S. Muhammad, F.I. Ali, M.N. Javed et al.
Journal of Molecular Liquids xxx (xxxx) xxx
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm: 9.31 (s, H-2, 1H), 7.82 (s, H-4
and H-5, 2H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-2’ 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz,
H-4’ 1H), 6.59 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-3′, 1H), 6.57 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-
5′, 1H), 3.83 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, N-CH2, 4H), 1.79 (s, CH2- CH2N, 4H), 1.25
(broad singlet, CH2 x 3, 6H), 0.85 (s, terminal CH3 of alkyl chains at-
tached to imidazolium moiety, 6H).
chain), 30.9(CH2, C-2 of alkyl chain), 29.7 (CH2, C-3 of alkyl chain),
25.5 (CH2, C-4 of alkyl chain), 22.3 (CH2, C-5 of alkyl chain), 14.2 (termi-
nal CH3, C-6 of alkyl chain).
HR-ESI-MS + ve: m/z 237.2224 (C+, calcd. for C15H29N+2 m/z 237.
2325), HR-ESI-MS –ve: m/z 136.0374 (A− calcd. For C7H6NO2− m/z
136.0398); m/z 509.3118 [CA−2 , C29H41N4O4]−.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ ppm: 171.7 (-COO−), 163.5 (C-OH
aromatic), 136.5 (N-C=N imidazole ring), 131.7 (Anion C\\H, C-4′),
130.3 (Anion C\\H, 6′), 122.9 (C-1′), 120.9 (Imidazole C-4 and C-5),
116.2 and 116.1 (Anion C\\H, C-3′ and 5′), 49.3 (N-CH2, C-1 of alkyl
chain), 30.9 (CH2, C-2 of alkyl chain), 29.7 (CH2, C-3 of alkyl chain),
25.5 (CH2, C-4 of alkyl chain), 22.3 (CH2, C-5 of alkyl chain), 14.2 (Termi-
nal CH3, C-6 of alkyl chain).
2.6. Synthesis of 1,3-dihexylimidazolium 4-aminobenzoate (RTIL-4)
Sodium salt of p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) was prepared, followed
by ion exchange with [hhim]+ [Br]− following the method described in
Section 2.3. A hydrophobic waxy dark brown product was obtained.
Yield: 90%.
HR-ESI-MS + ve: m/z 237.2224 (C+, calcd. for C15H29N+2 m/z
237.2325), m/z 321.3290 (C++Hexyl; C21H49N2+); m/z 153.1406
(C+ − Hexyl; C9H17N+2 ); HR-ESI-MS –ve: m/z 137.0167 (calcd. For
C7H5O−3 m/z 137.0238); m/z 93.0312 (C5HO2−, A− - CO2); m/z
511.2794 ([CA2]−, C29H39N2O−6 ), m/z 885.5353 ([C2A3]−, C51H73N4O−9 ).
IR νmax KBr cm−1: 3431.6, 3420.2 (Aromatic NH2), 3132.2, 3066.2
(aromatic C\\H stretching), 2957.5, 2930.6, 2858.3 (aliphatic C\\H
stretching due to octyl chain hydrogen), 1604.2 (Conjugated C_O),
1562.4 (C_N imidazole ring), 1463.1 (C_C imidazole ring), 1376.8
(C\\O), 1301.4 (C\\N), 1163.2 (C\\C).
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm:: 9.39 (s, N-CH-N, 1H), 7.64
(br. s, H-4 & H-5 imidazole ring, 2H), 7.19 (br. s, H-2′ & H-6′ anion,
4H), 6.91 (br. s, H-3′ & H-5′ anion, 4H), 4.17 (br. s, N-CH2, 4H), 1.69 (s,
CH2- CH2N, 4H), 11.26 (broad singlet, CH2 x 6, 12H), 0.85 (br. s, terminal
CH3, 6H).
2.4. Synthesis of 1,3-dihexylimidazolium 4-hydroxybenzoate (RTIL-2)
Sodium salt of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHB) was prepared, followed
by ion exchange with [hhim]+ [Br]− following the method described in
Section 2.3. A yellow-coloured waxy hydrophobic product was ob-
tained. Yield: 90%.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz; δ in ppm): 122.92 (imidazole C-4 &
C-5), 49.29 (CH2, C-1 of alkyl chain), 46.44 (CH2, C-1 of alkyl chain),
31.13 (CH2, C-2 of alkyl chain), 30.99 (CH2, C-2 of alkyl chain), 29.71
(CH2, C-3 of alkyl chain), 26.04 (CH2, C-4 of alkyl chain), 25.58 (CH2,
C-4 of alkyl chain), 22.44 (CH2, C-5 of alkyl chain), 22.34 (CH2, C-5 of
alkyl chain), 14.30 (terminal CH3, C-6 of alkyl chain), 14.25 (terminal
CH3, C-6 of alkyl chain). Note: N-C=N imidazole ring and carbon-
based of anion could not be observed due to the exceptionally low sam-
ple quantity. Furthermore, the respective 1H NMR was conducted with
the same sample tube and observed according to the expected molecu-
lar structure.
IR νmax KBr cm−1: 3379.82 (phenolic OH), 3149.5, 3093.3 (aromatic
C\\H stretching), 2958.2, 2930.4, 2859.3 (aliphatic C\\H stretching due
to octyl chain hydrogen), 1611.6 (conjugated C_O), 1544.8 (C_N im-
idazole ring), 1425.9 (C_C imidazole ring), 1380.7 (C\\O), 1165.2
(C\\C).
