Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 4759–4761 4759
DOI: 10.1021/ic100439n
Oxidation of Glutathione by [FeIV(O)(N4Py)]2þ: Characterization of an
[FeIII(SG)(N4Py)]2þ Intermediate
Ashley A. Campanali, Timothy D. Kwiecien, Lew Hryhorczuk, and Jeremy J. Kodanko*
Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202
Received March 5, 2010
The mechanism of glutathione (GSH) oxidation by a nonheme
ferryl species has been investigated. The reaction of [FeIV(O)-
(N4Py)]2þ (1) with GSH in an aqueous solution leads to the rapid
formation of a green intermediate, characterized as the low-spin
ferric complex [FeIII(SG)(N4Py)]2þ (2) by UV-vis and electron
paramagnetic resonance spectroscopies and by high-resolution
time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Intermediate 2 decays to form the
final products [FeII(OH2)(N4Py)]2þ and the disulfide GSSG over
time. The overall reaction was fit to a three-step process involving
rapid quenching of the ferryl by GSH, followed by the formation and
decay of 2, which are both second-order processes.
process of GSH oxidation, and kinetic studies that have
elucidated the overall reaction mechanism. This study has
relevance to biology and the protection of cells by GSH against
damage by ferryl compounds.
Previous studies in our laboratory11 revealed that ferryl 1 is
rapidly quenched by the cysteine derivative Ac-Cys-NHtBu
in1:1 H2O/MeCN, whichleads to theformation ofa disulfide
product. During data collection, the generation of a new
green species with an absorbance maximum at 658 nm was
observed by UV-vis spectroscopy after the disappearance of
1 (λmax=680 nm), which was present for ca. 1 h. However,
only trace amounts of the species were observed, and the
formation suffered from low reproducibility. Because this
absorbance fell within the range of known S f FeIII ligand-
to-metal charge-transfer (LMCT) bands,12,13 we surmised
that the new species was likely a ferric thiolate. Therefore, we
investigated the reactivity of related thiols with ferryl 1 and
quickly settled upon GSH because the generation of an
intermediate green species was highly reproducible and the
reaction could be performed in an aqueous buffer, without
the need for MeCN. Interestingly, many other thiols failed to
form the green species, which may provide evidence for the
structure of the green intermediate (vide infra).
Glutathione (GSH) is a ubiquitous tripeptide involved in
many different aspects of cell growth and regulation (Figure 1).
Arguably, its most important role is as an antioxidant, where it
acts as a key player in defense and survival. GSH protects cells
against oxidative stress by rapidly quenching reactive oxygen
species, including hydroxyl radical and superoxide. This role
is well understood.1 In contrast, the reactivity of GSH with
metal-based oxidants such as ferryls [iron(IV) oxo species],
which are powerful oxidizing agents generated by heme2,3 and
nonheme enzymes,4 has received much less attention.5-7 This is
worth investigating because GSH is thought to be the primary
line of defense against detrimental ferryl species, such as ferryl
myoglobin, in cells.8 In this Communication, we report the
reaction of GSH with a synthetic ferryl [FeIV(O)(N4Py)]2þ
(1).9,10 Included are the characterization of a low-spin ferric
species [FeIII(SG)(N4Py)]2þ (2), which is an intermediate in the
The reaction of ferryl 1 with GSH was investigated in detail.
To generate 1,14,15 [FeII(N4Py)(MeCN)](ClO4)2 (2 mM)16
was dissolved in 100 mM acetate buffer (pH = 6.02) and
treated with 2 equiv of aqueous peracetic acid, which led to the
maximum generation of 1, as judged by UV-vis spectroscopy.
The reaction of 1 (1 mM) with GSH (5 mM) showed the rapid
formation of a green intermediate with λmax=650 nm (<45 s),
clearly distinct from 1 (see Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information), followed by a slower decomposition of the
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jkodanko@
chem.wayne.edu.
(1) Hayes, J. D.; McLellan, L. I. Free Radical Res. 1999, 31, 273–300.
(2) Groves, J. T.; Haushalter, R. C.; Nakamura, M.; Nemo, T. E.; Evans,
B. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2884–2886.
(3) Denisov Ilia, G.; Makris Thomas, M.; Sligar Stephen, G.; Schlichting,
I. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2253–2277.
(4) Krebs, C.; Fujimori, D. G.; Walsh, C. T.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 484–492.
(5) Galaris, D.; Cadenas, E.; Hochstein, P. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1989,
6, 473–478.
(6) Romero, F. J.; Ordonez, I.; Arduini, A.; Cadenas, E. J. Biol. Chem.
1992, 267, 1680–1688.
(7) Puppo, A.; Monny, C.; Davies, M. J. Biochem. J. 1993, 289, 435–438.
(8) D’Agnillo, F.; Alayash, A. I. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 1153–
1164.
(9) Que, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 493–500.
(10) Nam, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 522–531.
(11) Abouelatta, A. I.; Campanali, A. A.; Ekkati, A. R.; Shamoun, M.;
Kalapugama, S.; Kodanko, J. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 7729–7739.
(12) Koch, S.; Tang, S. C.; Holm, R. H.; Frankel, R. B.; Ibers, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 916–918.
(13) Kennepohl, P.; Neese, F.; Schweitzer, D.; Jackson, H. L.; Kovacs, J.
A.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1826–1836.
(14) Kaizer, J.; Klinker, E. J.; Oh, N. Y.; Rohde, J.-U.; Song, W. J.;
€
Stubna, A.; Kim, J.; Munck, E.; Nam, W.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 472–473.
(15) Sastri, C. V.; Seo, M. S.; Park, M. J.; Kim, K. M.; Nam, W. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 1405–1407.
(16) Roelfes, G.; L., M.; Leppard, S. W.; Schudde, E. P.; Hermant, R. M.;
Hage, R.; Wilkinson, E. C.; Que, L., Jr.; Feringa, B. L. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 1997, 117, 223–227.
r
2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/06/2010
pubs.acs.org/IC