482
MITCHENKO et al.
–
–
chain termination can be neglected and that the amount
of evolved methyl chloride is relatively large. Note that,
according to mechanism involving reactions (V) and
(VI), methyl chloride is formed in the vicinity of the
electrophilic site, a complex with the coordination
vacancy. This fact can be the reason for the higher
adsorption equilibrium constant of MeCl: due to the
electrostatic interaction, the adsorption heat of methyl
–
*
[PtCl3 ] · I
[PtCl3I]2–.
(X)
The formation of the KI phase in the reaction with
methyl iodide in ethylene is likely explained by the
relaxation of the [η2-(C2H4)PtCl3]– · I– defect in the
reaction
K2[Pt(η2-C2H4)Cl3] · I
KPt(η2-C2H4)Cl3 + KI.
(XI)
*
chloride on the [PtCl3 ] complex bearing a positive
According to numerous published data [27–30],
intramolecular reductive elimination from Pt(IV) com-
plexes occurs through a pentacoordinated intermediate.
Such a pentacoordinated Pt(IV) methyl complex with a
vacancy in the trans position to the methyl group
should form in the reactions under consideration. This
fact most likely explains the instability of the pentaco-
–
charge can evidently be higher than the adsorption heat
on the electroneutral surface regions.
The NMR signals from the methyl complexes with
and without the iodide ligand in the equatorial plane are
detected for methanol extracts of the methyl complex.
Assuming that, at the moment of extraction, the iodide
ligand does not enter the coordination sphere of the
*
ordinated [Pt(CH3)Cl4 ] derivative, unlike the stable
10
[Pt(CH3)Cl4]– complex and excluding a similar sec-
hexacoordinated [Pt(CH3)Cl5]2– complex in the form of
ondary reaction in the solid phase due to the hindered
mobility, we have to assume that the methyl complex
containing the iodide ligand in the equatorial plane is
formed by the three-center mechanism (II) and/or due
to the methylation of the mixed platinum(II) chloride–
iodide complex. According to reactions (V) and (VI),
the solid K2Pt(CH3)Cl5 salt. Additional stabilization of
–
*
[Pt(CH3)Cl4 ] by the crystalline field of the basic struc-
ture can be another reason for the difference between
–
*
the reactivities of [Pt(CH3)Cl4 ] in the K2PtCl4 matrix
and [Pt(CH3)Cl5]2– in the K2Pt(CH3)Cl5 matrix.
–
2–
*
the [PtCl3 ] and [PtCl3I] complexes formed in the
chemical transformation of MeI into MeCl can be
localized only near each other. This fact makes the
methylation of the last particle sterically possible in the
next act of chain propagation. It is likely that the pres-
ence of the iodide ligand in the coordination sphere
enhances the nucleophilicity of the Pt(II) complex,
which additionally favors this reaction.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by INTAS (grant no. 97-
1874).
REFERENCES
1. Zamashchikov, V.V., Rudakov, E.S., Mitchenko, S.A.,
and Litvinenko, S.L., Teor. Eksp. Khim., 1982, vol. 18,
no. 4, p. 510.
2. Zamashchikov, V.V., Litvinenko, S.L., Mitchenko, S.A.,
and Pryadko, O.N., Metalloorg. Khim., 1992, vol. 5,
no. 6, p. 1272.
3. Luinstra, G.A., Wang, L., Stahl, S.S., Labinger, J.A., and
Bercaw, J.E., J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, vol. 504,
p. 75.
4. Litvinenko, S.L., Zamashchikov, V.V., Shologon, V.I.,
and Rozhkova, Z.Z., Metalloorg. Khim., 1989, vol. 2,
no. 3, p. 553.
Mechanism (V)–(VI) also allows us to explain the
effects observed for reaction (IV) in ethylene. If reac-
tion (VII) occurs rather rapidly, it results in the efficient
decay of the coordinatively unsaturated complexes and,
hence, prevents the formation of the mixed chloride–
11
iodide complex in reaction (V). Since Zeise’s salt
anion is still a positively charged structural defect, it
can stabilize the leaving group to form the
[η2-(C2H4)PtCl3]– · I– ion pair and, correspondingly,
electrophilically assist the SN2 methylation of the
[PtCl4]2– anion. The decomposition of the methyl com-
plex formed in reaction (VI) results in the regeneration
of the coordinatively unsaturated Pt(II) complex, which
yields Zeise’s salt anion in reaction (VII). This fact
explains the linear plot of m([η2-(C2H4)PtCl3]–) vs.
m(MeCl) (Fig. 4). The slope of the straight line of this
plot differs from zero and can be a consequence of the
competition of reaction (VII) and reactions (V) and (X)
for the iodide ion entering the coordination sphere of
platinum
5. Zamashchikov, V.V., Rudakov, E.S., Mitchenko, S.A.,
and Pekhtereva, T.M., Koord. Khim., 1985, vol. 11,
no. 1, p. 69.
6. Litvinenko, S.M., Zamashchikov, V.V., and Sho-
logon, V.I., Kinet. Katal., 1987, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 1059.
7. Mitchenko, S.A., Zamashchikov, V.V., Pryadko, O.N.,
andVdovichenko, A.N., Metalloorg. Khim., 1989, vol. 2,
no. 4, p. 741.
8. Zamashchikov, V.V., Rudakov, E.S., Garkusha-
Bozhko, V.S., Mitchenko, S.A., and Litvinenko, S.L.,
Koord. Khim., 1986, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 822.
10
Since no evolution of the spectra in time is observed, this pro-
9. Butyagin, P.Yu., Usp. Khim., 1994, vol. 63, no. 12,
cess occurs either very rapidly or very slowly.
p. 1031.
11
In this case, the formation of the mixed chloride–iodide complex
should be accompanied by the displacement of ethylene from
the coordination sphere, and this contradicts the experiment.
10. Enikolopov, N.S., Usp. Khim., 1991, vol. 60, no. 3,
p. 754.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 43 No. 4 2002