062505-3
Kang, Lewis, and Moodenbaugh
Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 062505 ͑2005͒
FIG. 3. X-ray spectra for samples ͑a͒ in as-spun state and ͑b͒ heated in
zero-field, and ͑c͒ 10 kOe field conditions.
FIG. 4. dc M-T curve measured at 10 Oe and the real component Ј of the
ac-susceptibility ac for a sample with aligned MnBi particles oriented along
the applied field direction.
single crystal in a magnetic field ͑15–20 kOe͒ oriented per-
pendicular to the easy magnetization c-axis of the crystal
causes the crystal to subdivide and recrystallize with an ori-
entation parallel to the field. It should be noted that a rela-
tively high heating temperature of 603 K and a very long
annealing time ͑2500 min͒ are required in that study for re-
crystallization. In contrast, in the present study complete par-
ticle alignment was achieved in the present study within 60 s
at the lower temperature of 525 K. On the other hand, Ren et
This manuscript has been authored by Brookhaven Sci-
ence Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH1-
8
86 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States
Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the ar-
ticle for publication, acknowledges, a world-wide license to
publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript,
or allow others to do so, for the United States Government
purposes.
1
8
al. reported the alignment of coarse MnBi crystallites in
MnBi-Bi eutectic rods in 30 min under the action of a
1
G. Eilers, M. Doi, and Massaki Matsui, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 34,
6
053 ͑1995͒.
10 kOe magnetic field at 573 K. Employing metallographic
2
3
4
K. Kang, Z. G. Zhang, and T. Suzuki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 404 ͑2004͒.
T. Suzuki and K. Ouchi, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 2347 ͑2004͒.
P. M. Oppeneer, V. N. Antonov, T. Kraft, H. Eschrig, A. N. Yaresko, and
A. Ya. Perlov, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1099 ͑1996͒.
T. Chen and W. E. Stutius, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-10, 581 ͑1974͒.
D. Chen and R. L. Aagard, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 2530 ͑1970͒.
Y. J. Wang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 84, 39 ͑1990͒.
analyses, they estimated a crystallite deviation angle of 15°
from the direction of the applied magnetic field and hypoth-
esized that a rotation of the crystallites was driven by mag-
netostatic forces balanced by frictional forces of the semi-
solid matrix. It is therefore reasonable to suggest that the
abrupt c-axis reorientation of the MnBi nanorods observed in
our sample upon cooling from 525 to 520 K arises from par-
ticle rotation along the applied magnetic field direction.
In addition to exhibiting a remanence ratio approaching
unity, samples with aligned MnBi nanorods allow effective
study of the spin reorientation, which is reported to be in the
5
6
7
8
K. U. Harder, D. Menzel, T. Widmer, and J. Schoenes, J. Appl. Phys. 84,
3625 ͑1998͒.
J. J. Beker, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-4, 239 ͑1968͒.
9
0
1
W. M. Yim and E. J. Stofko, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 5211 ͑1967͒.
J. M. Noorthoven van Goor and H. Zijlstra, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5471
11
2͑
1968͒.
1
M. R. Notis, Dilip M. Shah, Steven P. Young, and C. D. Graham, Jr., IEEE
Trans. Magn. MAG-15, 957 ͑1979͒.
3
2
2–24
vicinity of 90–100 K in bulk MnBi samples.
It was not
1
K. Kang, L. H. Lewis, and A. R. Moodenbaugh, J. Appl. Phys. 97,
possible to definitively ascertain the spin reorientation tem-
perature in the isotropic MnBi-Bi nanocomposite due to the
141
0K302 ͑2005͒.
S. Saha, R. T. Obermyer, B. J. Zande, V. K. Chandhok, S. Simizu, and J.
A. Horton, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 8525 ͑2002͒.
1
3
broadness of the transition. Ac susceptibility ac data from
the aligned sample shown in Fig. 4 reveals a bump in the real
component Ј at Tϳ100 K which is attributed to the spin
reorientation from along the c-axis toward the ab-plane with
cooling. The corresponding dc magnetization M measured in
a 10 Oe field decreases gradually with decreasing tempera-
ture from Tϳ250 K and shows no further change as the
temperature decreases below ϳ100 K. These data indicate
that the spin reorientation temperature in nanoscaled MnBi
does not differ from its bulk value. In contrast, the Curie
temperature of this nanocomposite was found to be de-
1
1
5
X. Guo, A. Zaluska, Z. Altounian, and J. O. Ström-Olsen, J. Mater. Res.
5
, 2646 ͑1990͒.
J. B. Yang, K. Kamaraju, W. B. Yelon, and W. J. James, Appl. Phys. Lett.
9, 1846 ͑2001͒.
6
7
17
E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
240, 599 ͑1948͒.
8
1
Z. Ren, H. Wang, K. Deng, and K. Xu, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 311
9͑
2004͒.
1
B. W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. 104, 607 ͑1956͒.
20
A. F. Andresen, W. Hälg, P. Fischer, and E. Stoll, Acta Chem. Scand.
1͑
1947-1973͒ 21, 1543 ͑1967͒.
2
T. Chen and W. E. Stutius, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4622 ͑1974͒.
Y. Liu, J. Zhang, G. Jia, X. Zhang, Z. Ren, X. Li, C. Jin, S. Cao, and K.
Deng, Phys. Rev. B 70, 184424 ͑2004͒.
1
3
22
pressed by 140 K from the reported bulk value. However,
2
3
Yoshida et al. did record a marked increase in the MnBi
spin reorientation temperature with increased pressure. Thus
the origin of the decreased Curie temperature in these mac-
rostructure samples is not yet clear.
2
2
3
H. Yoshida, T. Shima, T. Takahashi, H. Fujimori, S. Abe, T. Kaneko, T.
Kanomata, and T. Suzuki, J. Alloys Compd. 317–318, 297 ͑2001͒.
J. B. Yang, W. B. Yelon, W. J. James, Q. Cai, M. Kornecki, S. Roy, N. Ali,
and P. I’Heritier, J. Phys. D 14, 6509 ͑2002͒.
4
Downloaded 05 Jan 2013 to 139.184.30.132. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions