Cl
the presence of 1.0 mol % of catalyst prepared in situ from
Rh(COD) BF and 1.1 equiv of PEAPhos 1. The results are
summarized in Table 1. (S ,R )-PEAPhos 1a and 1b with a
2
at room temperature under a H
2
pressure of 10 bar in
hydrogenation product.8,9 Solvent screening indicated that
the solvent had a great effect on the enantioselectivity and
CH Cl proved to be the best solvent in terms of enantiose-
2
4
2
2
4
c
a
lectivity (entries 4-7).
Hydrogenation of a series of substituted R-dehydroamino
acid esters 6b-e was then performed in CH Cl by use of
(S ,S )-PEAPhos 1d. The results revealed that there is no
2
2
Table 1. Rh-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation of
R-Dehydroamino Acid Esters 6a
c
a
major effect on the substitution pattern of R-dehydroamino
acid derivatives, and all of the substrates were hydrogenated
in excellent enantioselectivity with full conversions (entries
8
-11). Thus, all of the tested substrates were hydrogenated
in over 99% ee and the best result was obtained in the
hydrogenation of 2-methoxy-substituted substrate 6d, af-
fording the hydrogenation product in over 99.9% ee (entry
c a
10). To demonstrate the efficiency of the catalyst Rh/(S ,S )-
PEAPhos 1d, the hydrogenation of 6a was also carried out
with the reduced catalyst loadings as low as 0.01 mol %
Rh
ee %b
(config)
entry
ligand
substrate solvent (mol %)
(S/C ) 10 000), affording the corresponding amino acid
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
(Sc,Ra)-1a
(Sc,Ra)-1b
(Sc,Sa)-1c
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
(Sc,Sa)-1d
6a
6a
6a
6a
6a
6a
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6a
6a
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
PhMe
MeOH
EtOAc
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.02
0.01
17.3 (R)
48.5 (R)
98.1 (R)
99.1 (R)
80.1 (R)
93.5 (R)
92.3 (R)
99.6 (R)
99.0 (R)
>99.9 (R)
99.7 (R)
99.0 (R)
98.8 (R)
derivative 7a in full conversions without loss of enantiose-
lectivity (entry 13).
For the hydrogenation of enamide substrates 8, the Rh
catalyst composed of PEAPhos was also particularly effec-
tive, and the results are summarized in Table 2. With the
exception of (S
high enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation of N-(1-phen-
ylethenyl)acetamide 8a. It is very strange that (S ,R )-1a,
c a
,R )-1b, all of the PEAPhos ligands showed
c
a
1
1
1
1
which proved to have unmatched chiral elements and
displayed very low enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation
of R-dehydroamino acid esters, unexpectedly gave a hydro-
c a
genation product in 95.9% ee (entry 1). Again, (S ,S )-1d
a
Reactions were performed in 3 mL of solvent with 0.5 mmol of
exhibited the highest enantioselectivity in up to 99.5% ee
(entry 4). Under the optimized reaction conditions as used
in the hydrogenation of R-dehydroamino acid esters, various
enamide substrates could be hydrogenated with the catalysis
substrates and 1 mol % of catalyst prepared in situ from Rh(COD)2BF4
and 1.1 equiv of PEAPhos 1 at room temperature and a H2 pressure of 10
bar for 12 h. Full conversions were achieved in all reactions. Enantiomeric
excesses were determined by GC, using a CP-Chiralsil-L-Val capillary (0.25
mm × 30 m) column. The absolute configuration was determined by
comparing the GC retention times with GC data in the literature.
b
c a
of Rh/(S ,S )-1d to afford the corresponding R-phenylethyl-
amine derivatives with extremely high enantiomeric excess
values. The substituted group in the phenyl ring of enamide
substrates had little impact on the enantioselectivity of the
reaction, and all of the substituted N-(1-phenylethenyl)-
a
(R )-binaphthyl moiety proved to be inferior ligands and
induced a very low ee (17.3% ee and 48.5% ee, respectively)
in this transformation (entries 1 and 2). In sharp contrast,
c a a
(S ,S )-PEAPhos 1c with a (S )-binaphthyl moiety exhibited
(
8) For review of asymmetric hydrogenation with monophosphoramidite
a significantly high enantioselectivity in 98.1% ee (entry 3).
This result indicated that the absolute configuration of
PEAPhos strongly influenced the enantioselectivity of the
ligands, see: (a) Jerphagnon, T.; Renaud, J.-L.; Bruneau, C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2101. For some recent examples of asymmetric
hydrogenation with monophosphoramidite ligands, see: (b) Peng, H.-Y.;
Lam, C.-K.; Mak, T. C. W.; Cai, Z.; Ma, W.-T.; Li, Y.-X.; Wong, H. N. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9603. (c) Liu, Y.; Ding, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 10488. (d) Hoen, R.; Boogers, J. A. F.; Bernsmann, H.;
Minnaard, A. J.; Meetsma, A.; Tiemersma-Wegman, T. D.; de Vries, J. G.;
Feringa, B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1896. (e) Panella, L.;
Feringa, B. L.; de Vries, J. G.; Minnaard, A. J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4177.
f) Bernsmann, H.; van den Berg, M.; Hoen, R.; Minnaard, A. J.; Mehler,
G.; Reetz, M. T.; de Vries, J. G.; Feringa, B. L. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
43. (g) Zeng, Q.-H.; Hu, X.-P.; Liang, X.-M.; Zheng, Z. Chin. Chem. Lett.
2005, 16, 1321. (h) Zeng, Q.-H.; Hu, X.-P.; Duan, Z.-C.; Liang, X.-M.;
Zheng, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 393.
reaction and the matched stereogenic elements are (S
c
)-central
and (S )-axial chirality. The increase of the steric hindrance
a
at the nitrogen atom of the ligands proved to be favorable
for the enantioselectivity of the reaction. By use of the
N-methylated (S ,S )-PEAPhos 1d, the enantioselectivity was
c a
(
further increased to 99.1% ee (entry 4). Noticeably, all of
the hydrogenation products obtained in the above procedures
had a (R)-configuration no matter the chirality of the
binathphtyl moiety in these PEAPhos ligands, meaning that
the central chirality controls the absolute configuration of
the product. This result is entirely opposite from those
obtained by phosphoramidite-containing ligands in the Rh-
catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation, in which the axial
chirality has the crucial role in determining the chirality of
9
(
9) For the bidentate phosphoramidite-containing ligands, see: (a)
Franci o` , G.; Faraone, F.; Leitner, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
428. (b) Di e´ guez, M.; Ruiz, A.; Claver, C. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2702.
c) Hu, X.-P.; Zheng, Z. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3585. (d) Jia, X.; Li, X.; Lam,
1
(
W. S.; Kok, S. H. L.; Xu, L.; Lu, G.; Yeung, C.-H.; Chan, A. S. C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2273. (e) Burk, S.; Franci o` , G.; Leitner,
W. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3460. (f) Zeng, Q.-H.; Hu, X.-P.; Duan, Z.-C.;
Liang, X.-M.; Zheng, Z. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1233. (g) Hu,
X.-P.; Zheng, Z. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 419.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 19, 2006
4369