T. T. Fang et al. / Carbohydrate Research 342 (2007) 217–235
233
acquired with unit mass resolution in Q1 and Q3. Sam-
ples were introduced into the source of either instrument
in MeOH or MeOH–water mixtures having up to 5%
water or 18O water. High-resolution MS measurements
were carried out in the negative-ion mode on a Thermo-
quest 7 T FTICR instrument interfaced to a front end
linear ion trap equipped with a nanospray source (Finn-
igan LTQ-FTICR), located in the research resources
center at the University of Illinois at Chicago medical
center.
219 [MꢀH]ꢀ, m/z, relative abundance as % of base peak
bracketed: for 5, 71 (13%), 89 (14%), 101 (54%), 113
(21%), 143 (4%) 159 (10%), 161 (100%, base), 219
(10%, precursor); for 7, 71 (4%), 101 (18%), 113 (8%),
143 (2%), 159 (7%), 161 (100%, base), 219 (9%, precur-
sor). HRMS: [MꢀH]ꢀ, for 5, m/z 219.087 for
C9H15O6; Calcd 219.086; for 7, m/z 219.087 for
C9H15O6; Calcd 219.086. The allyl glucofuranosides
have not been previously prepared. NMR assignments
of a and b anomeric configuration were based on
similarity of the sugar ring J-couplings to the previously
assigned methyl glucofuranosides.35 For 9, allyl a-D-
3.2. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
1
glucofuranoside, H NMR (D2O): allyl group, d 4.274
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NMR spectroscopy was carried out at a field strength of
500 MHz (1H) on a Varian Inova instrument. Acquisi-
tions were performed on synthetic compounds in D2O
at 25 ꢁC with a trace of acetone as an internal chemical
shift standard at d = 2.225 ppm, and are reproducible to
within 0.002 ppm. 1H–1H J-couplings are accurate to
within 0.2 Hz. Assignments were made either through
decoupling in 1D experiments or through 2D gCOSY37
correlations. In some cases, a presaturation pulse was
applied to diminish the HOD peak intensity.
(dddd, 1H, J1 a,1 b ꢀ12.9, J1 a,2 5.6, J1 a,3 a 1.3, J1 a,3 b
1.3 Hz, H-10a), 4.149 (dddd, 1H, J1 b,2 6.2, J1 b,3 a 1.2,
J1 b,3 b 1.2 Hz, H-10b), 5.969 (dddd, 1H, J2 ,3 a 17.3,
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
J2 ,3 b 10.5 Hz, H-20), 5.350 (dddd, 1H, J3 a,3 b ꢀ1.5 Hz,
H-30a), 5.262 (dddd, 1H, H-30b), glucoside, 5.234 (d,
1H, J1,2 4.3 Hz, H-1), 4.169 (dd, 1H, J2,3 3.4 Hz, H-2),
4.316 (dd, 1H, J3,4 4.6 Hz, H-3), 4.126 (dd, 1H, J4,5
8.0 Hz, H-4), 3.884 (ddd, 1H, J5,6a 3.0, J5,6b 6.4 Hz, H-
5), 3.807 (dd, 1H, J6a,6b ꢀ12.0 Hz, H-6a), 3.657 (dd,
1H, H-6b). MS/MS: negative-ion, Paul trap, precursor
m/z 219 [MꢀH]ꢀ; m/z, relative abundance as % base
peak bracketed: 85 (1.3%), 101 (91%), 113 (4%), 161
(100%, base), 219 (6%, precursor). HRMS: [MꢀH]ꢀ,
for 9, m/z 219.087 for C9H15O6, Calcd 219.086. For
11, allyl b-D-glucofuranoside, 1H NMR (D2O): allyl
0
0
0
0
3.3. Synthesis of allyl glucosides
The allyl glucosides 5, 7, 9, and 11 (Scheme 2) were
prepared by Fischer-type glycosidation. D-Glucose
(100 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL of allyl alcohol by heat-
ing to about 90 ꢁC. The sample was cooled to room
temperature, trifluoroacetic acid (Aldrich, 0.385 mL)
was added to 1 M, and the mixture was heated in a
Teflon-capped tube under argon to 105 ꢁC for 26 h.
