48
C. Duanmu et al. / Catalysis Communications 48 (2014) 45–49
Table 3
Nano-TPP–Rh complex recycle and catalytic performance of hydroformylation.
Entry
Round #
Yielda (%)
n/ia
TPP content
μmol/mg)
TON
Rh Content in SPIONsb
(μmol/mg)
Rh left in reaction liquidc
(μmol)
(
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1d
2
1
2
3
4
5
20
98.9
n/a
0.41
n/a
0.093
0.093
0.214
0.214
n/a
e
94.3 (91.4)
94.9 (90.7)
77.3 (70.2)
76.3 (68.5)
43.7
0.54
0.55
0.45
0.61
0.63
0.61
7.23
0.09
n/af
13,261
12,766
13,201
12,213
0.026
0.022
0.021
0.013
0.21
g
40.1
0.186
a
Yield and n/i ratio were determined by the GC method.
Rh content in dry nano-TPP–Rh complex was determined before the hydroformylation reaction by ICP-OES method.
The total amount of Rh left in the reaction liquid after reaction and removal of nano-TPP–Rh complexes by a magnet.
b
c
d
Each round of hydroformylation was run under the same condition: 10.9 mmol styrene, 30 mg nano-TPP (in 3 mL THF), 1.8 mg Rh(OAc)
2
(added every 5 rounds of reactions), syngas
pressure 3 MPa, 12 mL THF, oil bath temperature 90 °C, reaction time 9 h.
e
The numbers in parentheses were isolation yields obtained via flash column chromatography.
The Rh content in reaction liquid was too low to be measured by the ICP-OES method.
f
g
2
1.8 mg Rh(OAc) was compensated every 5 rounds of hydroformylation.
show any catalytic activity in the next round of hydroformylation with-
out the compensation of RhCl (Table 2, entry 2), indicating no enough
7). In our tests, the aldehyde yield of styrene was still 43.7% after four
recycles of nano-TPP–Rh catalytic complexes (Table 3, entry 7). Consid-
ering the almost unchanged TPP contents in the recycled nano-TPP–Rh
complexes, the loss of their catalytic activity was mainly attributed to
the decomposition of nano-TPP–Rh complexes causing the leaching of
Rh atoms from SPION surfaces, which was also confirmed by the Rh
content measurements (Table 3, entries 3 to 7). With the compensation
of Rh salt (one time per five reaction cycles), nano-TPP could be
reactivated and used for 20 reaction cycles (Table 3, entry 8). The n/i
ratios in this recyclable catalysis system were only around 0.5 lower
than industrialized catalytic systems [21], which may be due to the
nano-surface environment on SPIONs, because the iso-aldehyde
preference was also found in other Rh-catalyzed hydroformylations
in nano-environmental catalytic systems [22,23].
3
active dopamine-triphenylphosphine–Rh complexes left on SPIONs
after the high-temperature reaction. It maybe caused by the drop-off
of D-TPP from the SPION surface, which was supported by the elemental
analysis result. After the reaction the nitrogen content in the recycled
SPIONs became undetectable. Thus, lower temperatures (120 °C and
9
0 °C) were selected in the following hydroformylation tests. The reac-
tion rate slowed down significantly at 120 °C and even stopped at 90 °C
in the first round of reaction (Table 2, entries 3 and 4), which may be
due to the poor solubility of RhCl
3
in THF at lower temperature.
Rh(OAc) was then tried as a catalyst precursor because of its better
2
solubility in THF and the hydroformylation reaction could be finished
in 20 h at 90 °C (Table 2, entry 5). When the initial syngas pressure
was lifted to 3.0 MPa (CO and H
much faster and finished in 9 h (Table 2, entry 6).
During the hydroformylation, Rh(OAc) and surface TPP ligands
could form catalytic complexes (nano-TPP–Rh complexes) on the
SPION surfaces, which exhibited much higher catalytic activity than
2
, 1:1), the reaction was accelerated
The recyclability to Rh atoms was greatly affected by the D-TPP
concentration on the SPION surface. Too low D-TPP concentration
(0.093 μmol/mg, Table 3, entries 1 and 2) caused no detectable Rh
atoms left in collected SPIONs after hydroformylation, which suggested
that the Rh atom did not form a stable enough bond with single D-TPP
ligand to be kept on the SPION surface. This concentration dependent
recyclability of nano-TPP–Rh complexes indicated that the two
neighbor D-TPP units cooperated with each other to bond to one
Rh atom simultaneously to form a stable complex as chelation bond-
ing (Scheme 2) [24]. This interesting type of cooperation between
surface ligands on nanoparticles was also found in our previous
research [18]. To improve the nano-TPP–Rh recyclability, further
2
2
Rh(OAc) (Table 2, entries 6 and 7). The in situ formed nano-TPP–Rh
complexes were magnetically collectable with SPIONs together from
the reaction mixture (Fig. 1c) and could keep their high catalytic activity
indicating the formation of stable binding between TPP ligands and Rh
atoms. The TON of the recycled nano-TPP–Rh complex was higher
than 13,000 in the 2nd round of hydroformylation reaction and did
not drop down much in the following recycles (Table 3, entries 4 to
Table 4
a
Scope and limitation of nano-TPP–Rh catalyzed hydroformylations.
Entry
Olefin
Product
Yieldb (%)
n/i ratiob
n-Aldehyde
i-Aldehyde
1
2
95.8
94.2
0.90
1.00
1.45
3
4
77.4
No reaction
No reaction
5
a
2
Each reaction was run under the same condition: 10.9 mmol olefin, 30 mg nano-TPP (in 3 mL THF), 1.8 mg Rh(OAc) (added in 1st catalytic run), syngas pressure 3 MPa, 12 mL THF, oil
bath temperature 90 °C, reaction time 9 h.
b
The yield and n/i ratio were obtained from the 2nd catalytic run by the GC method.