A R T I C L E S
Bohle and Spina
tion of nanomaterials. The inclusion of divalent metal dopants,
including Ni(II), Co(II), and Mn(II), is known to decrease the
photocatalytic (PC) activity of ZnO NCs.40 The electronic
activity of ZnO NCs may also be altered with surface modifica-
tion as previously shown in the case of silane-modified ZnO.27,41
The relationship between the NC surface, PL, and PC activity
is exemplified in the inverse relationship between particle size
and both visible PL intensity and PC activity.8,36,40,42 This
relationship between PC activity and PL and the ZnO NCs
surface was elucidated by monitoring both PL and PC while
varying the surface modifier concentration and identity. Quan-
tification of the photochemical activity of ZnO NCs was
accomplised via photodegradation of 4-nitrophenol (4NP), a
spectrophotometric reference material.32,33,43 Changes in the PC
activity and PL with the addition of trimethylsilanolate and
Co(II) were utilized to investigate the structure and character
of the surface sites.
dependence on the surface to volume ratio as well as electronic
confinement.44-46 Consideration of the defects or strains in the
crystal lattice due to size constraints is essential to explain the
physical and chemical phenomena associated with the nano-
structures. We have demonstrated that the prepared ZnO NCs
have a P63mc wurtzite hexagonal lattice from the synchrotron
X-ray powder diffraction patterns, Supporting Information,
Figure S8. In determining the significance and relationship of
the surface with respect to the emission properties of ZnO, one
must first examine the possible geometries which may be present
on the nanocrystalline surface. The surface is important to
consider, as interaction of adsorbates on the surface significantly
influence the photochemical properties of the ZnO NCs.26,47,48
The most common face terminations of bulk ZnO include the
polar Zn-terminated (0001) and O-terminated (000-1) faces (c-
axis oriented), and the nonpolar (11-20) faces (a-axis), and (10-
10) faces which both contain an equal number of Zn and O
atoms.49 It is known that the faces of [0001], a polar orientation
and [01-10], a nonpolar face, have anisotropic growth rates (ν):
ν [0001] . ν [01-10] > ν [000-1]. The stability of the surfaces
is also anisotropic where the polar faces have greater stability
than the nonpolar faces. An inherent polarity exists in the crystal,
where the character of the Zn-O bond is strongly ionic. The
PC activity of the individual faces has been investigated, and
the (0001) and (000-1) faces are found to be largely responsible
for the majority of the PC activity of ZnO in terms of H2O2
production.50 It has also been noted that defects on the (10-10)
face may promote dissociative adsorption of oxygen where a
Photodegradation of 4-nitrophenol (4NP) by ZnO NCs is a
known first-order PC process, Supporting Information, Figure
S3, Scheme S4.32,33,43 The PC rates of ZnO NCs, modified and
unmodified, were calculated by monitoring the UV-visible
absorbance (λmax ) 401 nm, ε ) 19200 M-1 cm-1) of 4NP,
described by eqs 1 and 2.
-dC/dt ) k1C
ln(Co/Ct) ) k1t
(1)
(2)
The rates of photodegradation and PL intensities were
compared at variable adsorbent concentrations, Figure 3. Cobalt
was found to be considerably more effective in inhibiting ZnO
PC activity. The addition of 1% Co(II) results in about a 40%
decrease in both PC capacity and PL. Similar trends are observed
for both the PC rates and PL of ZnO NCs upon the addition of
Me3SiO-K+ with a 50% and 40% decrease in activity, respec-
tively, after modification with one equivalent of Me3SiO-K+.
Although the PL and PC activity are interrelated, the relationship
is not direct. Whether there is modification of the ZnO NC
surface by trimethylsilanolate anion or Co(II), the result is a
decrease in both PL and PC activity, and a clear correlation is
observed. Understanding this relationship between the PL and
PC activity will provide insight into the origin of the defect
emission and the chemistry behind the photocatalysis which will
advance our ability to utilize ZnO NCs.
spontaneous 2e- charge transfer from Vo to O2 (pπ*) will
x
facilitate dissociation.51 Oxygen dissociation results in “filling”
oxygen vacancies that are present, resulting in a “healing” of
the surface with an expected change in electronic properties.
