L. Wesemann, B. Drießen-Hölscher et al.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
(1133.7): calcd. C 48.73, H 6.40, N 1.24; found C 49.51, H 6.01,
N 1.59.
[9] [9a]
Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Com-
pounds (Ed.: B. Cornils, W. A. Herrmann), Wiley-VCH,
P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, P. C. J. Kamer,
J. N. H. Reek, P. Dierkes, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2741Ϫ2769.
[9b]
Weinheim, 2000.
[Bu3MeN]2[(dppp)Pt(SnB11H11)2] (2): At room temperature a solu-
tion of [(dppp)PtCl2] (250 mg, 0.37 mmol) in 20 mL of CH2Cl2 was
added to a solution of [Bu3MeN]2[SnB11H11] (479 mg, 0.74 mmol)
also in 20 mL of CH2Cl2. The colour of the reaction mixture turned
orange immediately and after 14 h stirring the solvent was evapor-
ated. The resulting solid was washed with water (two times with
30 mL). Crystallization from acetone/methanol at room temper-
ature yielded yellow-green crystals of 2 (498 mg, 90%). 1H NMR
(CD2Cl2, 200 MHz, TMS, without the signals for [Bu3MeN]ϩ): δ ϭ
2.08 (m, 2 H, dppp), 2.42 (m, 4 H, dppp), 7.48 (m, 12 H, Ph), 7.85
(m, 8 H, Ph) ppm. 11B{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 64 MHz, ext.
BF3Et2O): δ ϭ Ϫ15.8 (s, B2ϪB11), Ϫ9.5 (s, B12) ppm. 31P{1H}
NMR (CD2Cl2, 81 MHz, ext. H3PO4): δ ϭ Ϫ1.1 (s, 1JPt-P ϭ 2820.7,
2JP-Sn ϭ 2127.5 Hz)] ppm. C53H108B22N2P2PtSn (1387.0): calcd. C
42.28, H 7.23, N 1.86; found C 42.11, H 7.32, N 2.12.
[10] [10a]
L. A. van der Veen, P. K. Keeven, P. C. J. Kamer, P. W.
N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 13,
[10b]
2105Ϫ2112.
J.-T. Chen, Y.-S. Yeh, C.-S. Yang, F.-Y. Tsai,
G.-L. Huang, B.-C. Shu, T.-M. Huang, Y.-S. Chen, G.-H. Lee,
M.-C. Cheng, C.-C. Wang, Y. Wang, Organometallics 1994, 13,
4804Ϫ4824. [10c] I. Toth, T. Kegl, C. J. Elsevier, L. Kollar, Inorg.
Chem. 1994, 33, 5708Ϫ5712.
´
´
´
[11] [11a] P. Haelg, G. Consiglio, P. Pino, Helv. Chim. Acta 1981, 64,
[11b]
1865Ϫ1869.
J. K. Stille, H. Su, P. Brechot, G. Parrinello,
[11c]
L. S. Hegedus, Organometallics 1991, 10, 1183Ϫ1189.
I.
´
Toth, I. Guo, B. E. Hanson, Organometallics 1993, 12,
[11d]
848Ϫ852.
A. Scrivanti, V. Beghetto, A. Bastianini, U.
Matteoli, G. Menchi, Organometallics 1996, 15, 4687Ϫ4694.
[11e]
J. Bakos, S. Cserepi-Szucs, A. Gomory, C. Hegedus, L.
Marko, A. Szollosy, Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 725Ϫ730.
C. Y. Hsu, M. Orchin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3553Ϫ
[12]
[13]
Experimental Setup: All hydroformylations were carried out in a
75 mL steel autoclave which was built in the workshop of the Insti-
tut für Makromolekulare und Technische Chemie der Technischen
Hochschule Aachen. The autoclave possesses a 25 mL dropping
funnel equipped with a pressure release, a valve connected to a steel
capillary with a diameter of 1 mm to take samples, a manometer
and two other valves. The reaction mixture was stirred by a cross
magnetic stirrer.
3554.
I. Schwager, J. F. Knifton, J. Catal. 1976, 45, 256Ϫ263.
[14] [14a]
M. S. Holt, W. L. Wilson, J. H. Nelson, Chem. Rev. 1989,
[14b]
89, 11Ϫ49.
J. D. Donaldson, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 8,
287Ϫ356. [14c] F. Glocking, in Chemistry of Tin (Ed.: P. G. Har-
rison), Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989, pp. 245Ϫ293.
[15] [15a]
G. K. Anderson, H. C. C. Clark, J. A. Davies, Organomet-
[15b]
allics 1982, 1, 64Ϫ70.
G. K. Anderson, H. C. Clark, J. A.
[15c]
Davies, Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 427Ϫ433.
