, 1177, 1092, 1053, 957, 776, 752, 686,
5
84; MS m/z 311 (M − 18), 170 (100%), 155, 143, 128, 115, 77.
2
.11. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14)
Methanesulfonyl chloride (0.03 mL, 0.4 mmol) and triethylamine (0.5 mL, 4 mmol) were added
via syringe to a solution of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-indol-3-yl-ethanol (15) (0.1 g, 0.3 mmol) in
anhydrous methylene chloride (15 mL), while stirring at room temperature. The solution was stirred
for 7 days after which methylene chloride (25 mL) and saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (30 mL
)
were added. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 25 mL), washed with
×
saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (30 mL) and distilled water (30 mL), and dried with anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo affording a yellow oil which was purified
via column chromatography (first 2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate, then methylene chloride). Indole 14 was
1
obtained as a yellow oil (0.03 g, 0.09 mmol, 27%, 2 steps): H-NMR (CDCl )
δ 8.23 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz),
3
7.73 (d, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz), 752 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.40 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.33–7.26 (m, 2H), 6.76 (q, 1H,
J = 11.5 Hz), 5.75 (dd, 1H, JM = 17.5 Hz), 5.45 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.11 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.32
X
A
(
t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3)
δ
133.8 (2C), 129.4 (3C), 127.7, 126.4 (3C), 124.5 (2C), 124.0, 119.9,
1
16.9, 115.2 (2C), 20.1, 15.5; HRMS calcd for C H O NS: 311.0980; Found: 311.0977.
18 17 2
2
.12. 2,3-Dimethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (19)
Potassium hydride (2.62 g of 30 wt% mineral oil dispersion, 65.2 mmol) was washed with hexanes
20 mL, 2 10 mL). The remaining hexanes were removed in vacuo. Anhydrous THF (40 mL) was
added via cannula. A solution of 2,3-dimethylindole (18) (2.01 g, 13.8 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL
(
1
×
×
)
was added via cannula to the white suspension. Benzenesulfonyl chloride (1.77 mL, 13.8 mmol) was
added dropwise via syringe to the yellow-brown reaction mixture. The reaction mixture turned
green. It was poured onto crushed ice (250 mL). The organic layer was extracted with diethyl ether
(
3 × 60 mL), washed with brine (2
×
60 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent
was evaporated in vacuo yielding 19 as white-brown crystals, which were washed with methanol to
give white crystals (1.81 g, 6.34 mmol, 46%): mp 131–133 C (lit. [35] mp 140 C); H-NMR (CDCl )
◦
◦
1
δ
3
8.20 (d, 1h, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.43–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.31–7.24
(m, 3H), 2.53 (s, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H).
2
.13. 2,3-Bis(bromomethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (20)
,3-Dimethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (19) (1.03 g, 3.61 mmol), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (1.33
g, 7.39 mmol), and benzoyl peroxide (0.12 g, 0.87 mmol) were stirred in carbon tetrachloride (47 mL).
2

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
8 of 11
The yellow reaction mixture was heated to reflux and refluxed for 3.5 h, after which it was allowed to
cool to room temperature. The succinimide was filtered off via gravity filtration and then through
a cotton plug. Distilled water was added (50 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene
chloride (3
×
50 mL), washed with brine (2
×
50 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate.
The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give 20 as yellow crystals, which were recrystallized with 4:1
◦
◦
1
hexanes:methylene chloride (1.11 g, 2.50 mmol, 69%): mp 132–133 C (lit. [35] mp 138 C); H-NMR
CDCl ) δ 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.64–7.35 (m, 5H), 5.15 (s, 2H), 4.67 (s, 2H).
(
3
2
.14. 2-Benzyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (21)
A solution of benzylamine (0.09 mL, 0.8 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added dropwise
via addition funnel to a refluxing brown suspension of 2,3-dibromomethyl-1-phenylsulfonyl)indole
20) (0.31 g, 0.60 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.35 g, 2.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL). After
5 h the yellow-brown suspension was allowed to cool to room temperature and was filtered through a
(
1
Celite pad with ethyl acetate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding an orange oil, which
was purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate). Indole 21 was obtained as a
◦
◦
1
crystalline solid (0.14 g, 0.37 mmol, 62%): mp 149–151 C (lit. [20] mp 151–152 C); H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
3
8.00 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.56 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.44 (q, 5H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.39 (s,
1
H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 2H), 4.31 (t, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.05 (s, 2H), 3.95 (t, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz).
