1
612
Communications of the American Ceramic Society
Vol. 85, No. 6
(2) The presence of a liquid is much more favorable for
chemical homogeneity and heat transfer. In sublimation, thermal
contact between the solid and the crucible may be variable.
Whereas the yields for both processes were comparable, the yield
for the distillation process did decrease during the 4th and 5th
hours. The reason for this was that, as the distillation proceeded,
the melt became barium-rich and higher temperatures were re-
quired to continue distilling ZrF from the melt.
4
(3) The melt functions to physically wet oxide particles,
preventing them from contaminating the final product. In subli-
mation, an impurity-rich oxide residue results, and it is possible for
this oxide impurity to become entrained in the vapor.
(4) Because a melt is produced, it is possible to use ESD. This
is not possible using simple sublimation techniques. However, our
results show that ESD using zirconium metal produces a variable
material that is not suitable for glass synthesis.
Fig. 2. DRIFTS spectra of Morita ZrF (upper curve) and distilled ZrF
4
4
(lower curve). (Spectra are offset with respect to each other for clarity).
BaF ). To maximize the yield of purified ZrF , we investigated the
V. Conclusion
2
4
effect of adding further aliquots of impure ZrF4 to the melt
remaining after distillation and then redistilling this mixture. This
procedure was repeated three times and a sample of ZrF4 was
analyzed from each distillation. Although the impurity level of the
Purification of ZrF4 by distillation of ZrF –BaF melts was
4
2
achieved. The purified material was extremely dry and had low
levels of carbon, oxygen, and transition metals. These results
showed that distillation was an effective method and was superior
to the frequently reported method of sublimation in the literature.
Using this material, we were able to report the highest level of
melt increased with each addition of ZrF , no increase in
4
transition-metal impurities was found in any of the samples of
purified ZrF ; i.e., all four samples returned similar levels of iron,
4
1
–3
Er(III) doping in fluorozirconate glasses.
nickel, and copper.
References
IV. Discussion
1
V. K. Bogdanov, W. E. K. Gibbs, D. J. Booth, J. S. Javorniczky, P. J. Newman,
and D. R. MacFarlane, “Fluorescence from Highly Doped Erbium Fluorozirconate
Glasses Pumped at 800 nm,” Optics Commun., 132, 73–76 (1996).
This research program has established that distillation is the
method of choice for purification of ZrF for several reasons.
4
2
(
1) The analytical values given in Table I show that sublima-
tion decreases the iron, nickel, and copper impurities by a factor of
, while distillation decreases the iron by a factor of 8–10. The
D. R. MacFarlane, J. S. Javorniczky, P. J. Newman, V. K. Bogdanov, D. J. Booth,
and W. E. K. Gibbs, “High-Er(III)-Content ZBN Glasses for Microchip Laser
Applications,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 213 & 214, 158 (1995).
2
3
J. S. Javorniczky, “Rare-Earth-Containing Fluoride Glasses for Optoelectronic
substantial decrease in the iron impurity resulting from distillation
is due to two factors. First, the melt decreases the sublimation
Devices”; Ph. D. Thesis. Monash University, Clayton, Australia, 1997.
K. J. Ewing and J. A. Sommers, “Purification and Analysis of Metal Fluorides”;
pp. 142–208 in Fluoride Glass Fiber Optics. Edited by I. D. Aggarwal and G. Lu.
4
3
ϩ
2ϩ
tendency of Fe and Fe because of a vapor pressure decrease
of their fluorides as a consequence of Raoult’s law. Second, there
is a tendency of FeF to fluorinate ZrO (Eq. (1)) to form Fe O .
Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1991.
5
M. Robinson, “Preparation and Purification of Fluoride Glass Starting Materials,”
3
2
2
3
Mater. Sci. Forum, 5, 19–34 (1985).
6
ZrO is produced by the reaction of water with ZrF (Eq. (2)) or by
M. Robinson, “Processing and Purification Techniques of Heavy-Metal Fluoride
2
4
1
3
Glass (HMFG),” J. Cryst. Growth, 75, 184–94 (1986).
the reaction of BaO with ZrF (Eq. (4)). (BaO is the hydrolysis
4
7
M. Robinson, “High-Purity Components for Fluorozirconate Glass Optical Fi-
product of BaF2 and water (Eq. (3))). The advantage of this
reaction scheme is that Fe O is far less volatile than FeF . This
bers”; pp. 11–25 in Halide Glasses for Infrared Optics. Edited by R. M. Almeida.
2
3
3
Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987.
8
scheme is analogous to the decrease of iron in sublimation by the
D. F. Shriver and M. Drezdzon, The Manipulation of Air-Sensitive Compounds;
1
4
pp. 82–83. Wiley, New York, 1986.
deliberate addition of oxides, first reported by Tatsuno.
9
P. J. Newman, A. T. Voelkel, and D. R. MacFarlane, “Analysis of Fe, Cu, Ni, and
Co in Fluoride Glasses and Their Precursors,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 184, 324–28
4
2
ZrO ϩ FeF 3 ZrF ϩ Fe O
(1)
(2)
2
3
4
2
3
(1995).
3
3
1
0
C. Byrne and G. Rosman, “FTIR Spectroscopy of Fluoride Powders, Glasses, and
Fibres”; pp. 8.59–8.64 in Extended Abstracts of 7th International Symposium on
Halide Glasses (Lorne, Australia, 1991). (Available from the Conference Chair,
d.macfarlane@sci.monash.edu.au.)
ZrF ϩ 2H O 3 ZrO ϩ 4HF
4
2
2
1
1
BaF ϩ H O 3 BaO ϩ 2HF
(3)
(4)
Powder Diffraction File No. 33–1480. International Centre for Diffraction Data,
Newtown Square, PA, 1987.
2
2
1
2
ZrF ϩ 2BaO 3 ZrO ϩ 2BaF
2
R. C. Pastor and M. Robinson, “Method for Preparing Ultra-Pure Zirconium and
Hafnium Tetrafluorides,” U.S. Pat. No. 4 578 252, 1985.
4
2
1
3
K. Fujiura, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Ohishi, and Y. Terunuma, “Formation Reaction of
Scatterers in ZrF -Based Fluoride Fibers,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71 [5] 460–64
1988).
One important consequence of this reaction scheme is that multiple
distillations are therefore possible, with no increase in impurity
level. This is advantageous for producing large amounts of
material with little waste.
ZrO
2
4
(
14
T. Tatsuno, “Synthesis of Iron-Impurity-Free ZrF
181–86 (1987).
4
,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 19– 20,
Ⅺ