G. K. Anderson,
Experimental Procedure for Hydroformylations: The reactor was
evacuated and filled with argon three times. The catalyst solution,
prepared previously in a Schlenk vessel, was then introduced (the
exact amount was determined by a syringe). The exact amounts of
1-octene and of GC standard (di-n-butyl ether) were transferred to
the dropping funnel. The autoclave was pressurized with synthesis
gas (CO/H2) and was heated to reaction temperature by placing it
in an oil bath. The reaction mixture was stirred at 750 rpm and
kept for 30 minutes at the reaction temperature in order to ensure
the preformation of the active catalyst species before the mixture
of 1-octene and GC standard was added. Finally the autoclave was
cooled in an ice bath, slowly vented and the mixture was analysed
by GC.
H. C. Clark, J. A. Davies, Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 434Ϫ438.
[15d]G. K. Anderson, C. Billard, H. C. Clark, J. A. Davies, C. S.
Wong, Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 439Ϫ443.
[16] [16a]
C. Botteghi, S. Paganelli, U. Matteoli, A. Scrivanti, R.
Ciorciaro, L. M. Venanzi, Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 284Ϫ287.
[16b]
C. Botteghi, S. Paganelli, J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 417,
C41ϪC45. [16c] C. Botteghi, S. Paganelli, A. Perosa, R. Lazzaa-
roni, G. Uccello-Barretta, J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 447,
153Ϫ157.
[17] [17a]
P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, C. F. Roobeek, R. L. Wife, J.
H. G. Frijns, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 31Ϫ33. [17b]
P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, C. F. Roobeek, R. L. Wife, J. H. G.
Frijns, A. G. Orpen, Organometallics 1990, 9, 1211Ϫ1222.
[18]
G. Butler, C. Eaborn, A. Pidcock, J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,
Analytical Methods for Hydroformylations: The GC chromato-
grams were recorded on a Sichromat 2 apparatus (Siemens)
equipped with a FID detector and an HP-LAS 3359 integrator.
Column: 50m Pona-HP-FS; temperature program: 5 min isotherm
at 80 °C; 8 °C per minute to 25 °C; temperature of the evaporator:
250 °C; He, 1.5bar; volume of the sample: 0.2 to 1.0 µL.
181, 47Ϫ53.
[19]
X-ray crystal structure analysis of 2: C53H108B22N2P2PtSn2;
Mr ϭ 1505.64; orthorhombic space group Pbcn (no. 60); a ϭ
˚
20.2352(6), b ϭ 19.5630(7), c ϭ 17.9094(7) A, V ϭ 7089.6(4)
A , Z ϭ 4, ρcalcd. ϭ 1.411 g cmϪ3; µlin. ϭ 2.748 mmϪ1; Stoe
3
˚
˚
IPDS II diffractometer; Mo-Kα (λ ϭ 0.71073 A); graphite mon-
ochromator, data collection at 170 K in 323 frames with ω-
scans (0 Յ ω Յ 180°, ϕ ϭ 0°; 0 Յ ω Յ 180°, ϕ ϭ 60°; 0 Յ ω
Յ 180°, ϕ ϭ 90°; 0 Յ ω Յ 106°, ϕ ϭ 180°; ∆ω ϭ 2°, exposition
time of 1 min) in the 2θ range of 2.3 to 59.5° on a single crystal
0.7 ϫ 0.4 ϫ 0.5 mm; 233603 reflections measured, 9587 inde-
pendent, 7492 observed with I Ͼ 2σ(I); corrections for Lorentz
and polarisation factors; numerical absorption correction,
max./min. transmission 0.3371/0.1674; structure solution with
direct methods[20] and difference Fourier synthesis, F2
refinement;[21Ϫ23] anisotropic parameters for non-hydrogen
atoms, and hydrogen atoms placed in calculated positions
[1]
R. W. Chapman, J. G. Kester, K. Folting, W. E. Streib, L. J.
Todd, Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 979Ϫ983.
[2]
W. H. Knoth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1274Ϫ1275.
[3]
S. V. Ivanov, J. J. Rockwell, O. G. Polyakov, C. M. Gaudinski,
O. P. Anderson, K. A. Solntsev, S. H. Strauss, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 4224Ϫ4225.
L. Wesemann, T. Marx, U. Englert, M. Ruck, Eur. J. Inorg.
[4]
˚
˚
(CϪH ϭ 0.98 A, BϪH ϭ 1.1 A). Due to partial disorder the
Bu3MeN cations were refined using an isotropic structure
model without hydrogen positions. Convergence obtained for
374 variables with R1(all) ϭ 0.076 wR2(all) ϭ 0.169, GooF ϭ
Chem. 1999, 9, 1563Ϫ1566.
[5]
T. Marx, L. Wesemann, J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 614Ϫ615,
137Ϫ143.
[6]
T. Marx, L. Wesemann, S. Dehnen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001,
627, 1146Ϫ1150.
T. Marx, L. Wesemann, S. Dehnen, I. Pantenburg, Chem. Eur.
Ϫ3
˚
1.176; max./min. residual electron density ϩ2.31/Ϫ1.78 e A
.
[7]
CCDC-177990 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html [or from the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road,
J. 2001, 7, 3025Ϫ3032.
[8]
T. Marx, L. Wesemann, I. Pantenburg, Organometallics 2001,
20, 5241Ϫ5244.
2264
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 2261Ϫ2265