This type of surface alteration upon photoexcitation has been
investigated by us previously.34 Discrete facets are not the only
thing to consider when dealing with ZnO NC surface structure.
It is also important to account for lattice perturbations due to
the inherent curvature that is not described for bulk ZnO. These
lattice truncations and surface curvature must be taken into
greater consideration in nanostructures even though they are
rarely examined in structural detail.9,15,31,52,53 From the observa-
tions described above it is obvious that there is more than one
site contributing to the visible emission. We propose that the
effects on photocatalysis and photoluminescence are due not
only to electronics but also to specific surface interactions. To
investigate the unique surface interactions, silanolate and cobalt
Discussion
As a bulk material the ZnO wurtzite lattice is composed of
three different geometric faces, two polar surfaces of opposite
charge: (0001) and (000-1), and a neutral surface: (11-20),
Supporting Information, Figure S5. However, the size constraints
imposed by nanomaterials causes these faces to become skewed
in nanoparticles and may result in a core and surface structure
different from those of the bulk phase. The dependence on the
PC and PL features based on size of the NCs indicates
(44) Cheng, H.-M.; Lin, K.-F.; Hsu, H.-C.; Hsieh, W.-F. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2006, 88, 261909/1–261909/3.
(45) Fu, Z. D.; Cui, Y. S.; Zhang, S. Y.; Chen, J.; Yu, D. P.; Zhang, S. L.;
Niu, L.; Jiang, J. Z. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 263113/1–263113/3.
(46) Lin, K.-F.; Cheng, H.-M.; Hsu, H.-C.; Hsieh, W.-F. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2006, 88, 263117/1–263117/3.
(47) Hong, R.; Pan, T.; Qian, J.; Li, H. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 119, 71–81.
(48) Wu, Y. L.; Tok, A. I. Y.; Boey, F. Y. C.; Zeng, X. T.; Zhang, X. H.
Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 5473–5479.
(49) Jagadish, C.; Pearton, S. Zinc Oxide Bulk, Thin Films and Nanostruc-
tures: Processing, Properties and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
2006.
(39) Polyakov, A. Y.; Smirnov, N. B.; Govorkov, A. V.; Kozhukhova,
E. A.; Pearton, S. J.; Norton, D. P.; Osinsky, A.; Dabiran, A. J.
Electron. Mater. 2006, 35, 663–669.
(50) Jang, E. S.; Won, J.-H.; Hwang, S.-J.; Choy, J.-H. AdV. Mater.
(40) Casey, P. S.; Rossouw, C. J.; Boskovic, S.; Lawrence, K. A.; Turney,
T. W. Superlattices Microstruct. 2005, 39, 97–106.
(41) Rohe, B.; Veeman, W. S.; Tausch, M. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 277–
282.
(Weinheim, Ger.) 2006, 18, 3309–3312.
(51) Ischenko, V.; Polarz, S.; Grote, D.; Stavarache, V.; Fink, K.; Driess,
M. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 1945–1954.
(52) Shen, X.; Pederson, M. R.; Zheng, J.-C.; Davenport, J. W.; Muckerman,
J. T.; Allen, P. B. Los Alamos Natl. Lab., Prepr. Arch., Condens.
mat/0610002 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].
(42) Zheng, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhan, Y.; Lin, X.; Zheng, Q.; Wei, K.; Zhu, J.;
Zhu, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 6675–6682.
(43) Marais, E.; Klein, R.; Antunes, E.; Nyokong, T. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2007, 261, 36–42.
(53) Cheng, W. H.; Kung, H. H. Surf. Sci. 1981, 102, L21–L28.
9
4400 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 12, 2009