Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06268C
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
(
Fig. S5, ESI†), three peaks located at 856.9 eV, 858.1 eV and
7
(a) R.V. Jagadeesh, A. Surkus, H. Junge, M. Pohl, J. Radnik, J.
Rabeah, H.M. Huan and M. Beller, Science, 2013, 342, 1073;
8
59.2 eV indicate oxidized nickel species in the spent catalyst,
(
b) F.A. Westerhaus, R.V. Jagadeesh, G. Weienhofer, M. Pohl,
J. Radnik, K. Junge, H. Junge, A. Bruckner and M. Beller, Nat.
Chem., 2013, , 537; (c) A.L. Wang, H.B. Yin, M. Ren, H.H. Lu,
which is in agreement with the fresh one. And also the content
of Ni is quantified to be 3.2 at% (13.06 wt. %) by XPS studies
5
(
Table S3, ESI†), which is a little lower than that of the fresh
J.J. Xue and T.S. Jiang, New J. Chem., 2010, 34, 708.
Y.Qiu and L. Gao, Chem. Commun., 2003, 18, 2378.
(a) T. Fu, M. Wang, W.M. Cai, Y.M. Cui, F. Gao, L.M. Peng, W.
Chen and W.P. Ding, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2536; (b) T. Fu, P.
Hu, T. Wang, Z. Dong, N.H. Xue, L.M. Peng, X.F. Guo, W.P.
catalyst (3.75 at%, 13.56 wt. %), which may be induced by a
slightly corrosion of nickel in reaction process when
considering the porous properties of Ni/CN. Moreover, Ni
8
9
content in H
2 4
SO solution with a constant volume (100.0 mL) is
Ding, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, DOI: 10.1016/S1872-
2067(15)60904-4.
10− mg mL− by inductively coupled
4
1
estimated to be 8.5
×
plasma (ICP) investigation. Additionally, elemental analysis for 10 (a) X.C. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin,
J.M. Carlsson, K. Domen and M. Anitonietti, Nat. Mater.,
carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen is carried out to give more
2
Antonietti, RSC Adv., 2013,
1 D. Hulicova, J. Yamashita, Y. Soneda, H. Hatori and M.
Kodama, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 1241.
009,
8
, 76; (b) J. Liu, J.H. Huang, D. Dontosova and M.
structural information about the catalyst. The results are
displayed in Table S4 (ESI†) and both catalysts show a
comparative composition. Carbon exhibits a large proportion
3, 22988.
1
about 70.0 wt. % and nitrogen accounts for nearly 3.0 wt. % 12 A. Thomas, A. Fischer, F. Goettmann, M. Antonietti, J. Müller,
R. Schlögl and J.M. Carlsson, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 4893.
while the content of hydrogen is about 2.6 wt. %. Meanwhile,
1
3 (a) W.R. Li, D.H. Chen, Z. Li, Y.F. Shi, Y. Wan, G. Wang, Z.Y.
Jiang and D.Y. Zhao, Carbon, 2007, 45, 1757; (b) N.P.
Wickramaratne, J.T. Xu, M. Wang, L. Zhu, L.M. Dao and M.
Jaroniec, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 2820.
content of Ni and S is also analysed by X-ray fluorescence
spectrometry (XRF) as 15.5 wt. % and 1.98 wt. % respectively
for the as-prepared catalyst. Therefore, oxygen accounts for
7
.23 wt. % in Ni/CN when refers to the results of elemental 14 C.E. Chan-Thaw, A. Villa, P. Katekomol, D.S. Su, A. Thomas
and L. Prati. Nano. Lett., 2010, 10, 537.
analysis and XRF. Furthermore, XRD spectrum of spent catalyst
shows the metallic nickel (Fig. S6, ESI†) and catalyst after a
long-term reaction exhibits a little change on Ni particle size
from the fresh catalyst according to the TEM images (Fig. S7,
1
1
5 K. Parminder, T.H. Joseph and, T.N. Sonbinh. ACS Catal.,
011, , 819.
6 T, Wang, Y.C. Zhao, M, Luo, L.M. Zhang, Y. Cui, C.S. Zhang
2
1
and B.H. Han, Polymer, 2015, 60, 26.
ESI†). Besides, catalysts with different Ni loading are prepared 17 J. Liu, S.Z. Qiao, Q.H. Hu and G.Q. Lu, Small, 2011,
7
8 Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, L. Ge, M. Jaroniec and S.Z. Qiao, Angew.
, 425.
1
for comparison and the TEM images (Fig. S8, ESI†) show that
all catalysts possess a similar Ni particle size distribution which
may be attributed to the intrinsic porous character of GTP. And
their catalyꢁc acꢁvity are displayed in Table S5 (ESI†).
Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 3110.
9 (a) Q.X. Guo, Y. Xie, X.J. Wang, S.Y. Zhang, T. Hou and S.V. Lv,
Chem. Commun., 2004, 1, 26; (b) M. Kim, S. Hwang and J.S.
1
Yu, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 1656; (c) Y.A. Li, J. Zhang, Q.S.
Wang, Y.X. Jin, D.H. Huang, Q.L. Cui and G.T. Zou, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2010, 114, 9429.
0 S. Kundu, W. Xia, W. Busser, D.A. Schmidt, M. Havenith and
M. Muhler, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 4351.
1 H.P. Bonzel and H.J. Krebs. Sur. Sci., 1980, 91, 499.
In summary, experimental researches on the design and
performance of an acid-resistant catalyst with a characteristic
structure described as CN-encapsulated nickel embedded in N-
doped porous carbon are reported for the hydrogenation of
2
2
nitrobenzene to p-aminophenol. The catalyst would be viewed 22 (a) C. Ronning, D. Schwen, S. Eyhusen, U. Vetter and H.
as reverse loaded CN on nickel in a structure of heterojunction,
with which the catalyst showed excellent stability in sulphuric
acid for hydrogen adsorption and catalytically active for the
one-pot hydrogenation of nitro-benzene to p-aminophenol.
Hofsäss, Surf. Coat. Tech., 2002, 158, 382; (b) J. Schäfer, J,
Ristein, R. Graupner and L. Ley, Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 53, 7762.
2
3 (a) Y. Wang, D.W. Matson and Y.H. Lin, ACS Nano., 2010,
790; (b) C. Malitesta, L. Sabbatini and P.G. Zambonin, J.
Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1995, 76, 629.
4,
1
The unique structure would bring about new designs of 24 V. Datsyuk, M. Kalyva, K. Papagelis, J. Parthenios, D. Tasis, A.
catalysts with properties unexpected from those in traditional
structures.
Siokou, I. Kallitsis and C. Galiotis, Carbon, 2008, 46, 833.
5 S.R. Kirumakki, B.G. Shpeizer, G.V. Sagar, K.V.R. Chary and A.
Clearfield, J. Catal., 2006, 242, 319.
6 G. Claude, A. Aline, R. Enrique and M. Antonio. Appl. Catal A-
Gen., 2003, 251, 199.
7 G. Poncelet, M.A. Centeno and R. Molina, Appl. Catal. A-
Gen., 2005, 288, 232.
8 Z.F. Zhao, Z.J. Wu, L.X. Zhou, M.H. Zhang, W. Li and K.Y. Tao,
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Notes and references
1
2
3
C.O. Henke and J.V. Vaughen, US Patent, 1940, 2198249.
R.G. Bennern, US Patent, 1968, 3383416.
(a) T. Komatsu and T. Hirose, Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2004, 276
Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 2191.
9 X.G. Duan, K.OʼDonnell, H.Q. Sun, Y.X. Wang and S.B. Wang,
Small, 2015, 11, 3036.
0 Z. Yang, Z. Yao, G.F. Li, G.Y. Fang, H.G. Nie, Z. L, X.M. Zhou,
9
5; (b) C.V. Rode, M.J. Vaidya and R.V. Chaudhari, Chem.
Eng. Sci., 2001, 56, 1299; (c) C.V. Rode, M.J. Vaidya and R.V.
Chaudhari, Org. Process Res. Dev., 1999, , 465.
3
X.A. Chen and S.M. Huang, ACS Nnao, 2012, 6, 205.
4
(a) S.K. Tanielyan, J.J. Nair, N. Martin, G. Alvez, R.J. McNair,
D.J. Wang and R.L. Augustine, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2007,
1 D. Abhay, F. Figueras, M.L. Kantam, K.J. Ratnam, R. S. Reddy
and N.S. Sekhar, J. Catal., 2010, 275, 250.
2 S.F. Wang, B.B. He, Y.J. Wang and X.Q. Zhao, Catal. Commun.,
11 681; (b) Y. Gao, F.D. Wang, S.J. Liao and D.R. Yu, React.
Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1998, 64, 351.
2
012, 24, 109.
3 W.W. Lin, H.Y. Cheng, J. Ming, Y.C. Yu and F.Y. Zhao, J. Catal.,
012, 291, 149.
5
6
C.V. Rode, M.J. Vaidya and R.V. Chaudhari, Europe Patent,
2
002, 1229018.
A. Zoran, O. Khodzhaev and Y. Sasson, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun., 1994, 2239.
2
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins