102
X.M. Chen et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 21 (2010) 101–104
in equipment, and simplicity in operation. This process has been effectively used to degrade several pollutants [5,6],
oxidizing them, not only to CO2 and H2O, but to biodegradable products using mediated and/or direct electrochemical
oxidation (EO). SA is a key ingredient in many skin-care products. This aromatic organic compound is very toxic and
it is widely present in pharmaceutical industrial effluents, so-called ‘‘pharmaceutical pollution’’. SA can stimulate skin
and mucous membrane, and reacts with protein, and it can bring about tinnitus, qualm, naupathia and electrolytic
turbulence. Therefore, effective removal of SA from wastewaters is very important.
1. Experimental
FP and UV/H2O2 experiments were performed in the same degradation system, applying or not radiation,
containing with a high pressure mercury lamp TQ 718 of 250 W (Heraeus Noblelight Company in Germany). The
reactor was cylindrical (25 cm  5 cm of diameter), capacity of 0.5 L, and it was made of quartz glass available for
radiation transfer. Different [H2O2]/[SA] molar ratios, [Fe2+] and pH were used to establish the most favorable
experimental conditions in this work. The electrochemical reactor (ER) was 130 mm high and 30 mm in diameter, and
was operated in batch. More details about the ER can be found elsewhere [6]. The current density (J = 200 A mÀ2) was
applied with a Tacussel model PJT24-1 (24 V–1 A) potentiostat–galvanostat at 25 8C and 0.2 mol/L Na2SO4 as
supporting electrolyte. Ta/BDD was used as anode, and a stainless steel plate was used as cathode. Samples were
analyzed for determining the concentration changes of SA and by-products by High Performance Liquid
Chromatograph (Varian Model 9050/9012 HPLC equipped with a Nucleosil C18 column (4.6 mm  250 mm); mobile
phase: phosphoric acid (solution at pH 2): acetonitrile 35:65, at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min; the UV detector was set at
300 nm). Chromatographic retention times were compared with those of commercially available standards. Chemical
oxygen demand (COD) was measured using COD reactor and direct reading spectrophotometer. SA solutions of 1000
or 800 mg/L (Fluka reagent) were prepared using ultrapure deionized water. For each experiment, the pH was adjusted
to around 4 with NaOH. H2O2 was added as a concentrated solution (3%). Fe2+ solutions were prepared with
FeSO4Á6H2O. In the case of the FP, pH was set at the desired value before the startup, and then a given amount of iron
salt was added and mixed very well with SA before the addition of H2O2. For runs using the UV/H2O2 system, H2O2
was injected into the reactor before the beginning of each run. The temperature of the solution during the reaction was
fixed at 25 8C and maintained constant by using a water thermostat.
2. Results and discussion
To determine the most favorable concentrations of Fe2+ and H2O2 in the FP, experiments were carried out at 14
different [H2O2]/[SA] molar ratios. After that, subsequent experiments were performed at the best [H2O2]/[SA] molar
ratio for five different Fe2+ molar concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mmol/L), obtaining that at
[Fe2+] = 0.6 mmol/L and [H2O2]/[SA] = 7 were achieved the better performances. pH effect on the SA removal
efficiency for FP and UV/H2O2 was studied, experiments were carried out in the pH range 2–14, under the above-
mentioned conditions, showed that pH ꢁ4–5 were achieved high SA removal. Fig. 1A shows the elimination of SA as
well as the formation and partial disappearance of the main reaction intermediates (2,3-dihydroxy benzoic acid (2,3-
DHBA); 2,5-dihydroxy benzoic acid (2,5-DHBA); and catechol (CT)) by FP. Complete elimination of SA was
achieved after 180 min. As for the intermediates, only 2,5-DHBA and CT were almost completely eliminated; an
amount of 2,3-DHBA remained in solution increasing the time of the complete elimination (adding more Fe2+ or H2O2
for the reaction). Further intermediates (malic, maleic, and fumaric acids) [7] were oxidized to oxalic acid. Oxalic acid
is slowly transformed into CO2, but it forms Fe/oxalate complexes mainly. In the case of UV/H2O2, it occurs under
irradiation (280 nm) of the pollutant solution containing H2O2. This causes the homolytic cleavage of H2O2 [1,7].
Different [H2O2]/[SA] molar radio and pH were tested in order to determine the most favorable conditions, obtaining
that [H2O2]/[SA] = 6 and pH 4 achieved the best performances (next experiments were performed under these
experimental conditions). Then, during the UV/H2O2 oxidation of SA, the main product was 2,3-DHBA, whereas CT
and 2,5-DHBA were produced in minor amounts. The complete elimination of SA was not achieved (Fig. 1B).
Complete elimination (SA and malic, maleic and fumaric acids) was verified by analytical techniques after 23.5 h. In
the AO at Ta/BDD electrode, several experiments were realized for 200 A mÀ2 and pH ꢁ4. Fig. 2A shows that the AO
of SA is completely achieved after 8 h of electrolysis, showing that insignificant amounts of CT, 2,3 and 2,5-DBHA
were detected. Based on HPLC measurements, the rate of SA and by-products oxidation is faster due to the reactivity