Table 2 Epoxidation of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene catalysed by Mn–1 under
chains on the Mn–oxo intermediate responsible for the oxygen
transfer.16,17 Further synthetic efforts are required in order to
improve enantiofacial discrimination, still maintaining the
peculiar solubility of the catalysts in fluorocarbons.
We thank Ausimont S.p.A. (Milano) for a kind gift of
Galden®-D100 and the Progetto Strategico per la Difesa dai
Rischi Chimico-Industriali ed Ecologici, CNR (Rome) for
financial support.
FBS conditionsa
Conver- Yield Ee
sion
Oxidant
Solvent
t/h
0.5
24
10
4
6
6
4
T/°C
(%)b
(%)b
(%)c
d
30% H2O2
PhIO
Bu4NHSO5
MCPBA–NMOe
MCPBA–NMOe
MCPBA–NMOe
MCPBA–NMOe,f
MeCN
MeCN
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
20
20
20
278
250
220
250
—
85
95
10
70
98
90
—
65
89
9
56
86
85
—
6
8
5
7
Notes and References
† E-mail: lupo@iumchz.chimorg.unimi.it
5
71
‡ Selected data for 1: mp 108–109 °C; [a]2D0 2105.2 (c 0.5 in Et2O); dH(300
MHz, CDCl3) 13.45 (br s, 2 H), 8.29 (s, 2 H), 7.65 (d, J 2.1, 2 H), 7.47 (d,
J 2.1, 2 H), 3.48–3.37 (m, 2 H), 2.16–1.68 (m, 8 H); dF(282 MHz, CDCl3)
281.3 (t, J 10, 3 F), 2106.9 (t, J 15, 2 F), 2120.2 (br s, 2 F), 2122.1 (m,
6 F), 2123.2 (br s, 2 F), 2126.6 (br s, 2 F). For Mn–1: [a]2D0 2780 (c 0.01
in CCl2FCF2Cl); lmax(CCl2FCF2Cl)/nm 465, 385, 335. For 2: mp
48–50 °C; [a]2D0 28.8 (c 0.5 in Et2O); dH(CDCl3) 13.24 (br s, 2 H), 8.44 (s,
2 H), 7.65 (d, J 2.1, 2 H), 7.52 (d, J 2.1, 2 H), 7.27–7.05 (m, 10 H), 4.82 (s,
2 H); dF(282 MHz, CDCl3) 281.1 (t, J 10, 3 F), 2106.8 (t, J 14, 2 F),
2120.3 (br s, 2 F), 2121.9 (m, 6 F), 2123.8 (br s, 2 F), 2126.6 (br s, 2 F).
For Mn–2: [a]2D0 +90 (c 0.01 in CCl2FCF2Cl); lmax(CCl2FCF2Cl)/nm 480,
385, 330.
a Conditions: [catalyst] = 0.005 m in D-100; [substrate] = 0.1 m in CH2Cl2;
volume of D-100 = 1 ml; volume of CH2Cl2 = 1 ml; oxidant: 0.2 mmol.
Stirring rate = 1300 rpm. b Determined by capillary GC integration against
an internal standard (dichlorobenzene). c Determined by capillary GC using
d
a Cyclodex-B chiral column.
The catalyst bleached in 30 min.
e
NMO = N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (0.5 mmol). Addition of the
oxidant was carried out according to the procedure described in ref. 13.
f Substrate = indene.
§ The following commercially available perfluorocarbons were tested as
solvents: FC-72 (3M, mainly perfluorohexanes, bp 56 °C), FC-75 (3M,
mainly perfluoro-n-butyltetrahydrofuran, bp 102 °C), D-100 (Ausimont,
mainly n-perfluorooctane, bp 100 °C).
the case of the cobalt complex of a perfluoroalkylated
tetraarylporphyrin, the presence of two distinct phases did not
preclude the oxidation of the substrate dissolved in the organic
solvent.7a Both complexes were found to be active catalysts,
affording epoxides in isolated yields up to 85%. Moreover we
were able to use the catalysts in substantially lower amounts
than those required under homogenous conditions
(catalyst = 1.5% with respect to the alkene, instead of 12%).12
The brown perfluorocarbon layer recovered by simple decanta-
tion could be generally recycled in a second run without
appreciable decrease of activity. Rather surprisingly, only
indene was epoxidized with high enantioselectivity ( > 90%).
