C. N. Kato et al.
FULL PAPER
and placed in a refrigerator to yield a purple-black precipitate,
which was collected on a membrane filter (JG, 0.2 µm), and washed
with ethanol (3ϫ20 mL) and ether (3ϫ20 mL). Yield: 6.38 g
(89.7%). For K14[O{ReV(OH)(α2-P2W17O61)}2]·6H2O, H14K14O131-
P4Re2W34 (9404.277): calcd. H 0.15, Cl 0, K 5.82, P 1.32, Re 3.96;
found H 0.13, ClϽ0.1, K 5.91, P 1.24, Re 3.93. A weight loss of
2.8% (from K-1) was observed during the course of drying at room
temperature at 10–3–10–4 Torr overnight before analysis, suggesting
the presence of 15–16 weakly solvated or adsorbed water molecules.
TG/DTA data: a weight loss of 3.93% was observed below 500 °C;
calcd. 3.91% for x = 21 in K14[O{ReV(OH)(α2-P2W17O61)}2]·xH2O.
dried in the oven (at 50 °C) overnight (TiO2–N+ was obtained).
TiO2–N+ [1.5 g, 31.7 µmol of ϵSi(CH2)3N(CH3)3Cl groups per g]
was suspended in water (45 mL) for 10 min at 25 °C. Solid K-1
(1.0 g, 0.10 mmol) was added to this suspension. The resulting mix-
ture was stirred at 25 °C overnight. The solid product was collected
on a membrane filter (JG, 0.2 µm), washed with water (25 mLϫ3),
and then dried in the oven (at 50 °C) overnight. [Note: if the 1-
grafted TiO2 sample was contaminated by K-1 after the washing
with water, the catalytic activity decreased.] Yield: 1.38 g. For
[(TiO2)5500][Si(CH2)3N(CH3)3]4Cl]7[Si(CH2)3N(CH3)3]7(K7[O{ReV-
(OH)(α2-P2W17O61)}2])·(H2O)200 (2.2 µmol of 1 per g): calcd. C
IR (KBr): ν = 1091, 1018, 954, 907, 787, 527 cm–1. 31P NMR (in 0.22, H 0.14, K 0.06, Re 0.08, Si 0.09, Ti 58.00, found C 0.41, H
˜
D2O, at 25 °C, referenced to 25% H3PO4): δ = –12.38, –13.39 ppm.
31P NMR (in D2O, at 25 °C, referenced to 85% H3PO4): δ = –12.06,
–13.05 ppm. UV/Vis (water): λ (ε, Lmol–1 cm–1) = 254 (9.39ϫ104),
298 (6.28ϫ104), 496 (6.61ϫ103), 737 (4.02ϫ103) nm. ESR
(20 °C): silent.
0.20, K 0.032, Re 0.025, Si 0.16, Ti 58.2. DR UV/Vis spectrum in
the visible region: 496, 751 nm. BET surface area: 39.4 m2 g–1.
Catalytic Reaction Experiments: H2 evolution from water vapor
was carried out at 25 °C. A catalyst (500 mg) was placed into a
glass reaction vessel, which was connected to a conventional Pyrex
closed gas circulation system (238.8 cm3). Water vapor (20 Torr;
257.3 µmol) was introduced after evacuation at 25 °C, followed by
irradiation with a 500-W Xe lamp equipped with a cut-off filter
(λϾ400 nm and λϾ420 nm). H2, O2, CO, and CH4 were analyzed
by GC (TCD, Molecular Sieve 5A stainless steel columns), and
water and CO2 were analyzed by GC (TCD, Porapak Q stainless
steel columns), and assignments were made after comparing these
with the authentic samples analyzed under the same conditions.
D2, H2, and HD were detected with a quadruple mass spectrometer
(Pheiffer Vacuum Prisma QME200). The AQY, defined by the fol-
lowing equation, was measured by using combined band-pass and
cut-off (Kenko) filters and a photodiode (PM3; COHERENT).
