immunoassays are capable of detecting target molecules in
real biological samples.
In conclusion, this communication designs a novel sandwich-
type electrochemical immunoassay for ultrasensitive determina-
tion of human IgG by using redox-active nanocatalysts as labels
with electrocatalytic recycling of self-produced reactants. High-
lights of this work are to explore a newly multifunctional
conductive polymer nanostructure with redox activity for the
signal amplification of electrochemical immunoassay by redox
recycling of self-produced reactants during organic synthesis
(AP 2 QI). More importantly, the methodology can avoid the
use of two working electrodes or multiple enzymes for the
amplification of the electrochemical signal. Compared with
conventional immuno-PCR assays, the nanocatalyte-based
immunoassay is of low-cost, simple, and sensitive.
Fig. 4 (a) Calibration plots and (b) specificity of the electrochemical
immunoassay toward HIgG standards in pH 8.0 NaBH -PBS containing
0.0 mM NP (inset: the corresponding DPV curves).
4
1
voltammetry (DPV) with a sandwich-type immunoassay format.
As shown from the inset of Fig. 4a, DPV peak currents increased
with the increasing HIgG concentration. A linear dependence
between the peak currents and the logarithm of HIgG was
Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (no. 21075019 and 41176079), the ‘‘973’’ National Basic
Research Program of China (no. 2010CB732403), the Research
Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
(no. 20103514120003), and the National Science Foundation of
Fujian Province (no. 2011J06003) is gratefully acknowledged.
À1
À1
À1
obtained in the range from 0.01 pg mL to 100 ng mL with
a detection limit (LOD) of 1.0 fg mL estimated at the 3sblank
level (n = 11) (Fig. 4a). In addition, we also compared the
properties of the electrochemical immunoassay with other HIgG
assay methods reported previously. As seen from Table S1 (see
ESIw), the wide linear range and a low detection limit of the
developed immunoassay were acceptable. Although the system
has not yet been optimized for maximum efficiency, the assay
sensitivity of using GPANGs as nanocatalysts was 100-fold
Notes and references
1
(a) J. Das, M. Aziz and H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
28, 16022; (b) G. Jie, J. Zhang, D. Wang, C. Cheng, H. Chen and
1
1c
lower than our most recent report.
J. Zhu, Anal. Chem., 2008, 80, 4033; (c) J. Tang, L. Hou, D. Tang,
B. Zhang, J. Zhou and G. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8180.
(a) J. Tang, D. Tang, R. Niessner, G. Chen and D. Knopp, Anal.
Chem., 2011, 83, 5407; (b) G. Lai, F. Yang and H. Ju, Anal. Chem.,
The specificity of the electrochemical immunoassay was
monitored by challenging the system with other biomolecules
such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen
2
2
009, 81, 9730.
(
CEA), prolactin (PRL), and rabbit IgG (RIgG). Significantly
À1
3 (a) T. Selvaraju, J. Das, K. Jo, K. Kwon, C. Huh, T. K. Kim and
H. Yang, Langmuir, 2008, 24, 9883; (b) K. Chuah, L. Lai, I. Goon,
S. Parker, R. Amal and J. J. Gooding, Chem. Commun., 2012,
higher currents were observed with target HIgG (10 ng mL as
À1
an example) than those with other biomolecules (10 ng mL in
4
8, 3503; (c) W. Zhao, X. Dong, J. Wang, F. Kong, J. Xu and
this case) (Fig. 4b). These results clearly manifested the high
specificity of the electrochemical immunoassay.
H. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5253; (d) M. Akanda, Y. Choe
and H. Yang, Anal. Chem., 2012, 84, 1049; (e) S. Xu, Y. Liu,
T. Wang and J. Li, Anal. Chem., 2011, 83, 3817; (f) D. Tang,
J. Tang, B. Su and G. Chen, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2010, 58, 10824;
The reproducibility and precision of the developed electro-
chemical immunoassay were evaluated by calculating intra-
and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs). We repeatedly
(
g) G. Lai, F. Yan and H. Ju, Anal. Chem., 2009, 81, 9730.