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm: 16.5 (H-bonding), 9.29 (s, N-
CH-N, 1H), 7.82 & 7.62 (each s, H-4 & H-5 imidazole ring, 2H), 7.12 (s, H-
2′ & H-6′, 2H), 6.60 (s, H-3′ & H-5′, 2H), 4.17 (s, N-CH2, 4H), 1.79 (br. s,
CH2- CH2N, 4H), 1.68, 1.26 (broad singlet, CH2 x 6, 12H), 0.85 (s, termi-
nal CH3, 6H).
HR-ESI-MS + ve: m/z 237.2224 (C+, calcd. for C15H29N+2 m/z
237.2325), m/z 321.3255 (C++Hexyl; C21H49N2+); m/z 153.1406
(C+ − Hexyl; C9H17N+2 ); HR-ESI-MS –ve: m/z 136.0384 (A−calcd. For
C7H6NO−2 m/z 136.0398); m/z 509.3131 [C29H41N4O4]−.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ ppm: 163.4 (C-OH aromatic), 136.5
(N-C=N imidazole ring), 131.6 (Anion C\\H, C-2′ & C-6′), 130.3 (Anion
C\\H, C-1′), 122.9 (imidazole C-4 & C-5), 116.2 (Anion C\\H, C-3′ & C-
5′), 49.3 (N-CH2, C-1 of alkyl chain), 31.1 (CH2, C-2 of alkyl chain),
29.6 (CH2, C-3 of alkyl chain), 25.5(CH2, C-4 of alkyl chain), 22.3 (CH2,
C-5 of alkyl chain), 14.2 (tCH3, C-6 of alkyl chain).
2.7. Electrical measurement of RTILs
HR-ESI-MS + ve: m/z 237.2224 (C+, calcd. for C15H29N+2 m/z
237.2325), m/z 321.3255 (C++Hexyl; C21H49N2+); m/z 153.1261
(C+ − Hexyl; C9H17N+2 ); HR-ESI-MS –ve: m/z 137.0174 (calcd. For
C7H5O−3 m/z 137.0238); m/z 275.0570 (C14H11O6−, A−2 + H).
Electrical conductivities of the RTILs 1–4 were recoded on a Hanna
(probe model HI763100) conductivity meter at ambient temperature.
Each sample was prepared in ethanol with varying molar concentra-
tions. GLP Standard: 0 μS/cm, 12.88 mS/cm; Offset: 0.00 μS/cm, C.F.
(cm−1): 1.063; T. Coef (%/°C): 1.90; T. Ref (°C): 2; The results are listed
in Table S1 (Supporting information).
2.5. Synthesis of 1,3-dihexylimidazolium 2-aminobenzoate (RTIL-3)
Sodium salt of o-aminobenzoic acid (OAB) was prepared, followed
by ion exchange with [hhim]+ [Br]− following the method described
in Section 2.3. A hydrophobic waxy brown product (3) was obtained.
Yield: 90%.
2.8. Rheological studies of RTILs
The studies were performed using a Brookfield DV-III rheometer.
The spindle selected for measurements was Spindle 0. The selection of
spindles was based on the % torque limits of 10–100%. The prepared
ionic liquid was used as is, without any dilution, for the rheology
study. The volume of sample used was 16 mL as required by the UL
Adapter spindle. The sample was set on hold for 5 min to equilibrate be-
fore each run. For each run, the % torque, viscosity, shear stress, and
strain rate were recorded at different speeds (rpm). The data obtained
were used in rheological modeling.
Rheologicak data could be evaluated using several models to obtain
insight into the flow properties of the substance under study. Rheolog-
ical models can be categorized as empirical (e.g., power law model),
structural (e.g., Casson model), and theoretical (e.g., Newtonian)
models. These models can be divided into two further types viz. time-
independent and time-dependent models. In this study rheological
data were processed using the Newtonian, Bingham, Power law, and
IR νmax KBr cm−1: 3432.2, 3375.7 (NH2), 3138.1, 3073.6, (aromatic
C\\H stretching), 2957.9, 2927.5, 2857.4 (aliphatic C\\H stretching due
to octyl chain hydrogen), 1689.4 (conjugated C_O), 1566.6 (C_N im-
idazole ring), 1494.2 (C_C imidazole ring), 1297.3 (C\\N), 1161.1
(C\\C).
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm: 9.49 (s, N-CH-N, 1H), 7.83 (s,
H-4 & H-5, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, H-2′, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.0,
1.5 Hz, H-4′, 1H), 6.49 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, H-3′, 1H), 6.34 (dd, J = 8.0,
1.5 Hz, H-5′, 1H), 4.18 (br. s, 4H), 1.78 (br. s, CH2- CH2N, 4H), 1.26
(broad singlet, CH2 x 4), 0.85 (br. s, 2 x terminal CH3, 6H).
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ ppm: 172.2 (-COO−), 150.5 (C\\N
anion), 136.7 (N-C=N imidazole ring), 132.1 (Anion C\\H, C-4′), 129.7
(anion C\\H, 6′), 122.9 (imidazole C-4 and C-5), 121.8 (anion C\\H C-
1′), 115.4 & 114.0 (Anion C\\H, C-3′ and 5′), 49.2 (N-CH2, C-1 of alkyl
3