studies are required to determine the role of confinement of the
catalytic species in these materials. Such studies are currently
being carried out in our laboratories.
Financial support to MOC and JW by the Delft Research
Centre for Sustainable Industrial Processes, and to FM by the
Dutch National Science Foundation NWO (NWO/STW) is
gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
1
2
(a) D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Science, 2003, 299, 1702; (b) Catalyst
Separation Recovery and Recycling: Chemistry and Process Design,
ed. D. J. Cole-Hamilton and R. P. Tooze, Springer, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 2006; (c) A. F. Trinidade, P. M. P. Gois and
C. A. M. Afonso, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 418.
(a) For a thematic issue on catalyst immobilization see: Chem.
Rev., 2002, 102, 3215–3892; (b) J. N. H. Reek, P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen, A. G. J. van der Ham and A. B. de Haan, Catalyst
Separation, Recovery and Recycling: Chemistry and Process Design,
ed. D. J. Cole-Hamilton and R. P. Tooze, Springer, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 2006, ch. 3.
Fig. 2 High-pressure FT-IR spectra of Rh–Nixantphos in Me-THF
at 20 bars of CO/H = 1/1 pressure and 80 1C.
2
catalyst under these conditions. We also studied the reproduci-
bility of the catalyst immobilization by making a new batch of
supported ligand, using the same batch of silica SBA-15 and
identical conditions. The SBA-15 metal complex 2 showed
slightly decreased performance when this second batch was
applied as hydroformylation reaction (entries 7–9, Table 1).
While selectivities remained comparable to the previous batch
of SBA-15 material (linear over branched ratios around 30 and
3 (a) A. J. Sandee, L. A. van der Veen, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer,
M. Lutz, A. L. Spek and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 3231; (b) A. J. Sandee, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J.
Kamer and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001,
123, 8468.
4
0, respectively, at 50 and 20 bars of syn-gas pressure),
activities almost halved, with TOFs going down to 101 and
92 for the process at 50 and 20 bars respectively. Decreased
4
C. T. Kresge, M. E. Leonowicz, W. J. Roth, J. C. Vartuli and
J. S. Beek, Nature, 1992, 359, 710.
(a) J. S. Beek, J. C. Vartuli, W. J. Roth, M. E. Leonowicz,
C. T. Kresge, K. D. Schmitt, C. T.-W. Chu, D. H. Olson,
E. W. Sheppard, S. B. McCullen, J. B. Higgins and
J. L. Schlenker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 10834;
1
5
catalytic performance is also observed in terms of catalyst
stability. While the first batch of supported metal complex 2
was recycled up to 15 times, leading to a cumulative TON of
(
2
b) M.-O. Coppens, J. Sun and T. Maschmeyer, Catal. Today,
001, 69, 331; (c) Catalysts for Fine Chemical Synthesis: Micro-
6
7 716, the second batch of supported catalyst already showed
deterioration after the 4th cycle (cumulative TON of 4083),
leading to increased 1-octene isomerization and decreased
regioselectivity. Differences in stability and performance
between the different batches might be due to the used immobili-
porous and Mesoporous Solid Catalysts, ed. E. G. Derouane, Wiley
Ltd., Chichester, England, 2006; (d) J. A. Bae, K.-C. Song,
J.-K. Jeon, Y. S. Ko, Y.-K. Park and J.-H. Yim, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater., 2009, 123, 289.
P. Selvam, S. K. Bhatia and C. G. Sonwane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2001, 40, 3237.
(a) B. Pugin, H. Landert, F. Spindler and H. U. Blaser, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2002, 344, 974; (b) R. Dorta, D. Broggini, R. Stoop,
H. Ruegger, F. Spindler and A. Togni, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10,
267.
(a) X. Feng, G. E. Fryxell, L.-Q. Wang, A. Y. Kim, J. Liu and
K. M. Kemmer, Science, 1997, 276, 923; (b) J. Liu, X. Feng,
G. E. Frixell, L.-Q. Wang, A. Y. Kim and M. Gong, Adv. Mater.,
6
7
15
zation technique. It was shown that when rhodium complex 1
was supported by standard techniques, pre-condensation of
ligand 1 could form clusters of 1, grafted to the silica support.
This high local density of catalyst species on the pore surface,
which may vary between batches, could lead to local depletion
8
12,14
of substrates, resulting in lower performance.
In conclusion, we successfully applied complex 2, covalently
anchored to SBA-15, to the rhodium-catalyzed hydroformyla-
tion of 1-octene. High activities and selectivities were obtained
compared to its supported silica gel analogue, demonstrating
the effect of the application of structured supports. Up to 94%
of linear aldehyde was obtained, free of metal complex, by
simple filtration. Moreover, activities exceeding those of
homogeneous analogues were obtained in some experiments.
This could be explained by the formation of inactive dimers
under homogeneous conditions, as indicated by HP-IR experi-
ments, which may be suppressed by site isolation effects when
these catalysts are supported on SBA-15. While such dimer
formation could also be suppressed by immobilization on
commercially available silica, this effect is then counter-
balanced by the generally negative effects of immobilization.
The presented results using SBA-15 demonstrate the impor-
tance of the nature of the support, and also show that the
supported catalyst can have advantages beyond mere catalyst
recycling. The reproducibility of the catalyst immobilization
should be improved before industrial application, and detailed
1
998, 10, 161.
9 J. M. Thomas, R. Raja and D. W. Lewis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
005, 44, 6456.
2
1
0 (a) B. F. G. Johnson, S. A. Raynor, D. S. Shephard,
T. Mashmeyer, J. M. Thomas, G. Sankar, S. Bromley,
R. Oldroyd, L. Gladden and M. D. Mantle, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 1167; (b) C. M. Crudden, D. Allen, M. D. Mikoluk and
J. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1154; (c) C. Li, Catal. Rev., 2004,
4
1
6, 419; (d) T. J. Terry and T. D. P. Stack, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
30, 4945.
11 (a) D. Zhao, Q. Huo, J. Feng, B. F. Chmelka and G. D. Stucky,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6024; (b) D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo,
N. Melosh, G. H. Fredrickson, B. F. Chmelka and G. D. Stucky,
Science, 1998, 279, 548.
2 P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, C. P. Casey and G. T. Whiteker,
Rhodium Catalyzed Hydroformylation, ed. P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen and C. Claver, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 2001.
3 (a) A.-H. Lu, W.-C. Li, W. Schmidt, W. Kiefer and F. Schuth,
¨
Carbon, 2004, 42, 2939; (b) R. Pitchumani, W. Li and
M.-O. Coppens, Catal. Today, 2005, 105, 618.
4 P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 212, 61.
5 F. Marras, A. M. Kluwer, J. R. Siekierzycka, A. Vozza,
A. M. Brouwer and J. N. H. Reek, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2010, 49, 5480.
1
1
1
1
This journal is ꢀc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6587–6589 | 6589