190
R.V. Pai et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508 (2010) 184–190
the donor cations take a major part in the conduction process
and the conductivity increases. At 10 mol% and 15 mol% dopant
concentration, PCeZT showed maximum conductivity among the
same class of samples. It was also observed that in PCeZT samples
the conductivity increases with increase in dopant concentration
whereas for both the Pr and Nd containing samples the conductiv-
due to the fact that at higher Ce ion concentration, more cationic
vacancies are created at A site which contributes more towards the
conductivity values. The variation of DC conductivity for PZT and
Pb0.85R0.15Zr0.65Ti0.35O3 where R = Ce, Pr and Nd with 1/T is given
in Fig. 11. The conductivity in Nd doped samples showed a mini-
mum value among all the samples and decreased with dopant ion
concentration. The amount of pyrochlore phase in the Nd contain-
ing samples increased with increase in Nd concentration leading to
reduction in the conductivity of these samples.
agement. We also express our gratitude to Shri Sunil Kumar PIED
for his support in carrying out the SEM analysis.
References
[1] J.N. Kim, M.J. Haun, S. Jm, L.E. Cross, X.R. Xue., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr.
Freq. Control 36 (1989) 4–20.
[2] M.E. Lines, A.M. Glass, Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related
Materials, Oxford, 1979.
[3] S.B. Majumdar, D.C. Agarwal, Y.N. Mohapatra, V.N. Kulkarni, Ferroelectrics 9
(1995) 271–284.
[4] G.A.C.M. Spierings, M.J.E. Ulenaers, G.L.M. Kampschöer, H.A.M. van Hal, P.K.
Larsen, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 2290–2298.
[5] B. Jaffe, W.R. Cook, H. Jaffe, Piezoelectric Ceramics, Academic Press, San Diego,
CA, 1971, Chapters 5 and 7.
[6] W.L. Warren, D. Dimos, G.E. Pike, B.A. Tuttle, M.V. Raymond, R. Ramesh, J.T.
Evans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 (1995) 866–872.
[7] D. Dimos, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 25 (1995) 273–275.
[8] P. Gonnard, M. Troccas, J. Solid State Chem. 23 (1978) 321–326.
[9] M. Troccazs, P. Gonnard, L. Eyraud, Ferroelectrics 22 (1978) 871–874.
[10] H.B. Park, C.Y. Park, Y.S. Hong, K. Kim, S.J. Kim, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999)
94–102.
4. Conclusions
[11] V.M. Goldschmidt, Skr. Nor. Vidensk.-Akad., 1: Mat. Naturvidensk. Kl. 2 (1926)
8–17.
Homogeneous, single-phase PZT containing 5, 10 and 15 mol%
of Ce and Pr were prepared by a novel solution based technique.
But Nd containing samples showed the presence of pyrochlore
phases in the calcined powders. The redox behaviour studies con-
cluded that these compounds are stable up to 650 ◦C. Also these
studies showed that dopant incorporation reduces the tempera-
ture required for degradation. Ce dopant found responsible for the
restoration of initial phases of these compounds when subjected to
multiple TPO–TPR cycles. The dielectric constants of PZT decreased
with Ce doping because of the B site occupancy whereas the polariz-
ability of samples increases with Pr doping. The DC conductivity of
the samples increases with increase in Ce concentration, which may
be due to the creation of cationic vacancy at A site. The pyrochlore
phase in Nd doped samples was found to be responsible for lower
conductivity as well as lower dielectric constant values.
[12] S.G. Majumder, Y.N. Mohapatra, D.C. Agrawal, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997)
2141–2150.
[13] M.J. Akhtar, Z. Akhtar, R.A. Jackson, C.R.A. Catlow, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995)
421–428.
[14] H.D. Sharma, A. Govindan, T.C. Goel, P.K.C. Pillai, C. Pramila, J. Mater. Sci. Lett.
15 (1996) 1424–1426.
[15] P.A. Langjahr, F.F. Lange, T. Wagner, M. Ruhle, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 773–785.
[16] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A 32 (1976) 751–767.
[17] Y. Tsur, A. Hitomi, A.I. Scrymgeour, C.A. Randall, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part I 40
(2001) 255–258.
[18] S.S. Chnadratreya, R.M. Fulrath, J.A. Pask, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64 (1981) 422–425.
[19] B.V. Hiremath, A.I. Kingon, J.V. Biggers, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66 (1983) 790–793.
[20] R.V. Kamat, K.T. Pillai, V.N. Vaidya, D.D. Sood, Mater. Chem. Phys. 46 (1996)
67–71.
[21] V. Rajesh, T.V. Pai, Vittal Rao, S.K. Ashok Kumar, V. Mukerjee, Venugopal, J.
Alloys Compd 443 (2007) 166–170.
[22] K.G. Brooks, I.M. Reaney, R. Klissurska, Y. Haung, L. Bursill, N. Setter, J. Mater.
Res. 9 (1994) 2540–2553.
[23] Q.-Y. Shao, A.-D. Li, Y.-F. Tang, H.-Q. Ling, N.-B. Ming, Mater. Chem. Phys. 75
(2002) 207–210.
[24] S.B. Majumder, D.C. Agrawal, Y.N. Mohapatra, R.S. Katiyar, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 98
(2003) 25–32.
Acknowledgements
[25] S.H. Lee, S.J. Lee, S.H. Kim, B.G. Chae, Y.S. Yang, H.J. Joo, J.P. Kim, W.S. Park, M.S.
Jang, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 32 (1998) 1670–1675.
[26] D.F. Ryder, N.K. Raman, J. Electron. Mater. 21 (1992) 971–975.
The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to Dr. S.K.
Aggarwal, Head, Fuel Chemistry Division, for his constant encour-