in 81% overall yield. Lastly this was acetylated using acetic
anhydride and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and depro-
tected selectively using buffered tetra(n-butyl)ammonium fluo-
ride (TBAF) to give the known2 taurospongin fragment 11
(Scheme 1). The spectral and optical rotational data were
identical to the sample previously synthesised by Jacobsen et
al.2
For the synthesis of the other fatty acid side chain (Scheme
2), octadec-1-yne 12 was deprotonated with n-butyllithium and
coupled with 2-(3-bromopropoxy)tetrahydro-2H-pyran fol-
lowed by acidic work-up to give the alcohol 13. This compound
was selectively hydrogenated with the Lindlar catalyst and
oxidised with periodinane9 to the aldehyde 14, which was
homologated with the Ohira reagent 1510 to give the enyne 16 in
84% yield over three steps. This compound was extended
further by deprotonation with n-butyllithium and alkylation
with 2-(3-bromopropoxy)tetrahydro-2H-pyran to give a product
(82% yield) which, upon direct oxidation with Jones reagent,
gave the required acid 17 in 92% yield (46% overall yield from
the acetylene 12).
The final steps of the synthesis were achieved by a
modification of the literature route.2 Diol 11 was transformed to
the corresponding acid via oxidation with TEMPO, KBr,
NaHCO3 and NaOCl, and converted to the allyl ester 18 by
alkylation with allyl bromide in the presence of Hünigs’ base (i-
Pr2NEt). Removal of the tert-butyldimethylsilyl protecting
group from 18 using HF–pyridine was successful and the
product was then coupled directly with the acid 17 using
1,3-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), Hünigs’ base and DMAP
to give 19.
Lastly, removal of the allyl protecting group using standard
procedures with Pd(PPh3)4 and pyrrolidine gave an intermediate
carboxylic acid that was activated by forming N-hydrox-
ysuccinic ester with DCC and finally coupled with taurine
(H2NCH2CH2SO3H) to give natural product taurospongin A 1
(Scheme 3).1 The NMR data for 1 was consistent with the
previously synthesised material.2† For full characterization, our
synthetic sample was treated with diazomethane to give the
corresponding methyl ester 20,1 which turned out to be in
complete agreement with previously reported data of the
samples derived either from isolated or synthetic natural
products.1,2
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (a) cat. TEMPO, Aliquat® 336, KBr,
aq. NaOCl, aq. NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; (b) allyl bromide, i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2,
87% for two steps; (c) HF·py, THF; (d) 17, DIC, i-Pr2NEt, DMAP, CH2Cl2,
63% for two steps; (e) Pd(PPh3)4, pyrrolidine, CH2Cl2; (f) N-hydrox-
ysuccinimide, DCC, 1,4-dioxane; (g) taurine, NEt3, 1,4-dioxane, H2O, 97%
for three steps; (h) CH2N2, ether, 75%.
inhibitor of DNA polymerase b and HIV reverse tran-
scriptase.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the BP
endowment and the Novartis Research Fellowship (to SVL),
Uehara Foundation for a Postdoctoral Fellowship (to SY).
Notes and references
† The NMR data for 1: dH (600 MHz, CDCl3) 0.88 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.18
(3H, br s), 1.23–1.33 (33H, m), 1.42–1.60 (4H, m), 1.67–1.68 (1H, m),
1.91–1.95 (1H, m), 1.99–2.04 (2H, m), 2.05 (3H, s), 2.14–2.22 (4H, m), 2.31
(2H, br s), 2.44–2.46 (4H, m), 3.13 (2H, br s), 3.66 (2H, br s), 4.70 (1H, br
s), 4.91–4.95 (2H, m), 5.35–5.44 (2H, m), 7.74 (1H, br s); dC (150 MHz,
CDCl3) 14.1, 14.8, 19.1, 19.6, 20.0, 21.2, 22.7, 26.1, 26.8, 27.3, 29.3–31.9,
34.3, 34.9, 35.2, 40.4, 42.2, 46.5, 50.0, 68.5, 71.1, 71.8, 78.2, 80.7, 127.8,
In summary, we report new syntheses of the two fatty acid
components that are then used to construct taurospongin A, an
25
131.2, 171.0, 171.6, 173.2. Measured aD of synthetic product 1, [a]D
23.5 (c 0.37, CHCl3) has opposite sign to the reported data, [a]D27 +2.4 (c
25
0.2), although the aD of methyl ester 20, [a]D 21.4 (c 0.49, CHCl3) is
27
consistent with the reported data, [a]D 21.4 (c 0.78, CHCl3, ref. 1) and
[a]D 23.00 (c 0.53, CHCl3, ref. 2).
1 H. Ishiyama, M. Ishibashi, A. Ogawa, S. Yoshida and J. Kobayashi, J.
Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3831.
2 H. Lebel and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 9624.
3 (a) S. V. Ley, L. R. Cox and G. Meek, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 423; (b)
L. R. Cox and S. V. Ley, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1998, 27, 301.
4 (a) S. V. Ley, S. Burckhardt L. R. Cox and G. Meek, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1997, 3327; (b) S. V. Ley, L. R. Cox, G. Meek, K. H.
Metten, C. Pique and J. M. Worrall, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1997, 3299; (c) S. V. Ley and L. R. Cox, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 1997, 3315.
5 G. E. Keck, A. Palani and S. F. McHardy, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
3113.
6 (a) T. Katsuki and K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 5974;
(b) T. Katsuki and V. S. Martin, Org. React., 1996, 48, 1.
7 (a) F. A. Cotton and J. M. Troup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 3438; (b)
F. A. Cotton and J. M. Troup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 4422; (c)
A. M. Horton, D. M. Hollinshead and S. V. Ley, Tetrahedron, 1984, 40,
1737; (d) R. W. Bates, D. Diéz-Martin, W. J. Kerr, J. G. Knight, S. V.
Ley and A. Sakellaridis, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 4063.
8 (a) S. V. Ley, S. Burckhardt, L. R. Cox and J. M. Worrall, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 229; (b) S. V. Ley, S. Burckhardt, L. R. Cox and
J. M. Worrall, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 221.
9 (a) D. B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 4155; (b) D.
B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 7277.
10 (a) S. Ohira, Synth., Commun., 1989, 19, 561; (b) S. Müller, B. Liepold,
G. J. Roth and H. J. Bestmann, Synlett, 1996, 521.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, n-C16H33I, HMPA, THF,
220 °C ? rt, then 6 M H2SO4, 0 °C, 73%; (b) H2, Lindlar cat., quinoline;
(c) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, rt; (d) 15, K2CO3, MeOH, 84% for
three steps; (e) n-BuLi, 2-(3-bromopropoxy)tetrahydro-2H-pyran, HMPA,
THF, 220 ? 0 °C , 82%; (f) Jones reagent, acetone, 0 °C ? rt, 92%.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1624–1625
1625