M. Tajbakhsh et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 177 (2013) 44–48
45
Brønsted acidic AILs have been incorporated within the organic synthe-
sis section, since that is the principal application of that compounds
37].
However, some of reported methods in the synthesis of polyhydro-
quinoline derivatives have one or more disadvantages such as moisture
sensitive, or highly toxic in environment and unpleasant experimental
procedure and reagents which are expensive. A mild and efficient cata-
lyst for the synthesis of polyhydroquinoline is very desirable. Performing
organic reactions in aqueous media has attracted much attention
because of wonderful water properties. It would be significantly safe,
cheap, non-toxic and environmentally friendly compared to organic
solvents [38].
Multi-component reactions (MCRs) have emerged as an efficient and
powerful tool in modern synthetic organic chemistry allowing the facile
creation of several new bonds in a one-pot reaction [39]. We would like
to report a highly efficient and green four-component Hantzsch conden-
sation in the presence of 2-methylpyridinium trifluoromethanesulfonate
Table 1
Hantzsch condensation synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivatives in the presence of
2-MPyH]OTf as a catalyst.
[
[
Entry
Aldehyde
M.p (°C)
Time
Yield (%)
[Ref.]
(min)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Benzaldehyde
203–205
207–209
233–235
241–243
201–203
184–186
216–218
228–230
201–203
257–259
202–204
212–214
193–195
262–264
246–248
182–184
233–235
188–190
204–206
172–174
242–244
143–145
203–205
245–247
223–225
142–144
147–149
161–163
8
6
5
5
7
5
8
6
7
6
6
7
6
7
6
7
4
2
2
3
1
2
95 [41]
96 [15]
97 [42]
97 [23]
96 [43]
97 [13]
94 [16]
95 [41]
96 [15]
96 [41]
96 [44]
96 [45]
97 [10]
96 [41]
96 [46]
96 [46]
97 [14]
98 [17]
97 [10]
97 [10]
98 [10]
98 [17]
93 [18]
95 [44]
95 [15]
92 [41]
92 [41]
94 [41]
2-Chlorobenzaldehyde
4-Chlorobenzaldehyde
2,4-Dichlorobenzaldehyde
3,4-Dichlorobenzaldehyde
4-Fluorobenzaldehyde
3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde
3-Methoxybenzaldehyde
4-Methoxybenzaldehyde
3,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde
4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde
3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzaldehyde
4-Methylbenzaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
4-Isopropylbenzaldehyde
4-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde
4-Trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde
2-Nitrobenzaldehyde
1
1
12
0
1
1
1
1
1
17
18
1
2
2
2
2
3
4
5
6
([2-MPyH]OTf) [40] as an ionic liquid catalyst in water using various
aromatic and aliphatic aldehyde, dimedone, ethyl acetoacetate and am-
monium acetate to produce the polyhydroquinoline derivatives in good
to excellent yields.
9
0
1
2
3
3-Nitrobenzaldehyde
4-Nitrobenzaldehyde
2
. Experimental
4-Cyanobenzaldehyde
Cinnamaldehyde
Furan-2-carbaldehyde
Thiophene-2-carbaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
10
8
10
15
15
12
2
.1. General procedure for the synthesis of [2-MPyH]OTf as an ionic liquid
24
25
26
27
catalyst
Butyraldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
The ionic liquid [2-MPyH]OTf as a catalyst was synthesized according
28
to literature [40]. A white solid was formed in high purity and then the
physical data (IR, NMR) of this known ionic liquid were found to be
identical. Spectral data: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
): δ 2.93 (s, 3H),
.26–7.67 (m, 2H), 8.29–8.36 (m, 1H), 8.84 (d, J=5.9 Hz, 1H), 17.21
―CH
2.27 (s, 3H, ―CH
(q, 2H, J=7.2 Hz, ―OCH
3H, Ar―H), 8.19 (brs, 1H, ―NH); C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
13.9, 26.5, 27.2, 28.3, 33.4, 38.6, 47.5, 52.1, 58.1, 105.3, 107.3, 111.3,
14.9, 121.1, 135.3, 147.4, 147.9, 153.2, 155.1, 167.7, 195.1; IR (KBr,
cm ) 3396, 3280, 3067, 2959, 1687, 1550, 1475, 1263, 1223, 850.
Ethyl 2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-4-p-tolyl-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquino-
line-3-carboxylate (Table 1—entry 14): Yield: 96%; M.p 262–264 °C
), 1.92–2.15 (dd, 2H, ―CH
), 3.57 (s, 3H, ―OCH
―), 4.71 (s, 1H, ―CH―), 6.45–6.73 (m,
―), 2.21–2.35 (dd, 2H, ―CH
3
3
2
2
―),
7
3
3
), 3.73 (s, 3H, ―OCH ), 4.03
3
1
3
(
brs, 1H); C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 154.3, 146.8, 141.5, 128.1,
2
−
1
13
1
8
25.2, 120.9, 20.3; IR (KBr, cm ) 2983, 1631, 1365, 1223, 1070, 957,
87, 579.