4 (a) D. Tang, Z. Zhong, R. Niessner and D. Knopp, Analyst, 2009,
134, 1554; (b) J. Tang, D. Tang, R. Niessner and D. Knopp, Anal.
Bioanal. Chem., 2011, 400, 2041.
À1
assayed three different HIgG levels containing 1.0 pg mL
À1
,
À1
1
00 pg mL , and 10 ng mL under the same circumstances.
Experimental results revealed that the coefficients of variation
5
(a) S. Yoo, T. Jeon, K. Lee, K. Park and Y. Sung, Chem. Commun.,
010, 46, 794; (b) Y. Tan, J. Fan, G. Chen, N. Zheng and Q. Xie,
2
(
CVs) of the inter-assay were 7.1%, 9.8%, and 9.5% for
À1 À1 À1
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 11624; (c) K. Lee, R. Anisur, K. Kim,
W. Kim, T. Park, E. Kang and I. Lee, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 682;
1
.0 pg mL , 100 pg mL , and 10 ng mL HIgG, respec-
(
d) S. Polarz, F. Neues, M. van den Berg, W. Grunert and
tively, whereas the CVs of the intra-assay were 8.8%, 8.1%
and 9.7% towards the above-mentioned analytes. Therefore, the
precision and reproducibility of the developed immunosensor
was acceptable. In addition, the electrochemical immunosensor
exhibited satisfactory stability, and B90% of the initial peak
current was preserved after storage of the immunosensor and
nanolabels at 4 1C for 28 days.
L. Khodeir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12028; (e) W. Yan,
S. M. Mahurin, Z. Pan, S. H. Overbury and S. Dai, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 10480.
6
7
(a) N. Zheng and G. D. Stucky, Chem. Commun., 2007, 3862;
b) H. Yin, C. Wang, H. Zhu, S. H. Overbury, S. Sun and S. Dai,
(
Chem. Commun., 2008, 4357; (c) H. Koga, T. Kitaoka and
H. Wariishi, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 5244; (d) C. Chiang,
A. Wang, B. Wan and C. Mou, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005,
1
1
09, 18042; (e) F. Lin and R. Doong, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011,
15, 6591.
To further evaluate the analytical reliability and possible
application of the newly developed technique to be applied for
the testing of the real sample, it was applied for the analysis
of 3 HIgG samples of various concentrations including
(a) J. Tang, D. Tang, B. Su, J. Huang, B. Qiu and G. Chen, Biosens.
Bioelectron., 2011, 26, 3219; (b) S. Wunder, Y. Lu, M. Albrecht and
M. Ballauff, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 908; (c) K. Kuroda, T. Ishida and
M. Haruta, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2009, 298, 7; (d) X. Li, Y. Liu,
Z. Xu and H. Yan, Eur. Polym. J., 2011, 47, 1877.
À1 À1 À1
0
.1 pg mL , 1.0 ng mL and 50 ng mL , which were
obtained by spiking HIgG standards into blank fetal calf
serum. The assayed results for the above-mentioned 3 HIgG
8 (a) M. Anderson, B. Mattes, H. Reiss and R. Kaner, Science, 1991,
252, 1412; (b) H. Wang, Q. Hao, X. Yang, L. Lu and X. Wang,
Nanoscale, 2010, 2, 2164; (c) Y. Cui, H. Chen, L. Hou, B. Zhang,
B. Liu, G. Chen and D. Tang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2012, 738, 76.
À1
À1
À1
analytes were 0.12 pg mL , 0.96 ng mL and 47.5 ng mL ,
respectively. The recoveries were 120%, 96% and 95%,
respectively. The results revealed that the newly proposed
9
S. Praharaj, S. Nath, S. Ghosh, S. Kundu and T. Pal, Langmuir,
2004, 20, 9889.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10307–10309 10309