ChemComm
Page 4 of 4
in water, and found that the reaction proceeded poorly with very
crystal Xꢀray analysis showed that the cage 1 has a large internal
cavity. Furthermore, the preferential affinity of the cavity towards
aromatic molecules through πꢀπ stacking has been successfully
employed to catalyze the Knoevenagel condensation of a series of
aromatic aldehydes with 1,3ꢀdimethylbarbituric acid /Meldrum’s
acid in green aqueous medium. Construction of water soluble
other polyhedral cages via multiꢀcomponent selfꢀassembly
including their hostꢀguest chemistry and further exploitation in
low yield (~5 %). Even in organic solvents (CHCl , acetone,
3
dichloromethane), only ~3ꢀ4 % of aldehyde transformed to
product after 72 h. We believe that, at first, the aromatic aldehyde
is encapsulated within the hydrophobic cavity of the cage (1) via
πꢀπ stacking interaction between the aromatic walls of the cage
and aromatic backbone of aldehyde to form hostꢀguest complex.
After the reaction, due to the hydrophobicity of the pocket, the
loss of water takes place easily to generate dehydrated product
which is too bulky for encapsulation and readily comes out of the
cage.
Similarly, the condensation of 1ꢀpyrene aldehyde (b) with e,
efficiently elevated to ~33 % within 3 h whereas the reaction is
scarcely occurred without cage (~2 %). We have also performed
the same reaction with individual components [cisꢀ
7
7
8
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
12
catalytic reactions have potential to explore.
1
1
2
2
3
The authors are thankful to the CSIR, New Delhi, India for
financial support. We are thankful to the Johnson Matthey Ltd.
U.K. for loan of PdCl . D. S. is grateful to CSIR, India for SPMꢀ
fellowship. Authors also acknowledge financial assistance
received from STCꢀIISc.
‡ This article is part of the ChemComm ‘Emerging Investigators 2013’
2
(
tmen)Pd(NO ) , tim or timb] and found that reaction progressed
3 2
only up to ~3 % which clearly suggested that the hydrophobic
cavity is crucial for the reaction. Relatively smaller aldehyde, 2ꢀ
naphthaldehyde (c), in general, reacts with active methylene
compound even in aqueous media due to higher reactivity.
However, when we performed the reaction in presence of the
cage, the yield of the condensation product (4 and 5) significantly
increased (Table 1), which demonstrates that the cavity of the
cage plays a vital role in promoting the reaction. In contrast,
benzaldehyde (d) undergoes condensation with e at almost equal
rate corresponding to the reaction without cage (Table 1).
Initially, it was thought that due to higher reactivity of e, cage has
not influenced the yield. To verify this, we replaced e with f,
where f is lesser reactive than e owing to higher pKa and found
that in this case also, cage doesn’t regulate the yield. We also
checked the reaction of aliphatic aldehyde like isobutyraldehyde
with e for 10 h in presence of 1, which showed no rate
enhancement. Such observation demonstrates that the cavity of
the cage 1 is quite selective in promoting the rate of Knoevenagel
condensation of polycyclic aldehydes, which are very less
reactive at ambient condition in aqueous medium without any
catalyst.
themed issue.
Notes and references
1
(a) M. R. Ghadiri, J. R. Granja and L. K. Buehler, Nature, 1994, 369,
3
1
2
01; (b) K. Motesharei and M. R. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
19, 11306; (c) M. Tominaga and M. Fujita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,
007, 80, 1473; (d) M. Engels, D. Bashford and M. R. Ghadiri, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 9151; (e) W. Yuan, T. Friscic, D. Apperley and
S. L. James, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3916; (f) A. Corma,
Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2373; (g) W. Meng, B. Breiner, K. Rissanen, J.
D. Thoburn, J. K. Clegg and J. R. Nitschke, Angew Chem. Int. Ed.,
2
011, 50, 3479; (h) R. Wyler, J. de Mendoza and J. Rebek, Jr., Angew.
