and (3) conversion of thiocarbonyl compounds into their
carbonyl analogues8 (Scheme 1) and a sequential desulfuriza-
herein we report a highly selective ratiometric fluorescent
probe for Hg2+ in water at neutral pH based on the 1,8-
naphthalimide fluorophore tethered via an alkyne moiety.
Switch of selectivity to Au3+ was also observed after the
tuning of pH, which constituted the first ratiometric case.
As shown in Scheme 2, the probe 1 was easily prepared from
Scheme 1.
Reaction-Based Tactics for the Sensing of Hg2+
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Probe 1
tion-lactonization reaction.9 This thiophilic approach cannot
avoid potential interference in sulfur-rich environments where
mercury is abundant,10 and undesired oxidation of the probes
containing a sulfur atom by air or oxidizing reagents always
takes place. Other drawbacks may be utilization of elevated
temperature or excess quantities of Hg2+ to drive these
desulfurization reactions to completion. Thus, investigation
of a nonsulfur strategy11 except a direct mercuration reac-
tion12 is highly desirable. Although hydration of alkynes
catalyzed by Hg2+ (Kucherov reaction)13 has been known
for a century, curiously, the great potential of this classic
reaction has not been recognized until recently, and only two
examples that are limited in the coumarin and fluorescein
fluorophores, both of which are not ratiometric, can be found
to date.14 Extension of this methodology to other fluoro-
phores for the development of more effective (especially
ratiometric) sensors is still in high demand.
5-nitroacenaphthene by modifying the reported procedure16
(see Supporting Information).
Next, Hg2+, Ag+, Au3+, Au+, Al3+, Ba2+, Ca2+, Cd2+,
Co2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, K+, Li+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Na+, Ni2+,
Pb2+, Sr2+, and Zn2+ ions were used to measure the
selectivity of probe 1 (5 µM) in HEPES buffer (0.01 M, pH
) 7.4) (0.05% DMSO, v/v), and fluorescence spectra were
recorded after 5 min upon the addition of 2.0 equiv of each
of these metal ions. Compared to other metal ions examined,
only Hg2+ caused the change of the maximum fluorescence
emission band of probe 1 from 543 to 486 nm (Figure 1a).
To validate the selectivity of 1 in practice, the competition
experiments were also measured by addition of 0.12 equiv
of Hg2+ to the aqueous solutions in the presence of 1.0 equiv
of other metal ions as shown in Figure 1b. All competitive
metal ions had no obvious interference with the detection
of the Hg2+ ion, which indicated that the system of 1-Hg2+
was hardly affected by these coexistent ions. These results
suggested that probe 1 displayed an excellent selectivity
toward Hg2+ in water at neutral pH.
In connection with our continuing research of sensors for
biologically and environmentally important metal ions,15
(6) (a) Yang, Y.-K.; Yook, K.-J.; Tae, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
16760–16761. (b) Yang, Y.-K.; Ko, S.-K.; Shin, I.; Tae, J. Nat. Protoc.
2007, 2, 1740–1745. (c) Shi, W.; Ma, H. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1856–
1858. (d) Lin, W.; Cao, X.; Ding, Y.; Yuan, L.; Long, L. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 3529–3531.
The fluorescence titration of Hg2+ was conducted using a
5 µM solution of 1 in HEPES buffer (0.01 M, pH ) 7.4)
(0.05% DMSO, v/v). Upon the addition of Hg2+ to the
solution, a significant decrease of the fluorescence intensity
at 543 nm and an increase of fluorescence emission band
centered at 486 nm were observed with an isoemission point
at 509 nm, which indicated a clear ratiometric fluorescence
change (Figure 1c).17 The ratio of fluorescence intensity at
(7) (a) Wu, J.-S.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, K. S.; Kim, J. S. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 907–910. (b) Lee, M. H.; Lee, S. W.; Kim, S. H.; Kang, C.; Kim, J. S.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2101–2104.
(8) (a) Song, K. C.; Kim, J. S.; Park, S. M.; Chung, K.-C.; Ahn, S.;
Chang, S.-K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3413–3416. (b) Choi, M. G.; Kim, Y. H.;
Namgoong, J. E.; Chang, S.-K. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3560–3562. (c)
Namgoong, J. E.; Jeon, H. L.; Kim, Y. H.; Choi, M. G.; Chang, S.-K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 167–169.
(9) Jiang, W.; Wang, W. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3913–3915.
(10) Winch, S.; Praharaj, T.; Fortin, D.; Lean, D. R. S. Sci. Total
EnViron. 2008, 392, 242–251.
(11) (a) Santra, M.; Ryu, D.; Chatterjee, A.; Ko, S.-K.; Shin, I.; Ahn,
K. H. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2115–2117. (b) Cho, Y.-S.; Ahn, K. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3852–3854. (c) Du, J.; Fan, J.; Peng, X.; Sun,
P.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Sun, S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 476–479.
(12) Choi, M. G.; Ryu, D. H.; Jeon, H. L.; Cha, S.; Cho, J.; Joo, H. H.;
Hong, K. S.; Lee, C.; Ahn, S.; Chang, S.-K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3717–
3720.
(15) (a) Ma, T.-H.; Dong, M.; Dong, Y.-M.; Wang, Y.-W.; Peng, Y.
Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 10313–10318. (b) Dong, M.; Ma, T.-H.; Zhang,
A.-J.; Dong, Y.-M.; Wang, Y.-W.; Peng, Y. Dyes Pigm. 2010, 87, 164–
172. (c) Ma, T.-H.; Zhang, A.-J.; Dong, M.; Dong, Y.-M.; Peng, Y.; Wang,
Y.-W. J. Lumin. 2010, 130, 888–892.
(16) (a) Mader, H.; Li, X.; Saleh, S.; Link, M.; Kele, P.; Wolfbeis, O. S.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1130, 218–223. (b) Kele, P.; Li, X.; Link, M.;
Nagy, K.; Herner, A.; L’orincz, K.; Be´ni, S.; Wolfbeis, O. S. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2009, 7, 3486–3490.
(13) (a) Kucherov, M. G. Chem. Ber. 1909, 42, 2759–2762. For a recent
review, see (b) Hintermann, L.; Labonne, A. Synthesis 2007, 1121–1150.
(14) (a) Lee, D.-N.; Kim, G.-J.; Kim, H.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50,
4766–4768. (b) Koide developed a chemodosimeter based on tandem
hydration of the alkyne and ꢀ-elimination; however, indispensable high
temperature (90 °C) could not be compatible in the thermosensitive systems.
See: Song, F.; Watanabe, S.; Floreancig, P. E.; Koide, K. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 16460-16461.
(17) To date, all known ratiometric chemodosimeters utilized “S”
approach and work in mixed organic/aqueous media. See: (a) Liu, B.; Tian,
H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3156–3158. (b) Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8025–8029. (c) Shang, G.-Q.; Gao, X.;
Chen, M.-X.; Zheng, H.; Xu, J.-G. J. Fluoresc. 2008, 18, 1187–1192. (d)
Li, H.; Yan, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 7526–7530.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010
5311