C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
1
b). The smaller depletion of the gas phase concentration of the
pressure of the inhibitor B (see Supporting Information). The
experimental growth rate data fit this functional form extremely
well (Figure 2). The value of ꢀ calculated from the growth rate is
given on the right abscissa in Figure 2; it falls from 0.35 to 0.07 as
the dme pressure increases from 0 to 6 × 10 Torr. This reduction
in ꢀ, which is the key effect of the inhibitor, leads to a dramatic
improvement in the conformality of the CVD growth process.
Experimentally, the film growth rate at constant precursor and
inhibitor pressure increases slightly as a function of temperature,
corresponding to an apparent activation energy of 0.67 eV (65 kJ/
mol). This increase could be due to one or both of two effects: an
precursor as a function of depth is the key factor that improves the
conformal coverage. The dme pressure remains relatively unchanged
inside the trench, because it is not consumed in the growth reaction.
In separate experiments, we have shown that dme does in fact
-4
serve as an inhibitor of TiB
2
deposition. At a dme pressure of 6 ×
film growth rate from Ti(BH (dme) at 175
C is reduced by a factor of 5 (Figure 2) without any significant
-
4
1
°
0
Torr, the TiB
2
4 3
)
change in film quality and purity (see Supporting Information).
increase in the reaction constant k
k′des for desorption of the inhibitor, which implies an increase in the
precursor surface coverage θ . We have shown in our earlier work
that the TiB growth rate from the Ti(BH (dme) precursor is very
weakly activated across a wide temperature range (175-600 °C).
r
or an increase in the rate constant
A
2
4 3
)
11
We believe that the increased growth rate at higher temperatures in
the presence of the inhibitor is due to enhanced desorption of the dme.
The apparent activation energy value compares well with the desorption
activation energy of various ethers (0.4-0.6 eV) bound to metal
14
surfaces. At higher growth temperatures, the partial pressure of
inhibitor must be increased in order to maintain the surface coverage
of Bads necessary to reduce the sticking probability of the precursor
and to obtain conformal coverage.
Figure 2. Growth rate (left axis) and sticking probability ꢀ (right axis) of
2 4 3
a TiB film grown at 175 °C from Ti(BH ) (dme) as a function of dme
pressure: experimental (9) and fit to theory (solid line).
In summary, we have demonstrated that the conformality of CVD
films can be increasedswithout changing the temperature or
precursor fluxssimply by adding a second component to the gas
stream that reduces the precursor sticking probability. This approach
should be able to enhance the conformality of many other low-
temperature CVD processes.
At least two different but related mechanisms can be invoked to
explain the reduction in a CVD growth rate upon addition of an
inhibitor to the growth stream: (1) The inhibitor occupies, and
therefore blocks, reactive surface sites, thus reducing the net rate
of precursor adsorption and therefore the film growth rate, or (2)
the inhibitor promotes the reversible desorption of adsorbed
precursor, thus reducing the net rate of precursor adsorption and
therefore the growth rate. The first mechanism is equivalent to
reducing the rate of the forward reaction leading to film growth,
whereas the second mechanism is analogous to Le Chatelier’s
principle, in which the addition of a reaction product increases the
rate of the back reaction. As far as we are aware, there has been
no previous recognition that these mechanisms are potentially
relevant to CVD film growth kinetics, although it is known that
recombinative desorption pathways relevant to CVD deposition
Acknowledgment. The authors thank the National Science
Foundation for support under grants DMR 03-15428 and CHE 07-
5
0422. A.Y.-G. thanks La Fundaci o´ n la Caixa and Ministerio de
Ciencia e Innovaci o´ n for support. Ex-situ materials characterization
was carried out in the Center for Microanalysis of Materials at the
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, University of
Illinois, which is partially supported by the U.S. Department of
Energy under grant DEFG02-07ER46453 and DEFG02-
0
7ER46471.
1
2
processes can take place on surfaces, and that film deposition
from solutes dissolved in supercritical CO can be slowed by
Supporting Information Available: Details of the deposition experi-
ments, derivation of rate law for deposition of film as a function of
precursor and inhibitor pressures, and figure of the temperature dependence
2
1
3
addition of a reaction product.
The inhibition effect can be modeled with the following steps:
i) the precursor AB reversibly chemisorbs on the surface to form
a reactive species Aads and a byproduct Bads; (ii) the adsorbed
reactive species Aads further reacts to afford film M ; and (iii) the
2 4 3
of the TiB growth rate deposited from Ti(BH ) (dme) in the presence of
(
g
-4
3
× 10 Torr of added dme. This material is available free of charge via
the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
s
addition of an inhibitor, in this case identical to the reaction
byproduct B, raises the steady state population of Bads on the surface
References
(1) Granneman, E. H. A. Thin Solid Films 1993, 228, 1–11.
(
2) International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. www.itrs.net, 2007.
(Supporting Information, eq 2-4). We further assume that Aads and
(
(
(
3) Leskela, M.; Ritala, M. Thin Solid Films 2002, 409, 138–146.
4) Lim, B. S.; Rahtu, A.; Gordon, R. G. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 749–754.
5) Yang, Y.; Jayaraman, S.; Kim, D. Y.; Girolami, G. S.; Abelson, J. R. Chem.
Mater. 2006, 18, 5088–5096.
Bads compete for the same surface reactive sites. Note that
mechanism 1 will require a large degree of site blocking whereas
mechanism 2 can take place even if the population of Bads is not
sufficient to block most of the adsorption sites. It is possible that
other intermediate steps can occur, for example, the formation of
a weakly bound (physisorbed) state preceding chemisorption, but
provided that these additional steps are not rate limiting, the
conclusions of the model will be unchanged.
Solving the appropriate rate equations for steady state coverage
of species Aads and Bads under the conditions of our experiment
leads to a solution for the surface coverage of Aads (and therefore
(
6) Gates, S. M. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1519–1532.
(7) Hsieh, J. J. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 1993, 11, 78–86.
(
8) Gil, A.-Y.; Yang, Y.; Kumar, N.; Abelson, J., to be submitted.
9) Jayaraman, S.; Klein, E. J.; Yang, Y.; Kim, D. Y.; Girolami, G. S.; Abelson,
J. R. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 2005, 23, 631–633.
(
(
10) Jensen, J. A.; Gozum, J. E.; Pollina, D. M.; Girolami, G. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 1643–1644.
(11) Kumar, N.; Yang, Y.; Noh, W.; Girolami, G. S.; Abelson, J. R. Chem.
Mater. 2007, 19, 3802–3807.
(
12) Chung, Y. S.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, Y. S.; Kim, S. Surf. Sci. 2001, 482, 312–317.
(13) Zong, Y. F.; Watkins, J. J. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 560–565.
14) Sexton, B. A.; Hughes, A. E. Surf. Sci. 1984, 140, 227–248.
(
the growth rate) of the form C
1
/(1 + C
2
p
B
), where p
B
is the partial
JA807802R
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 130, NO. 52, 2008 17661