236
B. Lihong et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 617 (2014) 235–239
Up to now, many synthesis methods [26–30] have been devel-
(111), (210) and (211), which belongs to the cubic crystal system
with the Pm-3m space group.
oped to prepare the RB6 nanopowder for a low reaction tempera-
ture, easy to handle precursors, simple process controlled and
low cost. Here, we report a simple and novel method for preparing
the nanocrystalline RB6 (R = Ce, Eu) by a solid-state reaction of
R2O3 with NaBH4 in a continuous evacuating conditions. In this
way, we have found the trivalent CeB6 can be obtained using the
mixed valence of CeO2 as raw materials, which is confirmed by
the study of X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES). The
effects of reaction temperature on the crystal phase, size and mor-
phology were characterized by using XRD, FESEM and HRTEM.
3.3. The morphology and microstructure of RB6 nanocrystals
In order to better obtain the information of grain sizes and typ-
ical shapes of as-synthesized RB6 products grown under different
experimental conditions, the field emission scanning electron
microscopy (FESEM) are used to observe the grain morphology. It
can be seen from Fig. 3(a) that the CeB6 prepared at 1000 °C is com-
posed of a great deal of aggregated nanoparticle and a small num-
ber of cubic body with a size of 10–20 nm shown in the upper side
of magnified SEM. When the reaction temperature is increased to
1100 °C, the nanoparticle convert into small crystalline nanocube
with a size of 50–100 nm shown in Fig. 3(b). But it is also found
that the CeB6 crystals are adhered together to show a less distribu-
tions and other some amounts of large-sized non-cubic morphol-
ogy crystals observed in this reaction temperature of 1100 °C.
The reason is might be the aggregations raw material of CeO2
formed the non-cubic morphology of large grains, which lead to
the prepared powder less uniformed and distributions.
2. Experiments
The CeO2 (99.99% purity), Eu2O3 (99.9% purity) and NaBH4 99.0 purity) powder
in a fixed molar ratios were mixed in an agate mortar for an hour. Then the mix-
tures were put into a quartz tube and placed in the resistance furnace at a reaction
temperature in the range from 900 to 1200 °C for 2 h. Whole reaction was kept
under a vacuum of 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ2 bar. The phase identification was examined by X-ray
diffraction (Cu Ka radiation, Philips PW1830). The crystal morphology was charac-
terized by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM: Hitachi SU-8010)
and the microstructure is characterized by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM: FEI-Tecnai F20 S-Twin 200 kV). The XANES measurement was carried out
using synchrotron radiation at the BL-12A station of Photon Factory, Japan.
Fig. 4 shows the FESEM image of EuB6 prepared at 1000–1200 °C.
It is interestingly found from Fig. 4(a) that there are a large number
of small cubic grains not nanoparticle, which grain size in the range
of 10–20 nm at the reaction temperature of 1000 °C. Subsequently,
while the reaction temperature elevated to 1100 °C, the perfect
small nanocubes maintained the grain size of 30 nm and cubic mor-
phology. However, when the reaction temperature increasing to
1100 and 1200 °C, there shows an obvious grain-growth behavior,
which grain size increased to 50 and 100 nm respectively. One of
the important factors for the grains growth is the high specific sur-
face and high diffusion coefficients of nanocube have cause to mass
transport through lattice and grain boundaries to grain growth.
Comparing the SEM observations of EuB6 with CeB6, we have found
the EuB6 crystals show a more uniform distribution than CeB6. This
is due to raw materials of Eu2O3 is more uniform than CeB6.
In order to further study the microstructure of RB6 nanocrystal at
different reaction temperature, the TEM as an effective character-
ization method to be used to observe the grain morphology and
crystallinity. Herein, the EuB6 as an example to be given the analyses
in Fig. 5 with the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern
and the high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image. It can be seen from
images that it is mainly composed by the large amounts of spherical
nanoparticle and small amount of nanocube with a mean size of
10 nm, which insert magnified TEM fully confirmed the degree of
crystallinity. Its corresponding SAED pattern can be indexed to
(200) and (210) planes, indicating at initial temperature of 900 °C
the ultrafine nanoparticles and nanocrystal are coexist. While the
reaction temperature increase from 900 to 1100 °C, the nanoparticle
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of the raw materials
It is necessary to study the microstructure of raw materials
because the particle sizes of raw materials have influence on the
grain size of final products in solid-state reaction. Fig. 1(a) shows
the particle morphology of CeO2 powders, it displays a nearly
spherical morphology with a size in the range 50–100 nm except
for a small number of aggregations. Comparing with Fig. 1(b), it
can be found the Eu2O3 powder displays a uniform distributions
and spherical morphology with a size of 40 nm, some of them
are adhered together to show a liner shape.
3.2. Phase identification of RB6 nanocrystals
Fig. 2(a) shows the XRD patterns of CeB6 prepared at 1000–
1150 °C holding for 2 h. The diffraction peaks of prepared at 1000
and 1150 °C can be assigned to the CaB6 main phase and small
amounts of LaBO3 impurity phase detected, which is might be
needed more acid-washing to exclude them. There is also small
amounts of impurity is detected from Fig. 2(b) when the EuB6 pre-
pared at 1100 °C. Comparing Fig. 2(a) with (b) it can be concluded
that the optimization reaction temperature of CeB6 and EuB6 are
1100 and 1150 °C, respectively. Their diffraction peaks are well
indexed and assigned to the parallel crystal plane of (100), (110),
Fig. 1. FESEM image of raw materials, (a) CeO2 and (b) Eu2O3.