Chem. 1993, 105, 1820; (i) W. Meng, B. Breiner, K. Rissanen, J. D.
Thoburn, J. K. Clegg and J. R. Nitschke, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2011,
5
0, 3479; (j) B. Brusilowskij, S. Neubacher and C. A. Schalley, Chem.
Commun. 2009, 45, 785. .
3
4
5
0
2
3
4
R. Fiammengo, M. CregoꢀCalama and D. N. Reinhoudt, Curr Opin
Chem Biol., 2001, 5, 660.
(a) J. ꢀM. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives;
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995.
Table 1. Yields of the Knoevenagel condensations of aromatic aldehydes
and active methylene compounds in presence and absence of cage 1.
(a) R. Chakrabarty, P. S. Mukherjee and P. J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 2011,
1
11, 6810; (b) R. S. Seidal and P. J. Stang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35,
9
72; (c) M. Fujita, D. Oguro, M. Miyazawa, H. Oka, K. Yamaguchi
and K. Ogura, Nature, 1995, 378, 469; (d) P. Mal, B. Breiner, K.
Rissanen and J. R. Nitschke, Science, 2009, 324, 1697.
5
(a) K. Ono, M. Yoshizawa, T. Kato and M. Fujita, Chem. Commun.,
2
2
008, 2328; (b) J. Lee, K. Ghosh and P. J. Stang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
009, 131, 12028; (c) A. K. Bar, G. Mostafa and P. S. Mukherjee,
4
5
5
5
0
5
Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 7647.
D. Samanta, S. Shanmugaraju, S. A. Joshi, Y. P. Patil, M. Nethaji and
P. S. Mukherjee, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2298.
(a)J. Fan, L. Gan, H. Kawaguchi, W. –Y. Sun, K. –B. Yu and W. –X.
Tang, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 3965; (b) A. Rit, T. Pape and F. E. Hahn,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4572; (c) A. Rit, T. Pape, A. Hepp and
F. E. Hahn, Organometallics, 2011, 30, 334.
(a) M. L. Deb and P. J. Bhuyan, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 6453; (b)
U. P. N. Tran, K. K. A. Le and N. T. S. Phan, ACS Catal., 2011, 1,
6
7
8
9
1
2
20; (c) T. Murase, Y. Nishijima and M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
012, 134, 162; (d) S. Neogi, M. K. Sharma and P. K. Bharadwaj, J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2009. 299, 1.
(a) A. K. Bar, S. Mohapatra, E. Zangrando and P. S. Mukherjee,
Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 19, 9571; (b) A. K. Bar, R. Chakrabarty, G.
Mostafa and P. S. Mukherjee, Angew. Chem., Int.Ed., 2008, 47, 8455.
0 D. Samanta, S. Mukherjee, Y. P. Patil and P. S. Mukherjee, Chem.
Eur. J., 2012, 18, 12322.
1(a) A. Natarajan, L. S. Kaanumalle, S. Jockusch, C. L. D. Gibb, B. C.
Gibb, N. J. Turro and V. Ramamurthy, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
4132; (b) B. Breiner, J. K. Clegg and J. R. Nitschke, Chem. Sci., 2011,
2, 51.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated social selfꢀsorting of an
1
1
unprecedented Pd molecular cage (1) via multiꢀcomponent selfꢀ
7
6
0
assembly of triꢀ and tetraꢀimidazole donors without employing
any template. Such interesting social selfꢀsorting was possible
due to having required directions of the donor nitrogens of the
building units. This approach may have wide application in
generating further complex architectures of varied shapes and
sizes using multiple donors with higher denticity. Along with the
structural confirmation through ESIꢀMS and NMR studies, single
1
2(a) M. Yoshizawa, J. K. Klosterman and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 3418; (b) T. S. Koblenz, J. Wassenaar and J. N. H. Reek,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 247.
6
5
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3