1684
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 79, No. 11, 10 September 2001
Jang et al.
CNT emitter.14–17 Note that the film-type CNT emitters show
 of 1000–10 000 regardless of the fact that single walled or
multiwalled CNTs are mostly lower than 8000.15–17,21 This
also confirms that the carbon nanotips developed in this work
are better than CNTs as field emitters.
Figure 5 shows a light emission pattern using the carbon
nanotips at a field of 2.3 V/m. The gap between the cathode
and the anode was 1 mm and was maintained by glass spac-
ers. ITO glass with a printed ZnO:Mn blue phosphor was
used as an anode plate. Uniform bright light emission can be
seen. The adhesion of nanotips to the substrate is very firm
so they could not be peeled off even by scratching.
In summary, we have developed carbon nanotips on Si
with a diameter of less than 10 nm. Ni silicide formation has
an important role in allowing the growth of carbon nanotips.
The carbon nanotips show good adhesion to the substrate and
good field emission properties because they formed on a
graphene sheet grown on Ni silicide with an amorphous car-
bon buffer layer between the graphite and Ni silicide. The
carbon nanotips exhibited a turn-on field of 0.1 V/m, a field
amplification factor of 13 000 and uniform light emission
from a phosphor screen. These nanotips are promising for
use in electron sources.
FIG. 5. Photoimage of light emission from a phosphor screen using the
carbon nanotips.
graphene sheet, and NiSi2 has a diamond structure with a
lattice constant of 0.54 nm. After growth of about tens of
graphene sheets, carbon nanotips were grown on these
sheets. During growth of the graphene sheets, amorphous
carbon or defective graphite nanoparticles can form on the
sheets.
Figure 4͑a͒ shows current–voltage characteristics plotted
on linear and log ͑in the box͒ scales for carbon nanotips
deposited for 10 min at a temperature of 700 °C. The elec-
tron emission performance for carbon nanotips was investi-
gated using a diode structure. The gap between the anode
and the carbon nanotips was 1 mm and the anode area was
2 cm2. The turn-on field of the carbon nanotips is
ϳ0.1 V/m. This, we believe, is the lowest value reported
so far. Note that the CNTs show turn-on field of
Ͼ0.5 V/m.13 The emission current of the carbon nanotips
at a field of 1.25 V/m is about 186 A/cm2. This current
density at a field of 1.25 V/m is much higher than the
values of film-type CNTs emitters reported so far.9,14–17
These low turn-on fields and high emission currents are
mainly due to the sharp tip structure and high tip density of
400 tips/m2. Figure 4͑b͒ shows a Fowler–Nordheim ͑FN͒
plot of the emission currents for the carbon nanotips. From
Fowler–Nordheim theory,18 the field emission current I can
be expressed as
1 R. Bacon, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 283 ͑1960͒.
2 S. Iijima, Nature ͑London͒ 354, 56 ͑1991͒.
3 W. B. Choi, D. S. Chung, S. H. Park, and J. M. Kim, SID’99 Dig., 1135
͑1999͒.
4 Q. Zhang, S. F. Yoon, J. Ahn, B. Gan, Rusli, M. B. Yu, L. K. Chean, and
X. Shi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14, 289 ͑2000͒.
5 Z. F. Ren, Z. P. Huang, J. W. Xu, J. H. Wang, P. Bush, M. P. Siegal, and
P. N. Provencio, Science 282, 1105 ͑1998͒.
6 Y. C. Choi, Y. M. Shin, S. C. Lim, D. J. Bae, Y. H. Lee, B. S. Lee, and D.
C. Chung, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 4898 ͑2000͒.
7 T. Hempel, O. Schoenfeld, and F. Syrowatka, Solid State Commun. 85,
921 ͑1993͒.
8 J. Kong, H. T. Soh, A. M. Cassell, and C. F. Quate, Nature ͑London͒ 395,
878 ͑1998͒.
9 S. Fan, M. G. Chapline, N. R. Franklin, T. W. Tombler, A. M. Cassell, and
H. Dai, Science 283, 512 ͑1999͒.
10 C. Bower, O. Zhou, W. Zhu, D. J. Werder, and S. Jin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77,
2767 ͑2000͒.
11 S. H. Tsai, C. W. Chao, C. L. Lee, and H. C. Shih, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74,
3462 ͑1999͒.
12 M. H. Kuang, Z. L. Wang, X. D. Bai, J. D. Guo, and E. G. Wang, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 76, 1255 ͑2000͒.
13 S. Uemura, T. Nagasako, J. Yotani, T. Shimojo, and Y. Saito, SID’98 Dig.,
1052 ͑1998͒.
IϰA 2/͒E2 exp ϪB3/2/ E͒ ,
14 J.-M. Bonard, F. Maier, T. Stockli, A. Chatelain, W. A. de Heer, J.-P.
Salvetat, and L. Forro, Ultramicroscopy 73, 7 ͑1998͒.
15 Q. H. Wang, T. D. Corrigan, J. Y. Dai, R. P. H. Chang, and A. R. Krauss,
͑
͓
͑
͔
where is the work function of the nanotips, A and B are
constants and E is external macroscopic electric field. In the
Fowler–Nordheim plot, a plot of log I/E2 vs 1/E, the slope
of the straight line is B3/2/ with Bϭ6.87
ϫ109 (V eVϪ3/2 mϪ1).14,19 The field amplification factor 
can be obtained from the slope of the FN plot and it was
ϳ13 000 assuming 5 eV for .20 The  reported here is
Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3308 ͑1997͒.
16
ˆ
W. A. de Heer, A. Chatelain, and D. Ugarte, Science 270, 1179 ͑1995͒.
17
¨
J.-M. Bonard, J.-P. Salvetat, T. Stockli, and W. A. de Heer, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 73, 918 ͑1998͒.
18 R. H. Fowler and L. W. Nordheim, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 119, 173
͑1928͒.
19 J. W. Gadzuk and E. W. Plummer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 487 ͑1973͒.
20 B. Robrieux, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. B 278, 659 ͑1974͒.
14
21
smaller than those ͑30 000–50 000͒ of a single free stand-
Alexandrou, M. Baxendale, N. L. Rupesinghe, G. A. J. Amaratunga, and
ing CNTs emitter, but much higher than that of film-type
C. J. Kiely, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18, 2698 ͑2000͒.
137.189.170.231 On: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:03:32