All the other alkenes that we tested gave low (15%) or even 0%
ee. The same trend was observed when reactions were carried
out in the presence of other oxygen donors more commonly
used in combination with chiral (salen)Mn. Results are
exemplified in Table 2 for the epoxidation of 1,2-dihydro-
naphthalene and indene catalysed by Mn–1. Epoxidations with
the couple m-chloroperbenzoic acid–N-methylmorpholine
N-oxide (MCPBA–NMO) were very slow at 278 °C, probably
because of hindered mass-transfer between the two liquid
phases. Although still lower than in the case of homogeneous
systems,13 reaction rates in the FBS became reasonable at
250 °C. Catalyst Mn–2 gave lower ee (58%) and conversion
(50%) with respect to Mn–1 in the MCPBA–NMO epoxidation
of indene. In the case of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene ee was
improved (15 vs. 7%), but conversion of the substrate was not
satisfactory (45% after 5 h).
Despite the low enantioselectivities generally observed with
our prototype catalysts, the FBS approach described here offers
distinct advantages over other reported methods of immobiliza-
tion of salen complexes. Note that in just one case the reported
activities, chemoselectivities and ees of heterogenized
Jacobsen–Katsuki catalysts were as high as those obtained with
one of the best homogeneous chiral (salen)Mn complexes.14
Stability of the catalyst immobilized in the fluorocarbon layer
toward bleaching is increased and its activity remains high. The
easy separation of the products from the catalyst which can be
readily reused is another considerable benefit that was not
given, for instance, by embedding salen complexes into the
pores of zeolites.15 The present results show that an improve-
ment in enantioselectivity does not necessarily follow from the
use of FBS versions of chiral catalysts. In this context, the
behaviour of Mn–1 and Mn–2 is coherent with a strong
electron-withdrawing effect exerted by the four perfluoroalkyl
1 Early work in this field; M. Vogt, Ph.D. Thesis, Rheinisch-
Westfa¨lischen Technischen Hochschule, Aachen, Germany, 1991;
D.-W. Zhu, Synthesis, 1993, 953; I. T. Horva´th and J. Ra´bai, (Exxon
Comp.), US Pat. 5 463 082, 1995.
2 I. T. Horva´th and J. Ra´bai, Science, 1994, 266, 72.
3 D. P. Curran, Chemtracts: Org. Chem., 1996, 9, 75; B. Cornils, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2057.
4 A. Gladysz, Science, 1994, 266, 55; J. J. J. Juliette, I. T. Horva´th and
J. A. Gladysz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1610.
5 E. G. Samsel, K. Srinivasan and J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985,
107, 7606.
6 E. N. Jacobsen, Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, ed. I. Ojima, VCH,
Weinheim, 1993, p. 159; T. Katsuki, J. Mol. Cat., 1996, 113, 87 and
references cited therein.
7 (a) G. Pozzi, F. Montanari and S. Quici, Chem. Commun., 1997, 69; (b)
G. Pozzi, M. Cavazzini, S. Quici and S. Fontana, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1997, 38, 7605.
8 (a) S. G. DiMagno, P. H. Dussault and J. A. Schultz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 5312; (b) I. Klement, H. Lu¨tjens and P. Knochel, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1454; (c) J.-M. Vincent, A. Rabion,
V. K. Yachandra and R. H. Fish, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36,
2346.
9 V. C. R. McLoughlin and J. Thrower, Tetrahedron, 1969, 25, 5921;
G. Pozzi, I. Colombani, M. Miglioli, F. Montanari and S. Quici,
Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 6145.
10 A. Ogawa and D. P. Curran, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 450.
11 P. L. Anelli, F. Montanari and S. Quici, Org. Synth., 1993, Coll. Vol.
VIII, 367.
12 T. Yamada, K. Imagawa, T. Nagata and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett.,
1992, 2231; K. Imagawa, T. Nagata, T. Yamada and T. Mukaiyama,
Chem. Lett., 1994, 527.
13 M. Palucki, G. J. McCormick and E. N. Jacobsen, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 5457.
14 I. F. J. Vankelecom, D. Tas, R. F. Parton, V. Van de Vyver and
P. A. Jacobs, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1346.
15 S. B. Ogunwumi and T. Bein, Chem. Commun., 1997, 901; M. J.
Sabater, A. Corma, A. Domenech, V. Forne´s and H. Garc`ıa, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 1285; L. Frunza, H. Kosslick, H. Landmesser, E. Ho¨ft
and R. Friecke, J. Mol. Catal., 1997, 123, 179.
16 A. Robert, A. Tsapara and B. Meunier, J. Mol. Catal., 1993, 85, 13;
P. J. Pospisil, D. H. Carsten and E. N. Jacobsen, Chem. Eur. J., 1996, 2,
974.
17 M.-A. Guillevic, A. M. Arif, I. T. Horva´th and J. A. Gladysz, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1612.
Received in Liverpool, UK, 20th January 1998; 8/00558C
878
Chem. Commun., 1998