[HF/HT] has been developed and their multi-functional
potential evaluated for the one-pot selective synthesis of C8
aldol derivatives (aldehydes/alcohols) from propylene. The
[HF/HT] catalyst showed catalytic activity for hydroformyla-
tion, aldol condensation and hydrogenation in one pot. The
Mg/Al ratio of [HT], amount of [HF] complex and [HT], and
reaction temperature showed pronounced effect on the selec-
tivity for C8 aldol derivatives. Aldol condensation temperature
T2 played a significant role in the formation of 2-ethylhexanol
in one pot. As the Mg/Al molar ratio and amount of [HT] was
increased, the selectivity for 2-ethylhexanal also increased due
to the enhancement in the basicity of the catalyst. The amount
of [HF] complex in the catalyst significantly influenced the
selectivity of 2-ethylhexanal. From the kinetic experiments, it
was observed that the rate of formation of 2-ethylhexanal is
dependent on the rate of aldol condensation which is catalyzed
by hydrotalcite in the catalyst. The reaction pathways and role
of each component of multi-functional catalysts [HF/HT] for
the synthesis of 2-ethylhexanol is discussed with the help of the
kinetic profiles of the reaction with time.
Fig. 8 FT-IR spectra for study of the thermal stability of the
[HF/HT(3.5)] system.
Table 5 Effect of the high temperature treatment on the activity of
the catalyst
Selectivity (%)
Acknowledgements
C4 aldehydes C4 alcohols C8 aldehydes/alcohols
We thank Dr P. K. Ghosh, Director, CSMCRI, Bhavnagar,
India, for encouraging this publication and Network Project
on Catalysis, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
(CSIR), New Delhi, India for financial supports. S. K. S.
thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for the award of a Senior Research
Fellowship.
Fresh catalyst 40
6
71
76
77
54
o1
o1
o1
Second run
Third run
Fourth run
28
23
22
Reaction conditions: Partial pressure of propylene = 10 atm, partial
pressure of CO = 5 atm, partial pressure of H2 = 15 atm, [HF/HT
(3.5)] = 700 mg, HT/HF = 7, T1 = 60 1C, t1 = 3 h, T2 = 150 1C,
t2 = 9 h, total time (t) = 12 h.
References
1 V. K. Srivastava, D. U. Parmar and R. V. Jasra, Chem. Weekly,
July 8, 2003, 173–178, and July 15, 2003, 181–190; Oxo Chemical
Report, SRI International, January 2003.
2 D. Frohning and C. W. Kohlpaintner, in Applied Homogeneous
Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, ed. B. Cornils and W. A.
Hermann, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000, vol. 1, ch. 2, pp. 29–104.
3 A. D. Godwin, R. H. Schlosberg, F. Hershkowitz, M. G Matturro,
G. Kiss, K. C. Nadler, P. L Buess, R. C Miller, P. W. Allen, H. W.
Deckman, R. Caers, E. J. Mozeleski, J. Edmund and R. P.
Reynolds, US Pat., 6,307,093, 2001.
High-temperature treatment in hydrogen may cluster the
[HF] complex into Rh(0) supported aggregates, which is an
efficient catalyst for hydrogenation, but quite unreactive in the
hydroformylation of propylene. Keeping this point in view, we
have checked the catalytic activity of [HF/HT(3.5)] after four
successive runs, using the same catalyst under identical reac-
tion conditions. The results are shown in Table 5.
As seen from the data in Table 5, no change of activity of
the [HF] complex was observed in the hydroformylation and
hydrogenation reaction after high temperature treatment in
the presence of excess hydrogen atmosphere (Table 5). There-
fore, it can be safely said that under the conditions employed
in our reaction, the formation of Rh(0) is less likely. However,
the activity of [HT] on the aldol condensation of the aldehyde
was influenced significantly with a loss of selectivity for
C8 aldehydes/alcohols. This can be attributed to the structural
changes of hydrotalcite as evidenced by X-ray diffraction
(Fig. 7). This clearly shows that the [HF/HT] catalyst is
thermally stable up to 150 1C and slow decomposition follows
up to 200 1C. This is consistent with our experimental data,
which showed that excellent selectivity with respect to C8 aldol
derivatives was observed in the temperature range 150–200 1C.
4 (a) F. J. Doering and G. F. Schaefer, J. Mol. Catal., 1987, 41,
313–328; (b) B. J. Arena and J. S. Holmgren, US Pat., 5,144,089,
1992.
5 G. Horn, C. D. Frohning, H. Liebern and W. Zgorzelski, US Pat.,
5,475,161, 1995.
6 W. Bueschken and J. Hummel, US Pat., 5,756,856, 1998.
7 H. G. Lueken, U. Tanger, W. Droste, G. Ludwig and D. Gubisch,
US Pat., 4,968,849, 1990.
8 T. Mori, K. Fujita and H. Hinoishi, US Pat., 5,550,302, 1996.
9 (a) J. J. Spivey and M. R. Gogate, Pollution Prevention in Industrial
Condensation Reactions, Research Triangle Institute, USEPA
Grant, 1996; (b) G. J. Kelly, F. King and M. Kett, Green Chem.,
2002, 4, 392–399.
10 D. Tichit and B. Coq, CATTECH, 2003, 7, 206.
11 M. Tomoyuki, O. Yasukazu, F. Koichi, E. Hiroki and T. Akio,
Jpn. Pat., 11,269,118, 1999.
12 C. R. Greene, US Pat., 3,278,612, 1966.
13 R. V. Jasra, V. K. Srivastava, R. S. Shukla, H. C. Bajaj and S. D.
Bhatt, US and PCT Pat., US Appl. No. 20060149101, 2006.
14 D. D. Perrin, W. L. F. Armarego and D. D. Perrin, Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals, Pegamon Press, Oxford, 2nd edn, 1980.
15 D. Evans, G. Yagupsky and G. Wilkinson, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1968,
2660–2665.
Conclusions
Rhodium complex; HRh(CO)(PPh3)3 [HF] and hydrotalcite
(Mg1ÀxAlx(OH2))x+(CO3
16 M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra, K. Epping and A. Velty, J.
Catal., 2004, 225, 316–326.
2À
)
x/n Á mH2O) [HT] based catalyst
ꢀc
This journal is the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2007
New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 277–286 | 285