Tong et al.
JOCNote
solutions were added dropwise over a 2 h period. Upon completion
of the additions, the reaction was allowed to stir for an additional
20 min, at which time H2O(100mL) andEt2O (200 mL) were added.
The layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with
Et2O (2 ꢀ 100 mL). The organic extracts were dried with MgSO4.
After filtration, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure.
Chromatography on silica gel (2:1 f 1:1 hexanes:EtOAc) gave the
4.02 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (m, 2H), 2.24 (m, 1H), 2.18
(m, 1H), 1.76 (s, 3H), 1.68 (m, 3H), 1.61 (m, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H),
1.29 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 142.6,
121.3, 63.9, 62.7, 60.5, 58.7, 36.4, 35.3, 29.4, 26.9, 25.0, 24.7,
18.8, 16.9, 16.1; IR (KBr) 2962, 1655, 1454, 1381, 1203, 1122,
876 cm-1; HRMS (APCI) [M þ Hþ] calcd for C15H26O2Br1
317.11107, found 317.11115.
diepoxy allylic sulfone 9(dr=5: 1) as a yellow oil (2.8 g, 71%). [R]23
Tetraepoxy Allylic Sulfone 11. The diepoxy allylic bromide 10
(1.8 g, 5.7 mmol) and diepoxy allylic sulfone 9 (1.6 g, 4.0 mmol)
were dissolved in THF (0.05 M, 81 mL) and cooled to -78 °C.
Then KO-t-Bu (1.0 M solution in THF, 5.3 mL, 5.3 mmol) was
added to the solution via syringe pump over a 30 min period. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at -78 °C. Then saturated
NaHCO3 (200 mL) was added to quench the reaction. The
organic layer was collected and the aqueous layer was extracted
with Et2O (200 mL). The organic extracts were combined and
dried with MgSO4. After filtration, the volatiles were removed
under reduced pressure. Chromatography on silica gel (9:1 f
1.5:1 hexanes:EtOAc þ 0.5% Et3N) gave the tetraepoxy allylic
sulfone 11 as an oil (1.96 g, 77%). [R]23D þ13.8 (c 0.745, CHCl3);
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.71 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (d,
J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 5.01 (m, 2H), 3.73 (m, 1H), 2.69 (m, 4H), 2.44 (s,
3H), 2.40-2.24 (m, 2H), 2.20-2.00 (m, 4H), 1.80-1.50 (m,
12H), 1.62 (s, 6H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s,
3H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
144.6 (2ꢀ), 137.8, 135.3, 129.6 (2ꢀ), 129.3 (2ꢀ), 119.5, 117.8,
64.9, 64.2, 64.0 (2ꢀ), 62.9, 62.7, 60.5, 58.6, 36.5, 35.8, 35.4, 35.3,
29.9, 27.5, 27.4, 27.0, 25.0 (3ꢀ), 24.8 (2ꢀ), 21.8, 18.9, 16.8 (2ꢀ),
16.6; IR (KBr) 2960, 2926, 2856, 1597, 1456, 1381, 1300, 1144,
1059, 1250, 874 cm-1; HRMS (APCI) [M þ Hþ] calcd for
C37H57O6S1 629.38704, found 629.38761.
(3R,6R,7R,18R,19R,22R)-Squalene Tetraepoxide (ent-1). To
a solution of tetraepoxy sulfone 11 (1.96 g, 3.1 mmol) in THF
(0.10 M, 31 mL) was added PdCl2(dppp) (370 mg, 0.62 mmol) at
0 °C. Lithium triethylborohydride (LiBEt3H, 1.0 M solution in
THF, 6.2 mL, 6.2 mmol) was then added dropwise to the
solution over a 15 min period. The reaction mixture was stirred
for an additional 40 min at 0 °C and then diluted with Et2O
(40 mL), followed by the addition of saturated NH4Cl (50 mL).
The organic layer was collected and the aqueous layer was
extracted with Et2O (50 mL). The combined organic fractions
were dried with MgSO4. After filtration, the volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure. Chromatography on silica
gel (9:1 f 1:1 hexanes:EtOAc þ 0.5% Et3N) gave squalene
tetraepoxide (ent-1) as a clear oil (944 mg, 64%) and recovered
11 (218 mg). [R]23D þ15.1 (c 0.81, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 5.18 (br s, 2H), 2.72 (m, 4H), 2.16-2.08 (m, 4H), 2.02
(t, J = 2.8 Hz, 4H), 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.70-1.52 (m, 8H), 1.62 (s,
6H), 1.32 (s, 6H), 1.28 (s, 6H), 1.27 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 134.5, 125.0, 64.1, 63.2, 60.5, 58.6, 36.5, 35.5, 28.4,
27.5, 25.1, 24.9, 18.9, 16.9, 16.3; IR (KBr) 2960, 2926, 2858,
1452, 1379, 1323, 1250, 1120, 874 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) [MþHþ]
calcd for C30H51O4 475.37819, found 475.37829.
D
2.80 (c 1.01, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.72 (d, J =
8.0Hz,2H),7.31(d,J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.21 (t, J=8.0Hz,1H),3.78(d,
J=8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.69 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.14 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.50
(m, 6H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H); 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 144.7, 135.9, 129.8 (2ꢀ), 128.6
(2ꢀ), 111.2, 64.0, 62.7, 60.5, 58.6, 56.2, 36.5, 35.3, 27.1, 25.0, 24.7,
21.8, 18.8, 16.8, 16.4; IR (KBr) cm-1 2962, 2926, 1664, 1597, 1452,
1383, 1313, 1149, 1088, 744; HRMS (ESI) [M þ Hþ] calcd for
C22H33O4S1 393.20941, found 393.20941.
Diepoxy Allylic Bromide 10. To a solution of p-nitrobenzoate
diepoxide 8c (23 g, 57 mmol) dissolved in MeOH (0.50 M, 115 mL)
was added K2CO3 (3.9 g, 29 mmol) all at once. The reaction was
stirred for 15 min. After dilution with Et2O (100 mL), the reaction
was quenched by the addition of a saturated solution of NH4Cl
(250 mL). The organic layer was collected and the aqueous layer
was extracted with EtOAc (2ꢀ250 mL). The organic extracts were
combined and dried with MgSO4. After filtration, the volatiles
were removed under reduced pressure. Prior to chromatography
on silica gel, the mixture of diepoxy allylic alcohol product
containing the poorly soluble byproduct methyl p-nitrobenzoate
was dissolved in minimal EtOAc for loading onto the chromatog-
raphy column. Methyl p-nitrobenzoate eluted from the column
with 4:1 hexanes:EtOAc, and then flushing with 100% EtOAc
provided the polar diepoxy allylic alcohol as an oil (12.8 g, 88%).
[R]23D þ11.0 (c 0.965, CHCl3); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ5.46
(m, 1H), 4.16 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.76-2.71 (m, 2H), 2.21 (m, 1H),
2.16 (m, 1H), 1.79 (m, 1H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.68 (m, 3H), 1.60 (m, 3H),
1.60 (m, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 124.3, 64.1, 62.9, 60.5, 59.4, 58.7, 36.4,
35.3, 27.0, 24.9, 24.7, 18.8, 16.9, 16.4; IR (KBr) 3437, 2924, 1666,
1454, 1385, 1250, 1119, 1011, 872 cm-1; HRMS (APCI) [MþHþ]
calcd for C15H27O3 255.19547, found 255.19552.
This diepoxy allylic alcohol intermediate (12.8 g, 50 mmol)
dissolved in THF (0.30 M, 170 mL) was cooled to -40 °C. Et3N
(10.5 mL, 76 mmol) was then added to the solution all at once,
followed by addition of MsCl (4.71 mL, 60 mmol) all at once.
The reaction was stirred for 30 min at -40 °C. After warming
to 0 °C, flame-dried LiBr (13.1 g, 150 mmol) dissolved in THF
(5.0 M, 30 mL) was added all at once. The reaction mixture was
stirred for an additional 15 min before being diluted with Et2O
(200 mL) and quenched with H2O (200 mL). The organic layer
was collected and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O
(100 mL). The organic extracts were combined and dried with
MgSO4. After filtration, the volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure. To the crude mixture was added hexanes
(100 mL), and the solids were filtered. After removal of the
volatiles under reduced pressure, the analytically pure allylic
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the
National Science Foundation (CHE-0516793).
bromide 10 (15.3 g, 96%) was obtained.14 [R]23 þ4.9 (c 0.85,
D
CHCl3); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.59 (t, J=8.4 Hz, 1H),
Supporting Information Available: 1H and 13C NMR spec-
tra of new compounds. This material is available free of charge
(14) We elected not to subject this sensitive allylic bromide to chroma-
tography, as significant decomposition occurred (even with Et3N buffering).
Once prepared, the allylic bromide 10 was immediately used.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 21, 2009 8409