X. Liu et al.
Journal of Solid State Chemistry 300 (2021) 122239
Scheme 1. The preparation process diagram of WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2.
a new strategy for green preparation of AA by H2O2 oxidation of CHE
without any other reagents.
programmed to rise to 600 ꢁC at a rate of 10 ꢁC⋅minꢀ1. The electrical
signal was detected by the TCD thermal conductivity detector. In order to
test the thermal stability of the tungsten multiphase catalyst, TGA-DTG
measurements were performed on a METTLER TGA/DSC1. The temper-
ature was increased from 30 to 800 ꢁC with heating rate of 10 ꢁC⋅minꢀ1
under nitrogen atmosphere. FT-IR spectra were carried out on HGCS
spectrometer from 500 to 4000 cmꢀ1 using material diluted with KBr.
SEM pictures were obtained by JEM-2100 electron microscope.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalysts preparation
2.1.1. Preparation of SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 support
The SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 was manufactured by the impregnation precip-
itation method [20]. Firstly, 1.2 mol TiCl4 and 1.2 mol ZrOCl2⋅8H2O
were diluted by 200 ml deionized water. PH of the mixture was
controlled at around 9–10 with NH3∙H2O and then stirred for 1 h. Then
the solution was placed at room temperature for 10 h, and the filter cake
was repeatedly washed until all Clꢀ were washed away (detected with
0.1 mol Lꢀ1 AgNO3). Subsequently, the dried precipitate solid was
immersed in 0.5 mol Lꢀ1 H2SO4 aqueous solution (proportion of 15 ml
2.4. Catalysts test
110 mmol H2O2 (50%) and 0.28 g catalyst were placed in a three-
mouth flask with an isobaric drop funnel and reflux unit of the ther-
mometer. When reaction temperature reached 75 ꢁC, 25 mmol CHE was
added until no reflux occurred in the reaction system, and the reaction
temperature was finally raised to 95 ꢁC for 6 h. The quantitative and
qualitative analysis of products was respectively carried out using gas
chromatography (GC, SE-30 Capillary column) and gas chromatograph-
mass spectrometer (GC-MS) under hot conditions (FID detector temper-
ature: 280 ꢁC; Injection temperature: 280 ꢁC; Heating procedure: 40–280
ꢁC with a heating rate of 10 ꢁC and stayed at 120 ꢁC for 5min).
g
ꢀ1) for 12 h. Finally, the dried filter cake was calcined in a muffle
furnace at 550 ꢁC for 4 h and the resulting product was named
SO24--ZrO2–TiO2. A similar method for preparing CuO–TiO2, La2O3–TiO2,
ZrO2–TiO2 by replacing ZrOCl2⋅8H2O with Cu(NO3)2⋅H2O and
La2(NO3)3⋅6H2O.
2.1.2. Synthesis of WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 sample
3. Results and discussion
The synthesis of the WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 sample was prepared via
the complexation method. First of all, 3.75 g (NH4)10W12O41~xH2O was
dissolved in an aqueous solution containing 0.5 g C2H2O4⋅2H2O and was
stirred for 4 h at 25 ꢁC. Subsequently, 8.01 g SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 was added
to above solution. And then the resulting mixed solution (A) was heated
to 85 ꢁC. They were maintaining reaction temperature until all water
evaporated. In the end, the dried solid was calcined and treated in muffle
furnace at 450 ꢁC for 4 h. The product obtained was named X WO3/SO24--
ZrO2–TiO2 (X was the mass fraction of WO3 in the catalyst). WO3/
CuO–TiO2, WO3/La2O3–TiO2 and WO3/ZrO2–TiO2 were also prepared in
the same way, except to replace SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 with CuO–TiO2,
La2O3–TiO2 and ZrO2–TiO2, respectively.
3.1. Characterization of the catalyst
SEM images of ZrO2–TiO2, SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 and WO3/SO42--ZrO2–TiO2
catalysts were presented in Fig. 1. The ZrO2–TiO2 exhibited irregular
lumps structures in Fig. 1a–c. However, when SO24ꢀ was introduced, the
sulfated ZrO2–TiO2 (SO24--ZrO2–TiO2) showed
a smooth surface.
Furthermore, the ZrO2–TiO2 sample size also became relatively uniform
due to the existence of SO24ꢀ (Fig. 1d–f). After loading with WO3, the
WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 catalyst exhibited a rough surface (Fig. 1g–i),
which demonstrated that the WO3 had been successfully decorated on
SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 surface.
The crystal structure of pure WO3 and a series of composite samples
were characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) in Fig. 2b. It could
be clearly seen that the SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 presented similar curves [21,22],
compared to the pristine ZrO2–TiO2. Furthermore, the characteristic
peak appeared at ca. 54ꢁ completely disappeared, and the other peak at
31ꢁ showed a significant shift (31 to 22ꢁ) [23,24]. This phenomenon
illustrated that the synergistic effect between ZrO2–TiO2 and SO24ꢀ could
lightly eliminate the crystal structure of the ZrO2–TiO2 sample and
reduce the influence caused by various crystal types. Interestingly, the
diffraction peaks located at 23, 33 and ca.50ꢁ were identified over the
complexation WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 in Fig. 2a. With the increase of WO3,
the flat peaks were gradually strengthened to be sharp peaks, and peak
position was almost unchanged. It indicated the WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2
was successfully synthesized.
2.2. Preparation of WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2–H sample
Solution A was aged 24 h at room temperature, then it was main-
tained at 110 ꢁC for 24 h in hydrothermal synthesis reactor. After filtering
and drying, the precipitate was calcined in muffle furnace at 450 ꢁC for 4
h, named WO3/SO24--ZrO2–TiO2–H.
2.3. Characterization of catalyst
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a RINT2000
vertical goniometer X-ray diffractometer (using CuK
α radiation (λ ¼
0.15418 nm) in the range of 10–80ꢁ, at a speed of 5ꢁ⋅minꢀ1). N2
adsorption-desorption isotherm was carried out on ASAP 2020V4.01
sorptometer at ꢀ196 ꢁC. All samples were outgassed at 100 ꢁC for 8 h
before the measurement. NH3-TPD was used to reflect NH3 adsorption on
the catalyst surface. It was fully automated by Zhejiang Pantai Instrument
FINESORB-3010 Temperature-rising chemisorption to test. The test
sample was 70 mg, the particle size was 40–60 mesh, and the TPD process
was pretreated at 200 ꢁC for 1h. At room temperature of 25 ꢁC, NH3 was
adsorbed for 1 h and N2 was purged for 15 min. The temperature was
FT-IR spectra was employed to further study on the chemical con-
struction of ZrO2–TiO2 and SO24--ZrO2–TiO2 in Fig. 3a. The absorption
bands at around 3444 and 1630 cmꢀ1 were attributed to the character-
istic peaks of water (O–H). Similarly, compared to the pristine
ZrO2–TiO2, for SO42--ZrO2–TiO2 and WO3/SO42--ZrO2–TiO2, the absorp-
tion peaks between 1055 and 1125 cmꢀ1 were belonged to the charac-
–
teristic peaks of S O and S–O, which was well indexed to the double
–
2