Enantioselective allylic substitution catalyzed by an iridium complex:
remarkable effects of the counter cation
a
a
b
a
Kaoru Fuji,* Naosumi Kinoshita, † Kiyoshi Tanaka and Takeo Kawabata
a
Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan. E-mail: fuji@scl.kyoto-v.ac.jp
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan
b
Received (in Cambridge, UK) 22nd September 1999, Accepted 4th October 1999
Allylic substitution of a methyl carbonate of cinnamyl
alcohol with the anion of dimethyl malonate gave the
branched olefin with high enantioselectivity in the presence
of (S)-1,1A-binaphthyl-2,2A-diyl phenyl phosphite when a
combination of lithium and zinc was used as counter
cation.
alkylation with soft carbon nucleophiles catalyzed by an iridium
1
4
5
6
complex. Chiral phosphites 1, 2 and 3 have been used as
ligands. Diethylzinc was used as a base because it is known to
give a greater ee than other bases in allylic alkylations catalyzed
7
by a palladium–(R)-BINAP complex. The results are shown in
Table 1. Both electron-releasing and -withdrawing groups on
the phenyl rings of the ligands gave lower ees (entries 2 and 3)
Unlike palladium-catalyzed allylic alkylations, iridium-cata-
lyzed alkylations take place at the more substituted allylic
2 2
than the parent phosphite (S)-1 (entry 1). CH Cl is the solvent
of choice (compare entry 1 with entries 4–6). Allylic methyl
carbonate 4b gave a better yield than the corresponding acetate
4a in a shorter reaction time (entries 1 and 7).
The effect of the counter cation was investigated using 4b,
and the results are shown in Table 2. A conspicuous feature of
these results is that the proportion of (R)-5 to (S)-5 increases as
1
terminus. Recently, asymmetric versions of this reaction have
2
been reported, where chiral phosphinooxazolines or phospho-
3
rous amidites were used as ligands. We report here enantio-
selective allylic substitutions catalyzed by an iridium complex
of chiral aryl phosphite (S)-1.
the ionic character of the malonate anion increases (entries 1–3).
t
Thus, (R)-5 was obtained in 36% ee by using Bu P
4
base, which
is known to generate naked anions.8 Metals, such as lithium
and zinc, that strongly coordinate with anion gave (S)-5 as the
major enantiomer. The intermediacy of a p-allyl–iridium
complex has been suggested for iridium complex-catalyzed
,9
1
allylic alkylation with triphenyl phosphite as ligand. On the
other hand, the involvement of a s-allyl–iridium complex is
3
indicated for the alkylation of secondary allylic acetates.
Although there is an apparent divergence of mechanistic
considerations, the p-allyl–iridium complex is more likely than
the s-complex when aryl phosphites are used as ligands. The
predominant formation of (S)-5 with lithium and/or zinc as the
We chose 4a as a standard substrate to avoid ambiguities
arising from a chiral centre (Scheme 1), although the ester of an
isomeric secondary alcohol, 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol, can also
be a substrate for the same reaction. It has been reported that the
iridium-catalyzed allylic substitution of acetates of secondary
alcohols proceeds with 70–80% retention of configuration.
Aryl phosphites are known to be efficient ligands for allylic
3
†
Present address: Pharmaceutical Production Department, Tokushima
Second Factory, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hiraishi Ebisuno 224-18,
Kawauchi-cho, Tokushima 771-0182, Japan.
Scheme 1
Table 1 Ir-catalysed allylic alkylation of 4a and 4b with dimethyl malonate using ZnEt
2
as baseab
Ratio of 5 : 6
Reaction
time/h
Combined yield of
5 and 6 (%)
Ee of
(S)-5 (%)
GLCc
1H NMR
d
Entry
Substrate
Ligand
Solvent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
4b
4b
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
CH
CH
CH
toluene
THF
2
2
2
Cl
Cl
Cl
2
2
2
35
94
47
47
91
48
7
58 (64)e
57
92 : 8
92 : 8
94 : 6
82 : 18
84 : 16
86 : 14
96 : 4
—
—
76
61
32
67
20
54
71
55
91 : 9
96 : 4
81 : 19
85 : 15
81 : 19
95 : 5
85 : 15
62
57 (58)
40 (49)
13 (29)
e
e
e
MeCN
CH
2
Cl
2
88
44 (65)
e
THF
68
a
General procedure (entry 1): A solution of (S)-1 (81.7 mg, 0.2 mmol), [Ir(COD)Cl]
dry CH Cl (1 ml) was stirred for 45 min under argon. To this solution was added a solution prepared by stirring dimethyl malonate (133 mg, 1.0 mmol) and
Et Zn (1.0 M in hexane, 1.0 ml) in CH Cl (3 ml) under argon for 1 h at room temperature. After stirring for the indicated time, usual extractive work-up
with EtOAc followed by preparative TLC (EtOAc–hexane 1+6) gave 58 mg of a mixture of 5 and 6. All reactions were performed at room temperature.
2
(33.6 mg, 0.05 mmol) and cinnamyl acetate (83.1 ml, 0.5 mmol) in
2
2
2
2
2
b
c
Determined by GLC on a Chirasil-DEX CB column at 150 °C. d Determined by HPLC on CHIRALCEL OJ-R (MeOH–H
e
2
O = 75+25). The number in
parenthesis indicates the yield based on the consumed starting material.
Chem. Commun., 1999, 2289–2290
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 1999
2289