7570
latter effects minimal cleavage. The corresponding borane adduct, [BH3(NMe3)], is completely
inactive towards the substrate. These differences can again be explained by the intermediate
electronegativity of indium relative to aluminium and gallium which gives rise to an intermediate
MꢀH bond polarity and therefore reactivity. This contrast is compounded by the regiochemistry
of the reduction of styrene oxide (XI) with 1. The proportion of 2-phenylethanol formed in this
reduction (44%) suggests the participation of an alkoxyindium transition state that possesses a
benzylic carbocation prior to hydride transfer. This is similar to the behaviour of quinuclidine–
alane (37% primary alcohol).2 However, in keeping with the electropositive nature of MH3
adducts, the secondary alcohol is also formed in roughly equivalent yield (56%). Tricyclo-
hexylphosphine gallane reduces styrene oxide to the secondary alcohol with >99% selectivity,
which again places the indane complex, 1, in between alane and gallane complexes in terms of
its regioselectivity2.
In summary, we have proven the utility of indium trihydride complexes as selective reducing
agents. Overall, they appear to behave in an intermediate fashion to their aluminium and
gallium trihydride analogues, which was predicted based on the physical properties of the metal
involved. We believe our success in synthesising air and room temperature stable Lewis-base
adducts of indane will lead to such complexes being added to the organic chemist’s arsenal of
selective reducing agents. The study described here is currently being extended, placing emphasis
on the isolation of intermediates, as we believe the nature of these will shed light on the
mechanisms involved. The results of these investigations will be reported in subsequent
publications.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Mr. Robert Jenkins for GCMS analyses and the Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council for financial support (C. D. A. and M. L. C.).
References
1. Examples: (a) Brown, C. B.; Yoon, N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1464. (b) Marlett, E. M.; Park, W. S. J.
Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2968.
2. Raston, C. L.; Siu, A. F. H.; Tranter, C. J.; Young, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5915.
3. (a) Yamada, M.; Tanaka, K.; Araki, S.; Butsugan, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3169. (b) Yamada, M.; Horie,
T.; Kawai, M.; Yamamura, H.; Araki, S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15685. (c) Miyai, M.; Inoue, K.; Shibata, I.; Baba,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1929.
4. (a) Francis, M. D.; Hibbs, D. E.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Jones, C.; Smithies, N. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998,
3249. (b) Cole, M. L.; Hibbs, D. E.; Jones, C.; Smithies, N. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 4, 545.
5. (a) Hibbs, D. E.; Jones, C.; Smithies, N. A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 185. (b) Abernethy, C. D.; Cole, M. L.; Davies,
A. J.; Jones, C. Organometallics, submitted.
6. Greeves, N. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Fleming, I.; Trost, B. M., Eds. Reduction of CꢁX Bonds.
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; 14 and Refs. 2 and 3.
7. Examples: (a) Mertinez, E.; Muchowski, J. M.; Velarde, E. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 46, 1087. (b) Martin, S. F.;
Williamson, S. A.; Gist, R. P.; Smith, K. M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 5170.
8. Cieplak, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4540.
.