146
T. Hisatomi et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 486 (2010) 144–146
tions proceed after a sequence of photoexcitation and charge
dark
migration in photocatalytic water splitting. Under relatively weak
irradiation using a Xe lamp, the reaction rates were significantly
limited by the frequency of photon absorption by photocatalyst
particles rather than rates of surface redox reactions. Rh2ÀyCryO3
cocatalyst, with its smaller apparent activation energy, had higher
photocatalytic activity than Ni in addition to having a negligible
isotope effect. This suggests that electron injection from the photo-
catalyst to the cocatalyst was responsible for the water splitting
rates and apparent activation energies of the present photocata-
lysts. In fact, there exists a potential barrier for electron injection
to a cocatalyst at the interface of an n-type semiconductive photo-
electrode and a deposited cocatalyst [13], while the observed acti-
vation energies did not directly represent the activation barrier for
electron injection, because they were subject to the influence of
light absorption and carrier migration inside the photocatalyst
bulk.
301 K
324 K
345 K
150
100
50
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
4. Conclusion
Reaction time / hour
The weak hydrogen–deuterium isotope effect and small appar-
ent activation energy for photocatalytic overall water splitting on
Rh2ÀyCryO3/Zn:Ga2O3 resulted from a limited number of photoex-
cited carriers participating in surface redox reactions. Although
Rh2ÀyCryO3/Zn:Ga2O3 had an excellent water splitting rate, the
majority of photoexcited carriers recombined before migrating to
active surface sites where they could contribute to the water split-
ting reaction. The isotopic and kinetic approach successfully dem-
onstrates that the enhancement of bulk processes, such as carrier
migration to the photocatalyst surface, electron injection to cocat-
alyst particles, and carrier lifetime, rather than the improvement of
surface redox reactions, can improve the photocatalytic activity of
Rh2ÀyCryO3/Zn:Ga2O3. The method and concept presented in this
study will be applicable to other photocatalysts and provide useful
information on relative rates of bulk processes and surface
reactions.
Fig. 2. Time course of photocatalytic water splitting rate on Zn-added Ga2O3 loaded
with Rh2ÀyCryO3 (Rh 0.5 wt.%–Cr 0.75 wt.%) at various temperatures. Circles and
triangles indicate H2 and O2, respectively. Reaction conditions: catalyst, 0.40 g;
distilled water, 140 mL; light source, 300 W Xe lamp (200 nm < k < 500 nm).
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
n
3.5
3.0
2.5
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research and Development in a
New Interdisciplinary Field Based on Nanotechnology and Materi-
als Science Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT), the Global Centre of
Excellence (GCOE) Program for Chemistry Innovation, and the To-
kyo Metropolitan Collaboration of Regional Entities for the
Advancement of Technological Excellence, Japan Science and Tech-
nology Agency (JST).
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
1000 T -1/ K-1
Fig. 3. Temperature dependences of photocatalytic water splitting rate on Zn-
added Ga2O3 loaded with Rh2ÀyCryO3 (Rh 0.5 wt.%–Cr 0.75 wt.%, open symbols) or
Ni (1 wt.%, closed symbols). Circles and triangles indicate H2 and O2, respectively.
Reaction conditions: catalyst, 0.40 g; distilled water, 140 mL; light source, 300 W Xe
lamp (200 nm < k < 500 nm).
References
[1] K. Maeda, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 7851.
[2] A. Kudo, Y. Miseki, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 253.
[3] Y. Inoue, Energy Environ. Sci. 2 (2009) 364.
[4] R. Baba, S. Nakabayashi, A. Fujishima, K. Honda, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 1902.
[5] F.H. Hussein, R. Rudham, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 (80) (1984) 2817.
[6] T. Hisatomi, K. Maeda, K. Takanabe, J. Kubota, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. C 113
(2009) 21458.
[7] T. Yanagida, Y. Sakata, H. Imamura, Chem. Lett. 33 (2004) 726.
[8] Y. Sakata, Y. Matsuda, T. Yanagida, K. Hirata, H. Imamura, K. Teramura, Catal.
Lett. 125 (2008) 22.
[9] Y. Matsuda, T. Yanagida, Y. Sakata, H. Imamura, K. Teramura, in: 14th
International Congress on Catalysis, Seoul, Korea, July 2008 (Abstract PIII-65-
37).
[10] K. Maeda, K. Teramura, D. Lu, T. Takata, N. Saito, Y. Inoue, K. Domen, J. Phys.
Chem. B 110 (2006) 13753.
[11] A.N. Correia, S.A.S. Machado, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998) 367.
[12] P.K. Wrona, A. Lasia, M. Lessard, H. Ménard, Electrochim. Acta 37 (1992) 1283.
[13] M. Yoshida, A. Yamakata, K. Takanabe, J. Kubota, M. Osawa, K. Domen, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 13218.
deactivation. There was no significant difference in X-ray diffrac-
tion patterns or UV–Visible diffuse reflectance spectra of the phot-
ocatalysts before and after the reaction. These results demonstrate
the excellent durability of the photocatalyst.
Fig. 3 shows Arrhenius plots for the photocatalytic water
splitting reaction on Zn:Ga2O3 modified with Rh2ÀyCryO3 (Rh
0.5 wt.%–Cr 0.75 wt.%) or Ni (1 wt.%). The water splitting rates
monotonically increased with increasing reaction temperature in
the range from 278 to 323 K. The apparent activation energies for
the photocatalytic reaction were 8 or 15 kJ molÀ1 for photocata-
lysts loaded with Rh2ÀyCryO3 or Ni, respectively. These were com-
parable to the apparent activation energies of some photocatalytic
reactions [5,6], but were considerably smaller than those of elec-
trochemical H2 evolution on metal electrodes (31 kJ molÀ1 for Rh
and 56 kJ molÀ1 for Ni) [11,12]. This is because surface redox reac-