2
.15. 4-(Phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]índole hydrogen chloride (22)
A clear, colorless solution of -chloroethyl chloroformate (0.07 mL, 0.6 mmol) in anhydrous
methylene chloride (10 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel to a pale orange solution of
α
2
-benzyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (21) (0.2 g, 0.5 mmol) in anhydrous
◦
methylene chloride (10 mL) with stirring at
−
10 C. The peach-colored solution was stirred for 1 h.
The solvent was removed via vacuum pump. Methanol (10 mL) was added to the peach-colored, solid
residue. The white suspension was refluxed for 1.75 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to
room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding 22 as a gray-white solid. The solid
was recrystallized with a mixture of hexanes:methylene chloride (1:1). A white solid was obtained
◦
1
(
7
0.1 g, 0.4 mmol, 86%): mp 219–220 ; H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
7.98 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.91 (d, 2H, J =
.2 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.52 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.41–7.27 (m, 3H), 4.99 (s, 2H), 4.69 (s, 2H);
Anal. Calcd for C H ClN O S: C, 57.40; H, 4.52; Cl, 10.59; N, 8.37; S, 9.58. Found: C, 55.58; H, 4.50;
3
16
15
2
2
Cl, 10.58; N, 7.79; S, 8.96.
0
0
0
2
.16. 2 -Methylene-1 ,9-bis(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,4,9-tetrahydrospiro[carbazole-3,3 -indoline; (Dimer 24)
4
-(Phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b] ndole hydrogen chloride (22) (0.371 g, 1.11
í
mmol) and Angeli’s salt (0.112 g, 1.13 mmol) were stirred in a 1:1 mixture of methanol (15 mL)
and distilled water (15 mL). Hydrochloric acid (0.6 M, 1.85 mL, 1.11 mmol) was added via syringe.
The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 27 min, after which it was refluxed for
◦
2
h
.
It was allowed to cool to room temperature and was subsequently was cooled to
−
78 C. It was
allowed to gradually warm up to room temperature. The organic layer was extracted with methylene
chloride (3 25 mL), washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (2 25 mL), and dried with
anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding a red-brown oil, which
was purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate). Dimer 24 was obtained as a
×
×
◦
1
tan solid (0.0731 g, 0.129 mmol, 23%): mp 134.5–135 C; H-NMR (CD Cl ) δ 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz),
2
2
7
8
.91 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.63–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.37 (t, 3H, J =
.4 Hz), 7.31 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.24 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.83–4.78 (m, 2H), 4.27 (s, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.04
13
(
s, 2H), 3.92 (s, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz); C-NMR (CDCl3)
δ 134.7 (2C), 134.6 (2C), 129.9 (4C), 127.0 (4C), 125.5
(2C), 125.4 (2C), 124.5 (2C), 123.9 (2C), 119.9 (2C), 119.7 (2C), 114.6 (2C), 114.5 (2C), 52.3, 51.0, 49.2, 47.6;
MS m/z 566 (M), 532, 457, 387, 315, 284, 245, 220, 173, 142, 91 (100%); HRMS Calcd for C H N O S :
32
26
2
4 2
5
66.1334; Found: 566.1328.

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
9 of 11
2
.17. 5-Phenylsulfonyl-5H-benzo[b]carbazole-7,10-dione (25)
,3-Dibromomethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (20) (0.50 g, 1.1 mmol), sodium iodide (1.2 g, 8.0
mmol), and p-benzoquinone (0.26 g, 2.4 mmol) were stirred in DMF (10.0 mL). The dark red-brown
2
◦
◦
reaction mixture was heated to 78 C and later cooled to 73.5 C. It was heated for 18 h and was
subsequently allowed to cool to room temperature. The dark-brown mixture was filtered through a
Celite pad with methylene chloride. The filtrate was poured onto aqueous sodium bisulfite. The organic
layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3
first with sodium sulfate, then with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in
×
20 mL), washed with brine (2
×
20 mL), and dried
vacuo giving a brown oil, which was purified via column chromatography. Quinone 25 was obtained
◦
1
as a bright yellow solid (0.11 g, 0.28 mmol, 25%): mp 214 C dec.; H-NMR (CDCl )
δ
9.00 (s, 1H), 8.66
3
(
7
s, 1H), 8.40 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.08 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.93 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.67 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz),
.55–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.40 (t, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.05 (q, 2H, JAB = 10.2 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3)
δ 184.9, 184.7,
1
39.5, 139.1, 134.7 (2C), 130.0 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 128.3, 126.9 (2C), 125.2, 125.1 (2C), 121.7 (2C), 119.4, 115.3,
1
13.4 (2C); UV λmax (95% EtOH) 195, 216, 284 nm; MS m/z 387 (M), 246 (100%), 218, 190, 164, 141, 115,
7
7; HRMS Calcd for C H NO S: 387.0565; Found: 387.0556.
