The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Article
saturated NaHCO (2 mL, bubbled violently). The organic layer was
3
then extracted with DCM five times, dried with Na SO , and
2
4
concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material 20 (yellow
oil) was then taken immediately for the next reaction. TLC analysis
(Rf = 0.54, silica gel, 60% ethyl acetate/hexane) during the reaction
seems not to be reliable as it shows full conversion almost
immediately, but if analysis is carried out, TLC of the crude material
then shows the starting material (almost no conversion). It was found
that letting the reaction run for 7 h instead and then working it up
showed full conversion via crude TLC.
To a one-neck oven-dried 50 mL round-bottom flask equipped
with a reflux condenser, the crude sulfolene enone 20 (40 mg
assumed, 0.16 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in toluene (15.7 mL,
formic acid (HCO H, 89 μL, 2.4 mmol, 7.5 equiv) were added
2
sequentially, and the evolution of H gas was observed. [N-[(1R,2R)-
2
2-(Amino-κN)-1,2-diphenylethyl]-4-methylbenzenesulfonamidato-
κN]chloro[(1,2,3,4,5,6-η)-1,3,5-trimethylbenzene]-ruthenium (RuCl-
[(R,R)-TsDPEN](mesitylene), 2 mg, 0.003 mmol, 1 mol %) was
added last, and the reaction was heated in an oil bath to reflux (30
°C). After the reaction via TLC analysis (24−48 h), the solution was
cooled and concentrated down under reduced pressure and passed
0
.01 M) and heated in an oil bath to reflux (150 °C). After the
reaction via TLC analysis (3 h), the flask was cooled to ambient
through 10% K CO /silica plug, using 65% ethyl acetate/hexane as
2 3
temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude
the eluent. The solution was concentrated down under reduced
pressure again, and the crude material 19 (clear oil) was then taken
immediately for the next reaction. Of particular note, for any transfer
of the crude mixture, ethyl acetate was found to be the most suitable
solvent. If the crude came into contact with DCM or deuterated
chloroform for the NMR analysis, it appeared to degrade very quickly
afterward before the next reaction could be carried out. NMR data
were recorded quickly in a single time; however, the sample degraded
before the material could be recovered and used in the next step. The
4
material was then purified via 10% K CO /silica chromatography
2
3
using 1−10% ethyl acetate/hexane as the gradient. Enone diene 17
was isolated as a yellow oil (18 mg, 60% over four steps, >10:1 ratio of
1
0
6
7:16, >98% ee). TLC: silica gel (10% ethyl acetate/hexane) R =
f
.20. [α]2 +76.2 (c 0.362, CHCl ); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ
0
1
D
3
3
.90 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (dd, J = 17.3, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (d, J
10.2 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 17.4 Hz, 1H),
=
5
1
.01 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (q, J = 6.5 Hz,
H), 2.60−2.50 (m, 2H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.39 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
use of a 10% K
opposed to traditional silica and celite plugs. HRMS data were
recorded as well. TLC: silica gel (60% ethyl acetate/hexane) R =
2 3
CO /silica plug appeared to less degrade 19 as
1
3
1
C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): δ 197.1, 150.8, 141.0, 137.2,
3
1
27.0, 126.2, 112.1, 77.3, 74.0, 33.8, 15.6, 12.2. HRMS-ESI (+) m/z:
f
1
+
0
1
2
6
.22. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 6.16−6.12 (m, 2H), 5.66 (br s,
3
H), 4.81 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.72−3.58 (m,
H), 3.29−3.07 (m, 2H), 2.14 (br s, 1H), 1.79 (br s, 3H), 1.50 (d, J =
1
3
1
.6 Hz, 3H). C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): δ (157.1, 157.0),
3
(
149.7, 149.6), 138.4, 118.0, (108.7, 108.7), (106.3, 106.2), (65.9,
6
5.8), (63.7, 63.6), 55.7, 26.9, (21.4, 21.3), 18.3. HRMS-ESI (+) m/z:
+
1
-(5-((3-Methyl-1,1-dioxido-2,5-dihydrothiophen-2-yl)-
methyl)furan-2-yl)ethan-1-one (18). A thick-walled sealed tube
reaction vessel was fitted with a stir bar and septa. The apparatus was
flame-dried under vacuum and then cooled under argon. Solvents
were prebubbled with argon for at least 10 min beforehand, and then
in a one-neck oven-dried round-bottom flask, ketone furyl diene (E)-
1
2 (110 mg, 0.6 mmol 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in the freshly bubbled
1
:1 mixture of 1,4-dioxane and H O (2.9 mL, 0.2 M) and cannulated
to the sealed tube. KHSO4 (472 mg, 3.5 mmol, 6.0 equiv) and
(2R,5S,6S)-2,5-Dimethyl-6-((E)-3-methylpenta-2,4-dien-1-
19,21,22
2
yl)dihydro-2H-pyran-3(4H)-one (21).
