TABLE 1
Yields of PCDD/F (in nmol/g of Fly Ash)a
experiment
no.
reactant
atmosphere ∑PCDD
∑PCDF
1b
2c
3d
DF
N2, O2, HCl 0.09 ( 0.02 0.98 ( 0.03
1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD N2, HCl
1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD O2,HCl
2.37 ( 0.66 0.01 ( 0.01
3.02 ( 0.03 0.003
a
b
All experim ents in duplicate, m ean value ( range is given. 2.0 g
of fly ash with 33 nm ol/g DF; T ) 348 ( 7 °C; 50-m in reaction; flow: N2
c
112 ( 2 m L/m in, O2 12 m L/m in, HCl 6.5 ( 2.2 m L/m in. 1.0-1.1 g of fly
ash with 3.19 (s ) 0.37) nm ol/g 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD; T ) 248 ( 7 °C; 15-
d
m in reaction; flow: N2 59 ( 1 m L/m in, HCl 5.5 m L/m in. Sam e as under
footnote c, but with flow of O2 57 ( 1 m L/m in, HCl 5.5 m L/m in.
congeners were analyzed. 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD was checked
for contamination. A purity of 103% was found, which is
not significantly different from the 99% guaranteed by the
manufacturer. Heating a sample of carbon-free fly ash at
350 °C in a N2/ O2/ HCl mixture resulted in 0.05 nmol/ g
PCDD and 0.11 nmol/ g PCDF. The cleanup procedure,
the fly ash, and the DF were all checked for background
PCDD/ F. Results were in-between 0.011 and 0.023 nmol/ g
∑PCDD/ PCDF. These contributions are negligible when
compared with the amount of PCDD/ F formed during our
experiments.
FIGURE 1. Route of chlorination and dechlorination for 1,2,3,4,7,8-
H CDD (Cl atoms are not shown).
6
chlorination mechanism for DF holds on fly ash too and
can explain part of the PCDF formed.
The preferred formation of 2,3,7,8 congeners from DF
differs from the isomer distribution that is found in de novo
synthesis experiments under similar conditions. Typically,
at 348 °C in a N2/ O2/ HCl mixture with carbon as a reactant
on fly ash, no preference for 2,3,7,8-substitution occurs
(11), indicating that DF is not an intermediate in de novo
synthesis of PCDF from carbon.
Chlorination of 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD. Chlorination ex-
periments with 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD were carried out at 248
°C (experiments 2 and 3, Table 1). We chose this tem-
perature to compare the results of these experiments with
those described below (studying dechlorination and de-
composition). We used mixtures of N2/ HCl (experiment 2)
and O2/ HCl (experiment 3). This makes a comparison
possible of the influence of these gases, which are both
present in incinerator flue gas, on chlorination processes.
We chose a short reaction time (15 min) to avoid that the
chlorination process would proceed toward an almost 100%
formation of OCDD, which would eliminate useful infor-
mation regarding the chlorination pathway at the hep-
tachlorodibenzodioxin level.
In N2, a great variance was seen between duplicate
experiments, resulting in a mass balance of between 54
and 95%. With O2, we obtained a mass balance of 94-96%.
We calculated this mass balance by (∑T4CDD-OCDD/
1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD before experiment) × 100%. No sig-
nificant amounts of PCDF were detected, and the trans-
formation PCDD f PCDF does not occur. Our results show
that chlorination takes place in both atmospheres. Griffin
(13) has suggested that HCl passed over fly ash is converted
to Cl2 (Deacon reaction) according to:
Results and Discussion
In Table 1, the results ofexperiments with DF and 1,2,3,4,7,8-
H6CDD are reported.
Chlorination of DF. We chose to perform the experi-
ment with DF under similar conditions as in the post-
combustion chamber in an incinerator, i.e., at 348 °C, and
in a N2/ O2/ HCl mixture. To make a comparison with de
novo synthesis experiments possible, we performed the
experiment at typical de novo synthesis reaction times: 50
min.
Ca. 3% of the DF is converted to T4CDF-OCDF
congeners (experiment 1), which is somewhat higher than
the 0.3-1.0% found by Luijk for chlorination of DF on
Al2O3-SiO2 at 250-300 °C (12). The higher temperature
during experiment 1 (348 °C) might explain the difference.
Some PCDD is formed in experiment 1, 0.09 nmol/ g. As
described under Cleanup and Analysis, some background
formation of PCDD from organics left on the fly ash will
occur, and the 0.09 nmol/ g may stem partially from that
source. It does not constitute proof of the transformation
of DF to DD.
When setting ∑T4CDF-OCDF ) 100%, ca. 70% of the
PCDF formed is OCDF. Under the reaction conditions used,
where HCl is present as a chlorinating agent, dechlorination
of PCDF formed is obviously not a predominant pathway.
The isomer distributions within the various PCDF
homologues show a distinct trend toward 2,3,7,8-substitu-
tion. The order of chlorination 2,3,7,8 (ca. 25%) f 1,2,3,7,8
(ca. 34%) f 1,2,3,4,7,8 (ca. 53%) f 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 (ca. 91%)
is clearly observed. The relative contribution of these
isomers within their homologues is given in parentheses.
The increase from 25% for 2,3,7,8-T4CDF to 91% for
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-H7CDF can be explained by the conversion of
structurally related isomers. Within the T4CDF group,
isomers other than 2,3,7,8, e.g., 1,2,3,7 and 1,2,7,8, which
can also be converted to 1,2,3,7,8, are present at percentages
of ca. 10%. Thus, the 1,2,3,7,8-P5CDF isomer is formed at
higher percentages than 2,3,7,8-T4CDF, because it can be
formed from more than one T4 isomer. The electrophilic
2HCl + 1/ 2O2 f H2O + Cl2
Since in experiment 2 with N2 no O2 was present, this
pathway should not be operative. Therefore other chlo-
rination routes must exist. The Deacon reaction may be
partially responsible for the chlorination of 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6-
CDD in experiment 3.
Cold traps were not analyzed separately, and the amount
of 1,2,3,4,7,8-H6CDD evaporating from the fly ash surface
9
8 3 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 30, NO. 3, 1996