Assessment method
the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU; project AZ13145)
is gratefully acknowledged.
Economic and ecological process efficiencies were assessed by
means of a method designed for utilization at early development
stages of fine chemical processes.
8,16,20,21
References
Mass-balances were
generated on the basis of process flow-sheets created with the
simulation tool, SuperPro Designer version 6.0 (Intelligen, Inc.,
Scotch Plains, NY, United States).
1
2
3
A. J. J. Straathof, S. Panke and A. Schmid, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,
2002, 13, 548–556.
A. Schmid, J. S. Dordick, B. Hauer, A. Kiener, M. Wubbolts and B.
Witholt, Nature, 2001, 409, 258–268.
A. Bull, R. Kurane and B. Marrs, Biotechnology for clean industrial
products and processes – Towards industrial sustainability, Organisa-
tion for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris,
France, 1998, p. 194.
A. Kiener, Chem. Tech., 1995, 25, 31–35.
C. Dingler, W. Ladner, G. A. Krei, B. Cooper and B. Hauer, Pestic.
Sci., 1996, 46, 33–35.
B. B u¨ hler and A. Schmid, J. Biotechnol., 2004, 113, 183–210.
J. B. van Beilen, W. A. Duetz, A. Schmid and B. Witholt, Trends
Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 170–177.
E. Heinzle, A. Biwer and C. L. Cooney, Development of sustainable
bioprocesses: Modeling and assessment, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
Chichester, United Kingdom, 2007.
For the calculation of the environmental indices, all sub-
stances are characterized in different categories according to
their impact on human health and on the environment. These
categories are land use, raw material availability, complexity of
synthesis, thermal risk, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, biological
risk, ecotoxicity, global warming potential, ozone depletion
potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, odor, and
eutrophication potential. For each category, the substances
are classified in three rating levels (ABC analysis), where “A”
stands for high, “B” for medium and “C” for low risk in the
respective category. The criteria for the classification have been
4
5
6
7
8
9
E. Heinzle and K. Hungerb u¨ hler, Chimia, 1997, 51, 176–183.
19
published elsewhere. Weighing factors are used to account for
the differing significance of the impact categories, allowing the
calculation of an environmental index for the input and the
output materials. The total environmental index of a process
is obtained by balancing the input and the output indices in a
1
0 R. G. Mathys, A. Schmid and B. Witholt, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1999,
64, 459–477.
11 A. P. Borole and B. H. Davison, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2007,
37–140, 437–449.
2 M. Eissen, G. Geisler, B. B u¨ hler, C. Fischer, K. Hungerb u¨ hler,
A. Schmid and E. M. Carreira, in Green chemistry metrics –
Measuring and monitoring sustainable processes, ed. A. Lapkin and
D. J. C. Constable, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Chichester, United
Kingdom, 2008, pp. 200–227.
1
1
40 : 60 ratio.
SuperPro Designer comprises comprehensive databases for
the calculation of numerous economic parameters. These values
were used for the economic assessment unless otherwise stated.
Purchase prices for the equipment were taken from the SuperPro
Designer database. The direct investment costs are the sum of the
equipment purchase costs (PC) and charges for the installation
1
3 S. Hellweg, U. Fischer, M. Scheringer and K. Hungerb u¨ hler, Green
Chem., 2004, 6, 418–427.
14 R. A. Sheldon, Chem. Tech., 1994, 24, 38–47.
1
5 P. Saling, A. Kicherer, B. Dittrich-Kr a¨ mer, R. Wittlinger, W. Zombik,
I. Schmidt, W. Schrott and S. Schmidt, Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7, 203–218.
6 E. Heinzle, D. Weirich, F. Brogli, V. H. Hoffmann, G. Koller, M. A.
Verduyn and K. Hungerb u¨ hler, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37, 3395–
1
(
40% of PC), the instrumentation (15% of PC), piping (46% of
3
407.
PC), electronic facilities (10% of PC), buildings (16% of PC),
yard improvements (14% of PC), and service facilities 60% of
1
1
7 A. D. Curzons, D. J. C. Constable, D. N. Mortimer and V. L.
Cunningham, Green Chem., 2001, 3, 1–6.
8 M. Eissen and J. O. Metzger, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3580–3585.
19 E. Heinzle, A. Biwer, M. Eissen and M. A. Kholiq, Chem. Ing. Tech.,
006, 78, 301–305.
0 A. Biwer and E. Heinzle, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2004, 79,
97–609.
21 G. Koller, D. Weirich, F. Brogli, E. Heinzle, V. H. Hoffmann, M. A.
u¨ hler, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37, 3408–
73
PC) as suggested by Roffler et al. Additionally, indirect costs
such as expenses for engineering and the contractor’s fee (16%
of direct costs) and construction (10% of direct costs) have to be
taken into account for the total capital investment. Raw material
costs were complemented with industrial market prices from the
ICIS webpage (www.ICIS.com) or, if necessary, by divison of the
lab-scale prices from Sigma Aldrich (www.sigmaaldrich.com)
by a factor of 10. The depreciation period was assumed to be
2
2
5
Verduyn and K. Hungerb
413.
3
2
2 S. Panke, B. Witholt, A. Schmid and M. G. Wubbolts, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 1998, 64, 2032–2043.
1
0 years with a salvage value of 5%. Insurance and local taxes
23 A. Schmid, K. Hofstetter, H. J. Feiten, F. Hollmann and B. Witholt,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2001, 343, 732–737.
were estimated to account for 1% and 2% of the investment
2
2
4 P. Besse and H. Veschambre, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 8885–8927.
5 A. Archelas and R. Furstoss, Top. Curr. Chem., 1999, 200, 159–191.
26 A. V. R. Rao, M. K. Gurjar and V. Kaiwar, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
costs, respectively, whereas the factory expenses were fixed to
1
$
300 000 a- in all processes. For the maintenance costs, unit-
specific default values of SuperPro Designer were used. Basic
labor costs (BLC) are estimated from the labor requirements of
each operational step in the factory and assuming a standard
wage of $30 h- for an operator. The total labor expenses
additionally include charges for fringe benefits (40% of BLC),
supervision (20% of BLC), operational supplies (10% of BLC),
and administration (60% of BLC). Laboratory costs for quality
checks were 15% of the total labor costs.
1992, 3, 859–862.
2
2
7 A. Datla, P. A. Walavalker, A. Konda and S. B. Trivikram, WO Pat.
007/135463, 2007.
8 M. Couturier, J. L. Tucker, B. M. Andresen, K. M. DeVries, B. C.
2
1
Vanderplas and F. Ito, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2003, 14, 3517–
3
523.
2
9 C. Franchini, A. Carocci, A. Catalano, M. M. Cavalluzzi, F. Corbo,
G. Lentini, A. Scilimati, P. Tortorella, D. C. Camerino and A. de
Luca, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 5238–5248.
30 D. Meyer, B. B u¨ hler and A. Schmid, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 2006, 59,
3–91.
5
3
3
3
1 S. Panke, M. G. Wubbolts, A. Schmid and B. Witholt, Biotechnol.
Bioeng., 2000, 69, 91–100.
Acknowledgements
2 S. Panke, J. M. Sanchez-Romero and V. de Lorenzo, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 1998, 64, 748–751.
3 J. B. Park, B. B u¨ hler, T. Habicher, B. Hauer, S. Panke, B. Witholt and
A. Schmid, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2006, 95, 501–512.
We thank Jin Byung Park for sharing his excellent experience in
cultivation and valuable discussions. The financial support from
8
26 | Green Chem., 2010, 12, 815–827
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010