140
K.R. Reddy et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 252 (2006) 136–141
raising the temperature to 130 ◦C quantitative (95%) yield of
coupled product is achieved (Table 2, entry 1). Further experi-
ments with different aryl halides were carried out under these
optimized conditions and results are summarized in Table 2.
Very good yield (89%) was observed for the reaction of imida-
2-iodoanisole resulted in lower yields, which may be because of
steric factors (Table 2, entry 3). In the case of bromo-derivatives,
4-bromoacetophenone and bromobenzene afforded 70% of the
coupled product (Table 2, entries 4 and 5). Further we have
screened the chloro-derivatives (Table 2, entries 6–8) for the N-
arylation of imidazole. Among them p-nitrochlorobenzene with
a strong electron-withdrawing group resulted in quantitative
yield (Table 2, entry 6), whereas 4-chloroacetophenone resulted
in lower yield (Table 2, entry 7). N-Arylation of imidazole with
chlorobenzene gave no coupled product under the above con-
longer reaction time provided 20% yield of the coupled prod-
uct (Table 2, entry 8). To test further the scope of this catalyst,
resulted in a very good yield (Table 2, entries 9–11).
935.25 of Cu 2p3/2, which are attributed to Cu(0) and Cu(II),
respectively. ICP-AES results of the used CELL-Cu(0) catalyst
indicate leaching of 0.8% of copper in the N-arylation reaction
of imidazole with iodobenzene after the first cycle and 3.5%
after the fourth cycle. In the reaction of imidazole with phenyl-
boronic acid, leaching of 1.1% of copper after the first cycle and
5% after the fourth cycle are observed.
Hyeon and co-workers reported N-arylation of imidazoles
witharylchloridesusingCu2Ocoatedcoppernanoparticles[28].
Rothenberg and co-workers described the synthesis of triazoles
using copper nanoclusters and they reasoned that the surface of
copper metal is usually coated by a monolayer of Cu(I) oxide, a
dark red powder when in bulk, but virtually unnoticeable when
on the metal, which may serve as the source of Cu(I) [30]. We
assume that the present supported catalyst also contains Cu2O
coated copper nanoparticles. However, we could not see Cu2O
either in XRD or XPS because of low concentration of Cu2O.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, cellulose supported copper catalyst was pre-
pared and employed for the N-arylation of nitrogen heterocycles
with a variety of aryl halides and arylboronic acids to afford cor-
responding coupled products in good to excellent yields without
using any external ligands or additives as promoters. The cat-
alyst was recovered by simple filtration and reused for several
cycles.
We followed the N-arylation of imidazole with iodobenzene
by GC at regular intervals of time during the reaction and the
reaction profile is shown in Fig. 3. The conversion gradually
increases with increase of time without the formation of any
by-products.
3.1. Reusability of the catalyst
Acknowledgements
The catalyst was recovered by simple filtration and washed
with acetone and oven dried. The recovered catalyst was
reused for N-arylation of imidazole with different boronic acids
(Table 1, entries 1, 3 and 6) and aryl halide (Table 2, entries 1, 2
and 6) derivatives. These results indicate that the CELL-Cu(0)
catalyst can be used for several cycles successfully with minimal
loss of activity. The high resolution XPS narrow scan (Fig. 2(b))
of the used CELL-Cu(0) catalyst shows two peaks at 932.72 and
We wish to thank the CSIR for financial support under the
Task Force Project COR-0003 and N.S.K. thanks the CSIR,
India, for the award of research fellowship.
References
[1] J.F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 37 (1998) 2046.
[2] (a) W. Negwer, Organic Drugs and Their Synonyms: An International
Survey, seventh ed., Akademie Verlag GmbH, Berlin, 1994;
(b) G.R. Martinez, K.A.M. Walker, D.R. Herschfield, J.J. Bruno, D.S.
Yang, P.J. Moloney, J. Med. Chem. 35 (1992) 620.
[3] (a) P.Y.S. Lam, G. Vincent, C.G. Clark, S. Deudon, K.J. Jadhav, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 42 (2001) 3415;
(b) P. Lopez-Alvarado, C. Avendano, J.C. Menendez, J. Org. Chem. 61
(1996) 5865;
(c) H.M. Lee, S.P. Nolan, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 2053;
(d) W.A. Herrman, C. Kocher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36 (1997) 2161.
[4] (a) F. Ullman, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 36 (1903) 2389;
(b) I. Goldberg, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 39 (1906) 1691.
[5] B.H. Yang, S.L. Buchwald, J. Organomet. Chem. 576 (1999) 125.
[6] (a) J.P. Wolfe, S. Wagaw, J.-F. Marcoux, S.L. Buchwald, Acc. Chem.
Res. 31 (1998) 805;
(b) W.C. Shakespeare, Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999) 2035.
[7] S.K. Kang, S.H. Lee, D. Lee, Synlett (2000) 1022.
[8] P.L. Alvarado, C. Avendano, J.C. Menendez, J. Org. Chem. 60 (1995)
5678.
[9] T. Arnauld, D.H.R. Barton, E. Doris, Tetrahedron 53 (1997) 4137.
[10] P.Y.S. Lam, C.G. Clark, S. Saubern, J. Adams, K.M. Averill, D.M.T.
Chan, A. Combs, Synlett (2000) 674.
[11] (a) P.Y.S. Lam, S. Deudon, K.M. Averill, R. Li, M.Y. He, P. DeShong,
C.G. Clark, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 7600;
Fig. 3. Rate of change of conversion with time.