8
photooxygenation of allylic alcohols. Furthermore, this way
enables the introduction of a wide variety of functional
groups at the level of the nonperoxidic starting materials.
In the course of our recent work on the photoinduced
electron-transfer oxygenation of alkenes, we observed the
formation of 1,2-dioxanes by trapping of arylated alkene
Scheme 3
9
radical cations with triplet oxygen. Surprisingly, this reaction
was also observed with prenol (2-methyl-2-buten-4-ol, 1).
When irradiated in acetonitrile in the presence of catalytic
amounts of 9,10-dicyanoanthracene (DCA) and oxygen, the
1
,2,4-trioxane 2 was formed in low yield (Scheme 2). A
vironmentally more friendly approach, we have recently
developed the polystyrene (PS) microcontainer photooxy-
1
3
genation for the ene reaction of 3. In this solvent-free
approach, the diastereoselectivity drops remarkably in com-
Scheme 2
4
parison to the reaction in CCl due to the high (protic)
substrate concentration. With this efficient source of â-hy-
droperoxyalcohol 4 in hand, we investigated the peroxy-
acetalization with a series of carbonyl components. Boron
trifluoride etherate turned out to be the most efficient Lewis
acid catalyst, and the trans-5,6-disubstituted trioxanes 5 were
formed in good yields (Scheme 4). The corresponding
plausible mechanism for this unusual transformation is the
one-electron oxidation of 1 followed by deprotonation,
oxygen trapping, and subsequent addition of neutral 1 to give
the radical cation of 2, which is eventually reduced. Albeit
an interesting transformation, other allylic alcohols did not
show this behavior and the activity against the P. falciparum
parasite is marginal (Table 2). Thus, we proposed to develop
a qualitative structure-activity relationship by variation of
the trioxane structure 2. From extensive model studies
Scheme 4
10
performed by Jefford et al., it became clear that homolytic
cleavage of the acetal carbon-carbon bond, induced by
single-electron reduction of the peroxy linkage, might be
responsible for the biological activity of 1,2,4-trioxanes.
Obviously, this path is not available for 2 because it would
result in the formation of a vinylic radical. As an alternative
to more promising compounds, the singlet oxygen photo-
oxygenation of allylic alcohol 3 was investigated. The
diastereoselectivity of this ene reaction is remarkably high
in unpolar solvents and drops when protic solvents are used
products derived from the minor (erythro) diastereoisomeric
hydroperoxyalcohol 4 could no longer be detected in the
purified trioxanes from the hydroperoxide mixture obtained
from photooxygenation in CCl . To unambiguously prove
4
the relative configuration of these products, a 73:27 mixture
of diastereoisomers 4 (from the photooxygenation in MeOH)
was treated with acetone/BF and a trans/cis mixture of 5a
3
(
Scheme 3).11
isolated (Scheme 5). The J coupling constants clearly
3
HH
This threo-selectivity is rationalized in terms of the
“
hydroxy-directing effect” which is strongly influenced by
12
competing hydrogen-bond acceptors. To evaluate an en-
Scheme 5
(6) Jefford, C. W.; Jaggi, D.; Boukouvalas, J.; Kohmoto, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 6497-6498. Jefford, C. W.; McGoran, E. C.; Boukouvalas,
J.; Richardson, G.; Robinson, B. L.; Peters, W. HelV. Chim. Acta 1988, 71,
1
805-1812.
(
7) Singh, C. Tetrahdron Lett. 1990, 31, 6901-6902. O’Neill, P. M.;
Pugh, M.; Davies, J.; Ward, S. A.; Park, B. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
4
569-4571.
8) Further approaches: Dussault, P. H.; Davies, D. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
(
1
996, 37, 463-466. Bloodworth, A. J.; Hagen, T.; Johnson, K. A.; LeNoir,
I.; Moussy, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 635-638. O’Neill, P. M.; Pugh,
M.; Davies, J.; Ward, S. A.; Park, B. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4569-
4
5
8
indicated that the major diastereoisomer (3JHH ) 9.5 Hz) has
the trans configuration (from threo-4), and the minor
571.
(9) Griesbeck, A. G.; Sadlek, O.; Polborn, K. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 545-
49.
(
10) Posner, G. H.; Oh, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8328-
329. Jefford, C. W.; Jaggi, D.; Kohmoto, S.; Timari, G.; Bernardinelli,
(12) Adam, W.; Prein, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 477-
G.; Canfield, C. J.; Milhous, W. K. Heterocycles 1998, 49, 375-383.
494.
Jefford, C. W. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1803-1826.
(13) Griesbeck, A. G.; Bartoschek, A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1594-
1595.
(11) Adam, W.; Nestler, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6549-6550.
4194
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 24, 2002