Paper
Catalysis Science & Technology
9
9
9.999%, trace metals basis), chromiumIJII) chloride (CrCl2,
5%, water soluble), chromiumIJIII) chloride hexahydrate
μm, P/N CP8944) connected to a Varian quadrupole-mass
spectrometer (MS) and flame ionization detector (FID) was
used to analyze all organic phase samples. After product
identification by mass spectrometer, product concentrations
were determined from integrated FID peak areas using a
6-point calibration curve generated from purchased
standards: furfural, 5-HMF, levulinic acid, and formic acid.
Reagent and product yields are reported as molar percent-
ages relative to initial molar concentrations of carbohydrate
(i.e. furfural yields = moles furfural/initial moles xylose). All
reported yields were typically reproducible to within a ±5%
relative error (based upon the calculation of one standard
deviation).
(CrCl
3
× 6H
2 2
O, 98%), ironIJII) chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl ×
4
H O, 99.0%), ironIJIII) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl × 6H O,
2
3
2
ACS
trifluoromethanesulfonate IJInIJOTf)
LiCl, BioXtra, ≥99.0% (titration)), scandiumIJIII) triflate IJSc-
IJOTf) , 99%), tinIJII) chloride dihydrate (SnCl × 2H O,
reagent,
98.0–102%,
crystalline),
indiumIJIII)
3
, 99%), lithium chloride
(
3
2
2
9
9.995%, trace metals basis), tinIJIV) chloride pentahydrate
(SnCl4 × 5H O, 98%), tinIJII) trifluoromethanesulfonate IJSn-
2
IJOTf) , 98%), and ytterbiumIJIII) trifluoromethanesulfonate
IJYbIJOTf) , 99.99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
3
2
Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37% v/v, Fisher Scientific) was used
as the Brønsted acid catalyst. n-Butanol (ACS reagent, ≥99%,
Fluka) was used as the organic extracting agent in biphasic
experiments. All materials were used as purchased, without
further purification or modification.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Energy Biosciences Institute
funded by BP. Special thanks for his assistance in conducting
the reported research is given to Daniel Tjandra.
4
.2 Experimental approach
All experiments were performed in 10 ml glass vials (from
Sigma-Aldrich via supplier Supelco) sealed with 20 mm
aluminum-crimped PTFE septa and heated using a silicon oil
bath to maintain constant reaction temperature and stirring
rate. In a representative glucose dehydration experiment, glu-
cose was dissolved in nanopure water, to which SnCl4 and
References
1
(a) M. J. Climent, A. Corma and S. Iborra, Green Chem.,
011, 13, 520–540; (b) G. A. Tompsett, N. Li and G. W.
2
Huber, Catalytic Conversions of Sugars to Fuels, in
Thermochemical Processing of Biomass: Conversion into Fuels,
Chemicals and Power, ed. R. C. Brown, John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester, 2011, pp. 223–279; (c) J. N. Chheda, G. W. Huber
and J. A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46(38),
HCl were added to create a solution (750 mM glucose, 25
+
mM SnCl
4
, 50 mM H ). A 4 ml aliquot of this solution was
sealed into a 10 ml glass vial. The vial was then placed in a
silicone oil bath heated to 140 °C and stirred at 600 rpm.
Upon completion of the reaction, the sample was removed
and quenched in an ice bath. An internal standard (1 ml of
7
164–7183; (d) T. Werpy, G. Petersen, A. Aden, J. Bozell, J.
Holladay, J. White and A. Manheim, Report No. NREL/TP-
10–35523. Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass: Vol. 1
Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars
5
—
−
1
7
5 mg ml 1,6-hexanediol in water) was added and the sam-
ple centrifuged to remove all water insoluble particulates. A
portion of the reaction mixture (500 μl) was diluted in a 1 : 1
ratio with nanopure water and taken for HPLC analysis. For
reactions involving an additional organic phase, the aqueous
phase volume was reduced to 1 ml and butanol (4 ml) was
added prior to sealing the reaction vial. At reaction end, the
organic phase was separated via centrifuging. The aqueous
phase was treated as above and analyzed via HPLC while a
and Synthesis Gas, National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, CO, 2004, pp. 1–77; (e) K. J. Zeitsch, Sugar Ser.,
2
000, 13, 1–353.
(a) V. Choudhary, S. Sandler and D. Vlachos, ACS Catal.,
012, 2(9), 2022–2028; (b) V. Choudhary, S. Caratzoulas and
2
3
2
D. Vlachos, Carbohydr. Res., 2013, 368, 89–95.
V. Choudhary, S. H. Mushrif, C. Ho, A. Anderko, V.
Nikolakis, N. S. Marinkovic, A. I. Frenkel, S. I. Sandler and
D. G. Vlachos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 3997–4006.
J. B. Binder, J. J. Blank, A. V. Cefali and R. T. Raines,
ChemSusChem, 2010, 3(11), 1268–1272.
(a) R. Weingarten, A. Rodriguez-Beuerman, F. Cao, J. S.
Luterbacher, D. M. Alonso, J. A. Dumesic and G. W. Huber,
ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(8), 2229–2234; (b) E. I. Gürbüz,
J. M. R. Gallo, D. M. Alonso, S. G. Wettstein, W. Y. Lim and
J. A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 52(4),
1270–1274.
−
1
different internal standard (1 ml of 5 mg ml guaiacol in tol-
uene) was added to the organic phase prior to GC/MS
analysis.
4
5
4
.3 Product analysis
A Shimadzu HPLC equipped with a Phenomenex Rezex RFQ-
+
2 4
Fast Acid H column (100 × 7.8 mm; 0.01 N H SO ; 1.0 ml
−
1
min ; 55 °C) and a refractive index detector (RID) was used
to analyze all aqueous samples. Product quantities were
determined by converting integrated HPLC peak areas into
concentrations using a 7-point calibration curve generated
from purchased standards: xylose, glucose, xylulose, fructose,
lyxose, mannose, furfural, 5-HMF, levulinic acid, and formic acid.
A Varian CP-3800 Gas Chromatograph equipped with a
FactorFour Capillary Column (UF-5 ms 30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25
6 E. Nikolla, Y. Roman-Leshkov, M. Moliner and M. E. Davis,
ACS Catal., 2011, 1(4), 408–410.
7 (a) R. van Putten, J. C. van der Waal, E. de Jong, C. B.
Rasrendra, H. J. Heeres and J. G. de Vries, Chem. Rev.,
2013, 113, 1499–1597; (b) P. Gallezot, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2012, 41, 1538–1558.
Catal. Sci. Technol.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015