chlorides with pendant simple amines. Moreover, the high
cost of palladium invites less expensive alternatives.
We initially reported the use of 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy)-bound
Ni(0) clusters, generated in situ by reduction of a nickel(II)
salt with alkoxide-activated sodium hydride, to mediate the
coupling of aryl chlorides with secondary cyclic and acyclic
amines.14 The use of a Pd(0)/N-heterocyclic carbene15 (NHC)
catalyst system for the amination of aryl chlorides was first
described by Hartwig16 and Nolan.17 Following up on this
work, we have recently reported the use of a Ni(0) catalyst
associated with a strong electron-donating and sterically
hindered NHC (N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)dihydro-
imidazol-2-ylidene, SIPr) to allow mild amination of aryl
chlorides with several classes of amines.18 Motivated by the
extension of this method and by increased understanding of
Ni-catalyzed amination reactions, we report herein an
alternative synthesis of nitrogen heterocycles from aryl
chlorides with pendant amino groups by intramolecular
Ni(0)-catalyzed N-arylation reactions.
Figure 1. NHC precursors used for the nickel-catalyzed amination
reaction.
% Ni in dioxane, whereas with bpy as ligand, reactions
required 5 mol % Ni and better results were obtained in THF
compared to dioxane. During our optimization efforts, the
influence of the nickel/ligand ratio was also investigated. We
have found that with SIPr as supporting ligand, a 1:1 nickel-
ligand ratio afforded optimum reaction rates, whereas with
bpy, a 1:3 nickel-ligand ratio was found to be the most
effective. We have subsequently verified in control experi-
ments containing all of the reagents, except Ni(0) and ligand,
that without catalyst, only traces amounts of indoline were
obtained (entries 13 and 14).
Using SIMes or SITol as ligand gave poor results. Even
with 10 mol % Ni, the reaction reached only 13% and 9%
yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 9 and 10), showing that
SIPr is a much better ligand for this Ni-catalyzed C-N bond-
forming reaction and that the steric hindrance of the ligand
is responsible for the improved catalytic performances. The
use of phen (Table 1, entry 11) led to complex mixtures
where 53% of the starting material, 43% dechlorinated
N-benzyl-N-(2-chlorophenethyl)amine, and only 4% N-
benzylindoline were observed. A catalyst based on the dppf
ligand also possesses lower activity than Ni/SIPr or Ni/bpy
for intramolecular Ni-catalyzed C-N bond forming reactions
(Table 1, entry 12).
The cyclization of N-benzyl-N-(2-chlorophenethyl)amine
into N-benzylindoline was first studied to establish the most
effective conditions (Table 1).
Table 1. Optimization of Conditionsa
entry mol % Ni conditions ligand
solvent
yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
10
10
5
2
10
5
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
A
B
SIPr
SIPr
SIPr
SIPr
bpy
bpy
bpy
bpy
THF
77
97
94
95
84
84
52
47
13
9
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
THF
THF
THF
The intramolecular aryl amination was applied to various
aryl chlorides using the two sets of optimized conditions,
method A for Ni/bpy (Table 1, entry 6) and method B for
Ni/SIPr (Table 1, entry 4) catalysis. Note that method A is
not effective for the arylation of primary amines.18b
Treatment of amino aryl chlorides with a nickel catalyst
and a base in THF for Ni/bpy catalyst or 1,4-dioxane for
2
2
dioxane
10
10
10
10
-
SIMes dioxane
SITol
phen
dppf
bpy
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
THF
4
55
8
(14) (a) Brenner, E.; Fort, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5359-5362.
(b) Brenner, E.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12829-
12842. (c) Desmarets, C.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 2875-2879. (d) Brenner, E.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 2881-2884. (e) Desmarets, C.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2001, 42, 247-250. (f) Desmarets, C.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7657-7664. (g) Brenner, E.; Schneider, R.; Fort,
Y. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6913-6924. (h) Desmarets, C.; Schneider, R.;
Fort, Y.; Walcarius, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 1844-1849.
(15) Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290-1309.
(16) Stauffer, S. R.; Lee, S.; Stambuli, J. P.; Hauck, S. I.; Hartwig, J.
F. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1423-1426.
-
SIPr
dioxane
9
a Reaction conditions A: 10.0 mmol of N-benzyl-N-(2-chlorophenetyl)-
amine, L/Ni ) 3/1, 1.0 mmol of NaO-t-Bu, 9.5 mmol of NaH, 0.5 mmol
of styrene, 15 mL of solvent, reflux, 5 h. Reaction conditions B: 10 mmol
of N-benzyl-N-(2-chlorophenethyl)amine, L/Ni ) 1/1, 15 mmol of NaO-
t-Bu, 15 mL of solvent, reflux, 5 h. b Isolated yield; average of two runs.
(17) For recent reports, see: (a) Viciu, M. S.; Kelly, R. A., III; Stevens,
E. D.; Naud, F.; Studer, M.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1479-1482.
(b) Viciu, M. S.; Kissling, R. M.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 2229-2231. (c) Grasa, G. A.; Viciu, M. S.; Huang, J.; Nolan, S.
P. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7729-7737.
Besides SIPr and bpy (which were typically used in our
previous reports of intermolecular arylation of amines), other
NHCs, 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), and dppf (1,1′-bis-
(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) used by Buchwald19 and
Lipshutz20 in aryl aminations catalyzed by Ni(cod)2 were
tested as ligands. With SIPr or bpy as ligand, the reaction
went smoothly to completion without any formation of
undesired byproducts (Table 1, entries 4 and 6). With the
Ni/SIPr catalyst, reactions were best performed with 2 mol
(18) (a) Gradel, B.; Brenner, E.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 5689-5692. (b) Desmarets, C.; Schneider, R.; Fort, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3029-3036.
(19) Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6054-
6058.
(20) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Ueda, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
4492-4494. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Tasler, S.; Chrisman, W.; Spliethoff, B.;
Tesche, B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1177-1189. (c) Tasler, S.; Lipshutz,
B. H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1190-1199.
2312
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 13, 2003