22 13 4
2
.18. Angeli’s Salt (Sodium Trioxodinitrate)
The procedure of Addison was used [40]. A 21% solution of sodium ethoxide (17.7 mL, 47.4 mmol)
◦
in ethanol was added dropwise at 0 C to a saturated solution of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.10 g,
1
5.8 mmol) in ethanol (30mL). A light-orange suspension formed. After 80 min the resulting precipitate
was filtered off via gravity filtration. n-Butyl nitrate (2.32 mL, 15.8 mmol) was added via syringe
at room temperature to the yellow filtrate. The filtrate was cooled in an ice bath. A cream-colored
solid (0.764 g, 7.71 mmol, 49%) was collected via vacuum filtration and immediately used for the
deamination reaction step.
Author Contributions: A.R. and G.W.G. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to
the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by Dartmouth College.
Acknowledgments: This work is offered in memory of Pierre D. Lord.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1
.
Cava, M.P.; Napier, D.R. Condensed cyclobutane aromatic systems. II. Dihalo derivatives of benzocyclobutene
and benzocyclobutadiene dimer. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1701–1705. [CrossRef]
2
3
.
.
Charlton, J.L.; Alauddin, M.M. Orthoquinodimethanes. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 2873–2889. [CrossRef]
Segura, J.L.; Martin, N. o-Quinodimethanes: Efficient intermediates in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 1999
9, 3199–3246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
,
9
4
.
Yang, B.; Gao, S. Recent advances in the application of Diels–Alder reactions involving o-quinodimethanes,
aza-o-quinone methides and o-quinone methides in natural product total synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47,
7
926–7953. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
6.
7.
8.
Matsuya, Y. Recent application of ortho-quinodimethane chemistry for synthesis of heterocyclic compounds.
Heterocycles 2019, 98, 621–635. [CrossRef]
Marinelli, E.R. Generation and cycloaddition reactions of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982
,
2
3, 2745–2748. [CrossRef]
Magnus, P.; Gallagher, T.; Brown, P.; Pappalardo, P. The indole-2,3-quinodimethane strategy for the synthesis
of indole alkaloids. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 35–41. [CrossRef]
Vice, S.F.; de Carvalho, H.N.; Taylor, N.G.; Dmitrienko, G.I. Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes: generation,
reactivity and regioselective control of intermolecular Diels-Alder reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
7
289–7292. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
10 of 11
9
1
1
1
.
Pindur, U.; Erfanian-Abdoust, H. Indolo-2,3-quinodimethanes and stable cyclic analogues for regio- and
stereocontrolled syntheses of [b]-anelated indoles. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1681–1689. [CrossRef]
0. Fray, E.B.; Moody, C.J.; Shah, P. 1,4-Dihydropyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-ones as precursors to
indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 439–450. [CrossRef]
1. Laronze, M.; Sapi, J. 3-Cyanomethyl-2-vinylindoles as thermal indole-2,3-quinodimethane equivalents:
synthesis of functionalized 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7925–7928. [CrossRef]
2. Terzidis, M.; Tsoleridis, C.A.; Stephanidou-Stephanatou, J. Chromone-3-carboxaldehydes in Diels–Alder
reactions with indole-o-quinodimethane. Synthesis of tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-b]carbazoles. Tetrahedron Lett.
2
005, 46, 7239–7242. [CrossRef]
1
3. Kuroda, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Yoshinaga, K.; Mukai, C. A novel generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 1843–1845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1
4. Tsoleridis, C.A.; Dimtsas, J.; Hatzimimikou, D.; Stephanidou-Stephanatou, J. Reactivity and regioselectivity
in the synthesis of spiroindoles via indole o-quinodimethanes. An experimental and computational study.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4232–4242. [CrossRef]
1
5. Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. A new method for the generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes and
2-(N-alkoxycarbonylamino)-1,3-dienes. Intramolecular Heck/Diels–Alder cycloaddition cascade starting
from acyclic α-phosphono enecarbamates. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2876–2878. [CrossRef]
6. Fuwa, H.; Tako, T.; Ebine, M.; Sasaki, M. A new method for the generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes
from allenamides. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 904–905. [CrossRef]
7. Pelkey, E.T.; Gribble, G.W. One-step syntheses of the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole and pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole ring
systems from 3-nitroindoles. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1873–1874. [CrossRef]
8. Gribble, G.W.; Pelkey, E.T.; Switzer, F.L. New syntheses of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles, benzo[b]furo[2,3-c]pyrroles,
and benzo[b]thieno[2,3-c]pyrroles. Utilizing the reaction of münchnones (1,3-oxazolium-5-olates) with
nitroheterocycles. Synlett 1998, 1061–1062. [CrossRef]
1
1
1
1
9. Gribble, G.W.; Pelkey, E.T.; Simon, W.M.; Trujillo, H.A. Regioselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions
of unsymmetrical münchnones (1,3-oxazolium-5-olates) with 2- and 3-nitroindoles. A new synthesis of
pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 10133–10140. [CrossRef]
2
0. Kishbaugh, T.L.S.; Gribble, G.W. Synthesis of N-substituted pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles from 2,3-dimethylindole.
Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2003–2008. [CrossRef]
2
1. Roy, S.; Kishbaugh, T.L.S.; Jasinski, J.P.; Gribble, G.W. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of 2- and 3-nitroindoles
with azomethine ylides. A new approach to pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1313–1316.
[
CrossRef]
2. Badenock, J.C.; Fraser, H.L.; Gribble, G.W. A new approach to the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole ring system. Arkivoc
018, 140–149. [CrossRef]
2
2
2
2
3. Lemal, D.M.; Rave, T.W. Diazenes from Angeli’s salt. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 393–394. [CrossRef]
4. Lemal, D.M.; McGregor, S.D. Dienes from 3-pyrrolines. A stereospecific deamination. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
965, 88, 1335–1336. [CrossRef]
2
5. Larock, R.C.; Yum, E.K. Synthesis of indoles via palladium-catalyzed heteroannulation of internal alkynes. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6689–6690. [CrossRef]
2
2
6. Illi, V.O. Phase transfer-catalyzed N-sulfonation of indole. Synthesis 1979, 10, 136. [CrossRef]
7. Ketcha, D.M.; Gribble, G.W. A convenient synthesis of 3-acylindoles via Friedel-Crafts acylation of
1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. A new route to pyridocarbazole-5,11-quinones and ellipticine. Org. Chem.
1
985, 50, 5451–5457. [CrossRef]
2
8. Dolby, L.J.; Gribble, G.W. New reactions of 3-vinylindoles. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 6377–6386. [CrossRef]
2
9. Yang, B.V.; O’Rourke, D.; Li, J. Mild and selective debenzylation of tertiary amines using α-chloroethyl
chloroformate. Synlett 1993, 195–196. [CrossRef]
3
0. Bassoli, A.; Borgonovo, G.; Busnelli, G.; Morini, G.; Merlini, L. Monatin, its stereoisomers and derivatives:
modeling the sweet taste chemoreception mechanism. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2518–2525. [CrossRef]
1. Erfanian-Abdoust, H.; Pindur, U. New reactivity of stable indole-2,3-quinodimethane equivalents:
3
[4 + 2]-cycloaddition, cycloreversion, sigmatropic rearrangement, and elimination processes in the
reactions of 1,4-dimethylpyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-one and 1-methylpyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-one with CC-dienophiles.
Heterocycles 1989, 29, 1709–1719.

Molecules 2020, 25, 261
11 of 11
3
3
3
3
3
2. Bergman, J.; Carlsson, R. Synthesis of the indole alkaloid ellipticine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 4663–4666.
[CrossRef]
3. Kano, S.; Sugino, E.; Shibuya, S.; Hibino, S. A new synthesis of the antitumor 6H-pyrido[4,3-b]carbazole
alkaloid ellipticine. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2979–2981. [CrossRef]
4. Mohanakrishnan, A.K.; Srinivasan, P.C. Unusual oxidation of 2 (or 3)-methylindole derivatives with active
manganese dioxide. Synth. Comm. 2007, 25, 2407–2414. [CrossRef]
5. Mohanakrishnan, A.K.; Srinivasan, P.C. Synthesis of 3-aryl-5h-pyrido[4,3-b]indoles. Synth. Comm. 2007, 25,
2
415–2424. [CrossRef]
6. Cava, M.P.; Deana, A.A.; Muth, K. Condensed cyclobutane aromatic compounds. VIII. The mechanism
of formation of 1,2-dibromobenzocyclobutene; a new Diels–Alder synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81,
6
458–6460. [CrossRef]
7. Sundberg, R.J.; Russell, H.F. Syntheses with N-protected 2-lithioindoles. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3324–3330.
CrossRef]
8. Gribble, G.W.; Keavy, D.J.; Davis, D.A.; Saulnier, M.G.; Pelcman, B.; Barden, T.C.; Sibi, M.P.; Olson, E.R.;
BelBruno, J.J. Syntheses and Diels–Alder cycloaddition reactions of 4H-furo[3,4-b]indoles. A regiospecific
Diels–Alder synthesis of ellipticine. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5878–5891. [CrossRef]
3
3
[
3
9. Sha, C.-K.; Yang, J.-F. Total syntheses of ellipticine alkaloids and their amino analogues. Tetrahedron 1992, 48,
1
0645–10654. [CrossRef]
0. Addison, C.C.; Gamlen, G.A.; Thompson, R. The Ultra-violet absorption spectra of sodium hyponitrite and
sodium -oxyhyponitrite: The analysis of mixtures with sodium nitrite and nitrate. J. Chem. Soc. 1952
38–345. [CrossRef]
4
α
,
3
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are unfortunately not available from the authors.
©
2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
(