3
): δ
1
−
1
2
.2. General procedure for the synthesis of polyhydroquinoline
derivatives
A mixture of aldehyde (1 mmol), dimedone (1 mmol), ethyl aceto-
acetate (1 mmol) and ammonium acetate (1 mmol) was added to
2-MPyH]OTf catalyst (1 mol%) in water (2 mL), and the reaction mixture
(Ref. [41] 260–261 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 0.81 (s, 3H,
), 1.17 (t, 3H, J=7.2 Hz, ―CH ), 1.98 (s, 3H,
), 2.03 (dd, 2H, ―CH ―), 2.21 (dd, 2H, ―CH ―), 2.41 (s, 3H,
), 4.06 (q, 2H, J=7.1 Hz, ―OCH ―), 5.15 (s, 1H, ―CH―), 7.43
(d, 2H, J=9.2 Hz, Ar―H), 8.13 (d, 2H, J=9.2 Hz, Ar―H), 8.22 (brs,
1H, ―NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
): δ 14.3, 18.5, 23.1, 27.1, 27.8,
33.9, 37.6, 40.7, 51.3, 61.9, 77.5, 104.4, 111.9, 121.2, 127.1, 146.5,
―CH
―CH
―CH
3
), 1.07 (s, 3H, ―CH
3
3
[
3
2
2
was stirred at room temperature for an appropriate time. Completion of
the reactions was monitored by TLC (n-hexan/ethyl acetate 4:1). After
completion of the reaction, the resulting solid crude product was filtered
and then recrystallized from ethanol–water to obtain pure product. The
formation of products was related by comparing the melting points, IR
and NMR data with authentic samples and literature data.
3
2
3
−
1
150.3, 154.3, 167.2, 193.5; IR (KBr, cm ) 3270, 3180, 3075, 2967,
1661, 1615, 1557, 1480, 1359, 1270, 1150, 875.
Ethyl 2,7,7-trimethyl-4-(4-trifluorophenyl)-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexa-
hydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Table 1—entry 18): Yield: 98%; M.p
2
.3. Spectral data for the synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivatives
1
88–190 °C (Ref. [17] 188–190 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ
3
), 1.27 (t, 3H, J=7.5 Hz,
Ethyl 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahy-
0.93 (s, 3H, ―CH
―CH ), 2.11 (dd, 2H, ―CH
―CH ), 4.12 (q, 2H, J=7.3 Hz, ―OCH
3
), 1.12 (s, 3H, ―CH
droquinoline-3-carboxylate (Table 1—ntry 3): Yield: 97%; M.p 233–
3
2
2
―), 2.17 (dd, 2H, ―CH ―), 2.39 (s, 3H,
2
3
35 °C (Ref. [43] 230–232 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
H, ―CH ), 0.93 (s, 3H, ―CH ), 1.11 (t, 3H, J=7.3 Hz, ―CH
―), 2.12 (dd, 2H, ―CH ―), 2.26 (s, 3H, ―CH ), 3.95 (q,
H, J=7.2 Hz, ―OCH ―), 4.93 (s, 1H, ―CH―), 7.07 (d, 2H, J=9.1 Hz,
Ar―H), 7.15 (d, 2H, J=9.2 Hz, Ar―H), 7.91 (brs, 1H, ―NH); C NMR
100 MHz, CDCl ): δ 14.7, 18.8, 26.7, 29.3, 31.7, 35.3, 41.1, 50.4, 59.8,
5.9, 103.1, 110.8, 127.1, 128.6, 130.7, 144.3, 150.2, 164.9, 193.9; IR
3
): δ 0.81 (s,
), 2.04
3
2
―), 5.19 (s, 1H, ―CH―),
3
3
3
7.47 (d, 2H, J=9.3 Hz, Ar―H), 8.01 (d, 2H, J=9.4 Hz, Ar―H), 8.26
(
dd, 2H, ―CH
2
2
3
(brs, 1H, ―NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 14.9, 19.3, 27.6,
2
2
29.7, 32.9, 37.6, 54.7, 63.1, 105.4, 114.3, 123.9, 127.1, 129.6, 147.2,
13
−1
152.3, 155.2, 168.1, 196.1; IR (KBr, cm ) 3287, 3157, 3065, 2978,
(
7
3
1670, 1610, 1557, 1480, 1345, 1270, 1201, 875.
Ethyl 2,7,7-trimethyl-4-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahy-
droquinoline-3-carboxylate (Table 1—entry 21): Yield: 98%; M.p
−
1
(
KBr, cm ) 3270, 3195, 3070, 2945, 1670, 1604, 1475, 1367, 1227,
1
105, 857.
242–244 °C (Ref. [10] 242–244 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ
3
), 1.15 (t, 3H, J=7.3 Hz,
Ethyl 4-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-
0.86 (s, 3H, ―CH
―CH ), 2.09 (dd, 2H, ―CH
―CH ), 4.08 (q, 2H, J=7.4 Hz, ―OCH
3
), 1.06 (s, 3H, ―CH
hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Table 1—entry 11): Yield: 96%;
M.p 202–204 °C (Ref. [44] 198–199 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
):
δ 0.93 (s, 3H, – CH ), 1.04 (s, 3H, ―CH ), 1.25 (t, 3H, J=7.3 Hz,
3
2
―), 2.18 (dd, 2H, ―CH
2
―), 2.37 (s, 3H,
―), 5.13 (s, 1H, ―CH―),
3
3
2
3
3
7.49 (d, 2H, J=9.4 Hz, Ar―H), 8.11 (d, 2H, J=9.4 Hz, Ar―H), 8.17