314
X.-Q. Fang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 312–315
obtained consist of FDCNH (6%) and FDO (76%) with the latter as
the predominant product.
CN
CN
OO
NC
NC
NC
From the above analysis, it is seen that there is a mechanistic
extreme in the concerted electron-hydrogen atom transfer mecha-
nism, which is equivalent to direct hydride transfer.
O2
+
FDCN
Me-HEH
Fukuzumi and co-workers18 have recently reported the detailed
investigation on the borderline between one-step hydride transfer
and multistep electron transfer–proton transfer or electron–pro-
ton–electron transfer of NADH analogues in some specific reaction
systems.
CN
O
O
_
O
e
In the reaction of DPCN with Me-HEH in oxygen-saturated ace-
tonitrile, owing to the fact that the two phenyl groups are not
coplanar with C–C double bond and there is a methyl group on
the NADH model, the steric effect renders the reaction of oxygen
with the transition state feasible and BPO is obtained as the oxida-
tion product in addition to the reduction product.
Supporting evidence for concerted electron-hydrogen atom
transfer is also provided by the fact that the reaction of 1,1-di-p-
methoxyphenyl-2,2-dinitroethylene with BNAH to give high yield
(>90%) of 1,1-di-p-methoxyphenyl-2,2-dinitroethane, whereas
1,1-di-o-methoxyphenyl-2,2-dinitroethylene does not react with
BNAH even in the presence of magnesium perchlorate or upon irra-
diation with light, although it can be readily reduced to the corre-
sponding substituted ethane with sodium borohydride.19 This
retardation effect of the ortho substituent clearly indicates con-
certed electron-hydrogen atom transfer mechanism.20
In summary, by comparison of the reactions of HEH, Me-HEH,
and BNAH with FDCN and DPCN in deaerated acetonitrile21 and
oxygen-saturated acetonitrile22, it is reasonable to conclude that
all these reactions take place via an electron-hydrogen atom trans-
fer mechanism and the difference exists only in the degree of con-
certedness. The reaction of FDCN with HEH appears to represent
the extreme case of concerted hydride transfer.
Scheme 2. Mechanism of the formation of FDO.
FDO became the major product (76%) (Table 2, entry 3). The reac-
tion of DPCN with HEH still gave only the reduction product (Table
2, entry 4). Benzophenone (BPO) was isolated in the reactions of
DPCN with Me-HEH and BNAH in oxygen-saturated acetonitrile
with the yields of 2% and 11%, respectively (Table 2, entries 4
and 5). The ratios of BPO versus DPCNH decreased when compared
with that of FDO versus FDCNH.
With reference to the literature13 and our previous report,14 the
formation of FDO and BPO is attributed to the reactions of oxygen
with the anionic radicaloid species in the transition states formed
via electron transfer from the NADH models to FDCN and DPCN
(Scheme 2).
Table 3 gives the redox potentials of the reactants. A simple cal-
culation of the energy for an electron transfer would be prohibitive
for the reaction since the easiest one would be between BNAH and
FDCN, endothermic by about 30.2 kcal/mol
(
D
E = 23.02(Ered
À
Eox) kcal/mol). However, such an electron transfer would be
possible in a radical cation/radical anion complex. Charge transfer
complexes between NADH models and alkenes have been well
realized both in enzyme active site15 and in solution.16
Acknowledgments
The tightness of the electron-transfer complex is dependent
upon the redox potentials of the reactants as well as steric effect.
Large endothermicity of the electron-transfer reaction and smaller
steric effect should result in a tighter complex while smaller endo-
thermicity of the electron-transfer reaction and larger steric effect
should be associated with a looser complex. Thus, HEH, which is
planar and has the highest oxidation potential, should correspond
to a very tight complex. In addition, the bond dissociation energy
for C4–H bond of HEH is supposed to be of a relatively low value,17
the H-atom transfer should be easier to take place. It appears,
therefore, the reaction takes place via a completely concerted elec-
tron-hydrogen atom transfer mechanism and there is no feasibility
for oxygen to react with the transition state and no FDO is formed.
On the other hand, in the case of Me-HEH, because of the steric ef-
fect of the N-Me group, the transition state complex between Me-
HEH and FDCN is not so ‘tight’ as that between HEH and FDCN so
that it is feasible for oxygen molecule to approach and react with
the anionic radicaloid center to form a peroxidic intermediate,
which eventually transforms to FDO (Scheme 2).
We are grateful to National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant Nos. 20772115, 20802015, 20832004) and Specialized Re-
search Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
(20070358018) for support.
References and notes
1. (a) Ohno, A.; Yasuma, T.; Nabamura, K.; Oka, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59,
2905; (b) Ohno, A.; Oda, S.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamazaki, N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
6381.
2. Brewster, M. E.; Kaminsk, J. J.; Gabanyi, Z.; Czabo, K.; Simay, A.; Bodor, N.
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 4395.
3. Ge˛bicki, J.; Marcinek, A.; Zielonka, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 379.
4. Verhoeven, J. W.; Van Gerreskeim, W.; Martens, F. M.; Van der Kerk, S. M.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 975.
5. Pross, A.; Shaik, S. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 363 and references cited therein.
6. Anne, A.; Hapiot, P.; Moiroux, J.; Neta, P.; Savéant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 2951.
7. Dai, D.-M. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Science and Technology of China,
2003.
8. Xu, H.-J.; Dai, D.-M.; Liu, Y.-C.; Li, J.; Luo, S.-W.; Wu, Y.-D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 5739.
9. Liu, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Yang, Q.-C.; Mak, T. C. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
2000, 649.
10. (a) Yang, J. W.; Fonseca, M. T. H.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6660;
(b) Yang, J. W.; Fonseca, M. T. H.; Vignola, N.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 108; (c) Mayer, S.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4193; (d) Ouellet,
S. G.; Tuttle, J. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 32; (e) Yang, J.
W.; Fonseca, M. T. H.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15036; (f) Martin, N. J.
A.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13368; (g) Tuttle, J. B.; Ouellet, S. G.;
MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12662; (h) Hoffmann, S.;
Seayad, A. M.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7424; (i) Storer, R. I.;
Carrera, D. E.; Ni, Y.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 84; (j)
Hoffmann, S.; Nicoletti, M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13074; (k) Xu,
H.-J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Fu, Y.; Wu, Y.-D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3449.
BNAH has the lowest oxidation potential. It should form loose
electron-transfer complex. It is thus not surprising that when FDCN
reacts with BNAH in oxygen-saturated acetonitrile, the products
Table 3
Electrode potentials (V, vs Ag/AgCl) of NADH models, FDCN, and DPCN
FDCN
DPCN
HEH
1.01
Me-HEH
0.93
BNAH
0.63
Eox
11. (a) Merjer, H. P.; Van Niel, J. C. G.; Pandit, U. K. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 5185; (b)
Merjer, H. P.; Pandit, U. K. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 467; (c) Zhu, X.-Q.; Wang,
Ered
À0.68
À0.83