18
E. K A LD iS
low steps which can be still seen in the saddle regions. microscope work has been performed in the Labora-
The high density of these steps could give an explana- torium für Elektronenmikroskopie 11 of the ETH in
tion for the high growth rate.
collaboration with Mr. R. Wersiken. The author wishes
to thank both him and Dr. U. Nissen.
7. Conclusions
M any thanks are due to Dr. W. Beckenbaugh for
—
No evidence of constitutional supercooling in the critically reading the manuscript.
vapour phase has been found both in high temperature
This work was partly supported by the Swiss National
chemical transport and sublimation of EuS in a sealed Fonds.
Mo crucible, although the former shows the highest
References
growth rate which has been observed up to now for
single crystal growth by chemical transport. Kinetic
1) E. Kaldis, J. Crystal Growth 3,4 (1968) 146; 9 (1971) 281.
2) E. Kaldis, Principles of the Vapour Growth of Single
and morphological data indicate that growth kinetics
are probably the rate determining step in the chemical
crystals, in: Crystal Growth, Theory and Techniques’, Ed.
C. H. Goodman (Plenum, New York, 1972).
transport of EuS.
3) E. Kaldis, in: Proc. li/A ll-U nion Conf. of USSR, T zakhka-
zor, September 1972.
—
The vaporisation study of EuS shows that the surface
4) T. B. Reed and W. J. LaFleur, AppI. Phys. Letters, 5 (1964)
reaction is rate determining, the evaporation coefficient
being ~ = 3,3—6.Ox 1 0 2 in the region of 1700—1950
° CThese and morphological observations indicate that
growth kinetics are probably the rate determining step
191.
5) M . Toyama, Japan. J. AppI. Phys. 5(1966)1204.
6) M. M. Faktor, R. Heckingbottom and I. Garrett, J. Chem.
Soc. A (1970) 2657; J. Crystal Growth 9(1971)3, 2.
7) D. W. G. Ballentyne, S. Wetwatana and E. A. D. White,
J. Crystal Growth 7 (1970) 79.
in the sublimation of EuS.
8) T. B. Reed, W. J. LaFleur and A. J. Strauss, J. Crystal
—
In the sublimation of EuS a transition from singular
(100) to non-singular faces has been found at tempera-
tures near the melting point.
Growth 3,4 (1968) 115.
9) H. Schafer, J. Crystal Growth 9(1971)18: Che,nische Tra,is-
porrreokt,onen (Verlag Chemie, 1962).
10) J. H. F. Jeffes, J. Crystal Growth 3,4 (1968) 13.
The vaporisation study of EuS enabled the selection
II) C. F. Goodeve, Discussions Faraday Soc. 4(1948)14.
of optimal conditions for crystal growth by sublimation.
12) E. Kaldis, J. Crystal Growth 5 (1969) 376.
—
The high pressure, high temperature chemical
13) P. Goldfinger and M. Jeunehomme, Trans. Faraday Soc.
59 (1963) 2851.
transport method discussed in this work may open new 14) R. Nitsche and D. Richman, Z. Elektrochem. 66(1962) 709.
possibilities for the crystal growth of high melting
compounds from the vapour phase. Some evidence is
5) W. K. Burton, N. Cabrera and F. C. Frank. Phil Trans. Roy.
Soc. London A243 (1950) (99.
16) J. P. l—lirth and G. NI. Pound, Condensation and Ei’aporation
(Pergamon, London, 1963).
existing that the transporting agent is a ternary corn-
pound of the general formula Eu~M~S0T.he purity of
17) L. Brewer and J. S. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. 59(1955)105.
the EuS crystals grown by this method is remarkable.
18) S. G. Parker and J. E. Pinnell, Trans. Al ME 245 ((969) 451;
J. Crystal Growth 9(1971)177.
Acknowledgements
19) E. Kaldis, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26(1965)1701.
20) W. L. Winterbottom, in: Phiysicocheinical Mea,surenzent.s in
The author is deeply indebted to the director of the
Metals Research, Vol. IV, I, Ed. R. A . Rapp (lnterscience,
New York, 197O)p. 95.
Laboratorium für Festkorperphysik, Prof. Dr. G. 21) E. Kaldis, to be published.
Busch, for his continuous support and encouragement 22) E. Kaldis, L. Krausbauer and R. Widmer, Cd4SiS6 atid
during this work, as well for many fruitful discussions.
The success of this work has been positively influ- 23) H. SchEfer F. Wehmeier and M. Trenkel, J. Less Commoti
Cd4SiSe6 New Ternary Photoconductors and Phosphors,
RCA Laboratories Zurich, Internal Report, 1965.
enced by the skilled experimental collaboration of
Messrs. G. Sampietro, V. Hildebrandt and P. Wilhelm.
Metals 16 (1968) 290.
24) M. Bienfait and R. Kern, Bull. Soc. Franc. Mineral. Crist.
87 (1964) 604.
The author wishes to express his thanks to them. The 25) M . Bienfait,Thèse, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Nancy
author wishes to thank also Prof. P. Wachter for the
966.
optical measurements, Dr. J. Muheim for the mass 26) N. Cabrera, Discussions Faraday Soc. 28(1960) 16.
27) A. Pavlovska and D . N enow , Surface Sci. 27(1971) 211; J.
Crystal G row th 8(1971)209; J. Crystal Growth 12(1972)9.
spectragraphic analysis and Dr. B. Magyar for the
X-ray fluorenscence analysis. The scanning electron- 28) J. M uheim, private com m unication.