AQY = (number of reacted electrons)/(number of incident pho-
tons)ϫ100 = (number of evolved H2 moleculesϫ2)/(number of in-
cident photons)ϫ100.[25]
Crystallization of K-1: The sample (1.0 g) was dissolved in aqueous
HCl solution (pH = 1.5; 3 mL) at Ͼ90 °C, and the purple-black
crystals were obtained by slow evaporation at 25 °C in the dark for
6 d. 31P NMR (D2O, 25 °C): δ = –12.46, –13.45 ppm. For
K14[O{ReV(OH)(α2-P2W17O61)}2]·6H2O,
H14K14O131P4Re2W34
(9404.277): calcd. H 0.15, Cl 0, K 5.82, P 1.32, Re 3.96; found H
0.17, ClϽ0.1, K 6.19, P 1.28, Re 4.00.
X-ray Crystallography: Crystals of compound K-1 were surrounded
by liquid paraffin to prevent their degradation. The crystal size
was 0.13ϫ0.06ϫ0.01 mm. Data collection was carried out with a
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer at 90 K. The intensity
data were automatically corrected for the Lorentz and polarization
effects during integration. The structure was determined by direct
methods (SHELXS-97),[21] followed by the subsequent difference
Fourier calculation, and refined by the full-matrix least-squares
procedure (SHELXL-97).[22] Absorption correction was performed
with SADABS (empirical absorption correction).[23] For complex
1, 34 tungsten atoms, two rhenium atoms, and four phosphorus
atoms were clearly identified. Thus, the main feature of the molecu-
lar structure of the polyoxometalate was clarified. However, the
resolution obtained for the structure of the salt was limited by the
poor quality of the available crystals and by the considerable disor-
der of the countercations and the solvent of crystallization. These
features are common in polyoxometalate crystallography.[24]
Supporting Information (see also the footnote on the first page of
this article): bond lengths, bond angles, and bond valence sums for
compound K-1 (Tables S1 and S2).
Acknowledgments
C. N. K. is grateful for the support of the IZUMI Science and
Technology Foundation, and the Grant-in Aid for Young Scientists
(B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan. K. N. acknowledges the support of the Grant-
in Aid for Scientific Research (C) No. 18550062 and a High-tech
Research Center Project, both from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. W. M. acknowl-
edges the support of a High-tech Research Center Project from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology,
Japan. The research was partially carried out by using an instru-
ment at the Center for Instrumental Analysis of Shizuoka Univer-
sity. We thank Prof. S. Naito (Kanagawa Univ.) and Dr. T. Miyao
(Kanagawa Univ.) for the detection of the D2 produced from D2O
vapor.
¯
Crystal Data for K-1: Triclinic space group P1, purple-black granu-
lar crystals, a = 12.663(5) Å, b = 12.824(5) Å, c = 25.348(9) Å, α =
92.348(7)°, β = 103.666(7)°, γ = 114.919(6)°, and Z = 1. The data
were collected with a Bruker SMART APEX CCD sealed-tube dif-
fractometer with Mo-Kα (0.71073 Å) radiation [temperature =
90(2) K] in the range 0.84 Ͻ θ Ͻ 28.41°. The final cycle of refine-
ment, including the atomic coordinates, anisotropic thermal pa-
rameters (all W, Re, P, K atoms), and isotropic thermal parameters
(all O atoms) converged at R1 = 7.23% and wR2 = 15.87% (Fo Ͼ
2σFo). Further details of the crystal structure investigation may
be obtained from the Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344
Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany [Fax: +49-7247-808-666], e-
mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de, on quoting the depository number
CSD-416410 for K-1.
[1] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 1972, 238, 37–38.
[2] S. U. M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, W. B. Ingler Jr., Science 2002,
297, 2243–2245.
[3] M. Matsuoka, M. Kitano, M. Takeuchi, M. Anpo, J. M.
Thomas, Top. Catal. 2005, 35, 305–310.
[4] Z. Zou, H. Arakawa, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2003,
158, 145–162.
[5] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 13406–13413.
1-Grafted TiO2: TiO2 (anatase, 40 m2 g–1) was pretreated by being
dried in the oven (at 50 °C) overnight. The dried TiO2 support
(2.0 g) was dispersed in methanol (160 mL) at 25 °C. A 50% meth-
anol solution of (MeO)3Si(CH2)3N(CH3)3Cl (556 µL; 1.0 mmol)
was added to this. This mixture was heated at reflux for 6 h at
85 °C. The obtained white powder was collected on a membrane
filter (JG, 0.2 µm), washed with methanol (25 mLϫ3), and then
3140
www.eurjic.org
© 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 3134–3141