1
258
S. Fukugaichi et al.
acetaldehyde was greater inTO than in ATO. Figure 4
shows changes in the concentration of CO after the UV
2
irradiation, and this indicated that the generation of CO2
with the decomposition of acetaldehyde was higher inTO
than in ATO. The kacet and kco2 values in Table 1 also
showed that photocatalytic activity in the decomposition of
acetaldehyde was higher in TO than in ATO. These
observations indicated that the photocatalytic activity of
TiO2 reduced by the boiling treatment with sodium
hydroxide.
The composite material (T/Z) showed the highest
adsorption and decomposition abilities of acetaldehyde
within the samples (Figs. 3, 4). After the UV irradiation,
Fig. 3 Changes in acetaldehyde concentration with time. UV was
irradiated at 18 min from the beginning of experiment
calculated reaction rate constant for CO generation, kco2 ,
2
-
was 0.46 s (Table 1), and this value was higher than that
1
-
1
of TO and ATO (0.26 and 0.22 s ). Because we prelim-
inarily confirmed that the synthesized X-type zeolite had
no photocatalytic activity, the only material which can
decompose acetaldehyde into CO and H O is TiO . In this
2
2
2
study, each 100 mg of the sample was used. Although the
amout of TiO in T/Z sample was 22.6 mg, the kco value
2
2
of T/Z was higher than that of 100 mg of TO and ATO.
This indicated the generation of a synergy effect between
TiO and zeolite, in the decomposition of acetaldehyde.
2
2
Fig. 4 Changes in CO concentration with UV irradiation time
The physical mixture (T ? Z) showed a little bit lower
adsorptivity than T/Z (Fig. 3). The adsorption of acetal-
dehyde in the dark is mainly due to X-type zeolite con-
In the XRD pattern of the physical mixture of ATO and
ZE (T ? Z), peaks of both TiO and X-type zeolite were
2
tained in them. On the other hand, kco value of T ? Z was
2
-
0.13 s , and this was quite lower than that of T/Z
1
identified, and shift of the peak positions was not observed.
-
(0.46 s ), and also lower than those of TO and ATO.
1
SEM observation reveled that TiO and zeolite particles
2
were separately existed (Fig. 2d). The attachment of small
Because material composition of T ? Z and T/Z is similar
TiO particles onto the large zeolite particles, which was
2
(TiO
suggested that, in the case of T ? Z, little synergy effect
was generated between TiO and zeolite.
Above results indicated that the formation of composite
material of TiO and zeolite through synthesis of zeolite in
the presence of TiO increased photocatalytic activity of
the TiO . Because boiling treatment with sodium hydrox-
ide did not increase the photocatalytic activity of TiO ,
2
2
= 22.6 %, X-type zeolite = 77.4 %), above result
observed in T/Z, was hardly observed. The BET surface
2
-1
area of T ? Z was 514 m g , a little bit smaller than the
2
2
weighted average (539 m g ), and greater than that of
-1
2 -1
T/Z (478 m g ). The greater BET surface area of T ? Z
2
than that of T/Z can be explained by fewer attachment of
2
TiO onto zeolite in T ? Z. From these results, we con-
2
2
cluded that composite of TiO and X-type zeolite (T/Z)
2
was successfully synthesized, by the coexistence of TiO2
during the synthesis of X-type zeolite.
increase in the activity is ascribed to the synergy effect
mentioned above. The synergy effect occurred in T/Z is
assumed to be adsorption and condensation of acetalde-
hyde gas onto the surface of zeolite, and subsequent
3
.2 Photocatalytic Activity Measurement
transfer of acetaldehyde from zeolite to TiO . Similar
2
The results of adsorption and photocatalytic decomposition
experiments of acetoaldehyde gas are shown in Fig. 3. At
the region before the irradiation of UV light, decrease in
the concentration of acetaldehyde is ascribed to the
adsorption of acetaldehyde onto each samples. When we
compared TO and ATO, the amount of adsorption of
acetaldehyde was greater in ATO. However, after the
irradiation of UV, the decrease in the concentration of
synergy effect is also expected in T ? Z, but the distance
between TiO
transfer of acetaldehyde (Fig. 2d). Therefore, the distance
between zeolite (adsorbent) and TiO (photocatalyst) is the
key point for this kind of synergy effect. Similar synergy
effects were reported in the composites of TiO and
adsorbents [8–20], but this is the first study to show
increase in the photocatalytic activity of TiO in a
and zeolite may be too far to enable the
2
2
2
2
1
23