The sample was concentrated under high vacuum, and
dissolved in 0.5 mL water-followed by 4.5 mL aceto-
nitrile. The resultant allyl glycosides of all four configu-
rations and ring forms were separated by HPLC, first
in about 10 batches on a column (2.15 · 60 cm) of
glycopak N (Waters) eluted with 95:5 (v/v) acetonitrile
(Mallinckrodt, ChromAR grade)–water at 5 mL/min,
with detection by UV at 200 nm using a Waters 486
variable-wavelength detector. This purified both glucose
allyl pyranosides to homogeneity and separated them
from the furanosides. The furanosides were completely
separated (after concentration) on a column of Shodex
DC-613 (6 · 150 mm) converted to the Cs form,38 eluted
with 95:5 (v/v) acetonitrile–water at 0.6 mL/min, detect-
ing at 200 nm. The allyl a- and b-D-glucopyranosides 5
and 7 have been previously prepared and assigned using
1H MR at 270 MHz.39 Our data were essentially identi-
cal to that reported, except that at 500 MHz, small (1.1–
1.3 Hz) couplings were also observed between the allyl
H-10 and H-30 sets of protons, and approximately a
ꢀ1.5 Hz coupling was observed between the H-30a and
H-30b protons themselves. MS/MS spectra of com-
pounds 5 and 7, negative-ion, Paul trap, precursor m/z
0
0
0
0
group, d 4.209 (dddd, 1H, J1 a,1 b ꢀ12.8, J1 a,2 5.6,
J1 a,3 a 1.1, J1 a,3 b 1.1 Hz, H-10a), 4.080 (dddd, 1H,
0
0
0
0
J1 b,2 6.3, J1 b,3 a 1.0, J1 b,3 b 1.0 Hz, H-10b), 5.947 (dddd,
0
0
0
0
0
0
1H, J2 ,3 a 17.3, J2 ,3 b 10.4 Hz, H-20), 5.344 (dddd, 1H,
0
0
0
0
J3 a, 3 b ꢀ1.5 Hz, H-30a), 5.271 (dddd, 1H, H-30b), gluco-
side, 5.031 (s, 1H, J1,2 1.0 Hz, H-1), 4.176 (br s, 1H, J2,3
1.0 Hz, H-2), 4.262 (d, 1H, J3,4 4.6 Hz, H-3), 4.176
(overlapped with H-2, dd, 1H, J4,5 8.9 Hz, H-4), 3.990
(ddd, 1H, J5,6a 2.7, J5,6b 6.0 Hz, H-5), 3.859 (dd, 1H,
J6a,6b ꢀ12.0 Hz, H-6a), 3.696 (dd, 1H, H-6b). MS/MS:
negative-ion, Paul trap, precursor m/z 219 [MꢀH]ꢀ,
m/z, relative abundance as % base peak bracketed: 85
(1.4%), 101 (100%, base), 113 (7%), 161 (75%), 219
(7%, precursor). HRMS: [MꢀH]ꢀ, for 11, m/z 219.086
for C9H15O6; Calcd 219.086.
0
0
3.4. Synthesis of glucosyl-glycolaldehydes
The glucopyranoside-glycolaldehyde products 6 and 8
(Scheme 2) have been reported,39–42 but in only one
paper was the NMR spectrum of the a-D-glucopyrano-
syl-glycolaldehyde published but not fully assigned (in
Supplementary data of Ref. 40). In the other papers,
neither NMR nor MS data were reported as the sugar-
glycolaldehydes were directly converted to Schiff base
products.39,41,42 The glucosyl-glycolaldehydes 6, 8, 10,
and 12 were prepared directly from the purified allyl
glycosides. Allyl glycosides 5, 7, 9, or 11 (10 mg) were