To a one-neck oven-
NaHSO (903 mg, 8.7 mmol, 15.0 equiv) were added to the reaction
dried 10 mL round-bottom flask, copper (I) iodide (CuI, 108 mg,
0.56 mmol, 3.0 equiv) was flame-dried under vacuum until it formed a
canary yellow color and then cooled under argon. Diethyl ether
4
vessel, and the tube was sealed and heated in an oil bath to the desired
temperature. After 24 h, the vessel was cooled down to 0 °C and
opened. If TLC analysis showed that the reaction was still in progress,
it was resealed and heated back up until the reaction was either
complete or if TLC analysis showed no further progression. The
(Et O, 1.0 mL) was then added, the solution was cooled to 0 °C, and
2
methyl lithium (MeLi, 3.1 M in diethyl ether, 371 μL, 1.15 mmol, 6.1
equiv) was added and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. The reaction turned
from a yellow color to orange and then became clear. In a separate
flask, enone diene 17 (12 mg, 0.06 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in
reaction was then diluted with ethyl acetate (0.1 M) and H O (0.1
2
M) and extracted with ethyl acetate four times. Organic layers were
then washed with brine, dried with Na SO , and concentrated under
Et O (1.35 mL) and cooled to −78 °C. The solution of the starting
2
2
4
reduced pressure. The crude material was purified via silica gel
column chromatography using 10−70% ethyl acetate/hexane as the
gradient to recover any unreacted ketone furyl diene 12 and sulfolene
ketone 18 as clear yellow oils. Sulfolene ketone 18 was solidified to a
yellow white solid (92 mg, 6−62%, 6−>99% BRSM) once
material was then cannulated to the in situ formed Gilman reagent at
−78 °C and stirred. The reaction turned from a yellow to orange
yellow color and eventually grew darker over time. Hours later, it
developed a dark brown-green color. After the reaction via TLC
analysis (5 h), it was removed from the bath and quenched slowly
concentrated under reduced pressure with diethyl ether three times
with H
mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate three times, washed with
brine, dried with Na SO , and concentrated under reduced pressure.
O (2.5 mL) and brought to ambient temperature. The crude
2
1
iteratively. TLC: silica gel (60% ethyl acetate/hexane) R = 0.24. H
f
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 7.11 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (dt, J =
2
4
3
3
3
3
1
.5, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (tt, J = 3.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.94−3.85 (m, 1H),
The crude material was purified via silica column chromatography
using 5% ethyl acetate/hexane as the eluent. β-Methyl ketone 21 was
isolated as a clear yellow oil (34.5 mg, 91%). TLC: silica gel (10%
.77−3.61 (m, 2H), 3.35−3.19 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.85−1.83 (m,
H). 13C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): δ 186.2, 155.5, 152.2, 137.6,
1
3
2
0
1
19.1, 118.4, 111.2, 65.5, 55.9, 26.9, 26.0, 18.2. HRMS-ESI (+) m/z:
ethyl acetate/hexane) R
NMR H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 6.39 (dd, J = 17.4, 10.7 Hz,
f
= 0.36. [α]
D
−19.6 (c 0.467, CHCl ); H
3
+
1
calcd for C H O SNa [M + Na] , 277.0505; found, 277.0502.
3
12
14
4
2
-((5-((R)-1-Hydroxyethyl)furan-2-yl)methyl)-3-methyl-2,5-
1H), 5.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 17.3 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (d, J =
10.7 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (td, J = 7.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H),
2.64 (dd, J = 15.2, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (dt, J = 14.0, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 2.38−
2.25 (m, 3H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 7.0
dihydrothiophene-1,1-dioxide (19). To a one-neck oven-dried 10
mL round-bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser, ketone
sulfolene 18 (80 mg, 0.31 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in DCM
1
3
1
(
3.1 mL, 0.1 M). Triethylamine (329 μL, 2.4 mmol, 7.5 equiv) and
Hz, 3H). C{ H} NMR (200 MHz, CDCl ): δ 208.9, 141.3, 136.1,
3
H
J. Org. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX